@Kovie said:
While I've never had the impression that the wiki is intended to be purely objective and formal, having content that clearly expresses the writer's opinion, usually in a petty-sounding way, is too much.
But this does make me wonder if I'm allowed to call a game broken. Opinions?
If the game is legitimately broken I don't see why not. Maybe you should check to see if the game was ever fixed? Write a paragraph detailing its previous brokenness, if that's the case?
Log in to comment