WHAT IS EVERYONE IN THIS THREAD TALKING ABOUT?!?!
Bad games don't get released anymore?! News to me, man. There are absolutely games that get released that are broken on a technical level. Or maybe are boring. Or maybe fail to make the statement they are trying to make. Or are too short.
Are reviews becoming less useful now that we have hours of gameplay footage available for any given game? Sure. But I certainly don't have time to watch hours (or even 20 minutes sometimes) of gameplay for every single game I'm interested in. So I turn to written reviews from writers and outlets I know I can trust.
And sometimes it can be fun to read reviews! A good take down of a terrible game can be hilarious. A review about a game the writer has a strong personal connection to can be insightful (e.g. Austin Walker's review of Galak-Z on this very site).
So I don't know what everyone in this thread is on about. Maybe they have infinite time to watch gameplay videos. Or maybe every game they play is amazing. Or maybe they hate thoughtful discussion on games. I don't know.
So anyway OP, let me ACTUALLY answer your question. Usually I read:
Game Informer
Polygon
Giant Bomb
This is obviously contingent on the person writing the review, as there are folks from each establishment that I agree with more than others.
Edit: I also have really like Waypoint so far, though they don't really write formal reviews, so I didn't include them in my list
Edit2: I wrote this rant when there were 3 replies to this post, and they were all variations on "meh, reviews, who needs em?!" So sorry if it seems like I flipped my lid a bit
Log in to comment