This is pretty much the most immature video response about Anita Sarkeesian that I've ever seen.
It's not a question of it she played it or not, she still did the fucking research she wanted to do. Why is the internet so bull headed in taking her down rather than participating in whatever discussion she wants to present?
Sometimes things just open themselves up to discussion, wether Spill knew anything about him or not. They're having a conversation about it, It doesn't sound like they're being assholes. They have their world, and it's seperate from giantbomb's you don't do anything a favour saying things like "Fuck those guys"
It's worse to react to it in a negative way, because they really don't mean any harm.
It's amazing, that they come back from E3, get back to what ever work they have to do once they're back, or maybe they want to have a bit of a breather. or it's possible that it's their site and they're doing things the way they can, or want to.
While the site does like the idea of producing content for it's users, it's not going to bend over backwards and suck your dick.
If the voice is more important to you than the character itself that there's a problem. Voice actors are always subject to change. Hayter was a good voice, but he didn't make Snake. The convoluted writing did.
I think Kiefer is a good fit, and has done enough voice acting in his time to know what he's doing.
I think it's a bold statement to say that he ruined it. I mean, you're along for the ride, and sure he did shit for the sake of getting the goat of the reader, but it got that much of a response out of you and the books aren't even finished yet.
So, I guess it's kind of entertaining to hear a story not go the way you want it to? I don't mean that rudely, but twisting your expectations for how the story should go is kind of cool.