Something went wrong. Try again later

Captainlunchbox

This user has not updated recently.

548 955 32 18
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

I roll my eyes every time this happens, Sega.(updated 9/23)

So Sega just announced a re-release of Sonic Adventure coming to the XBLA.I know, crazy, right? 
Sega re-re-re-re-re-releasing their mediocre blue mascot's formerly decent games is really starting to just wear on me. It's so sad. It's as if Sega keeps pleading it's case like a sweaty, nervous drug addict begging for more money- "Hey, guys, uh remember when we were good?! Please remember when we were good..."  
And even worse? People eat that shit up. They do. They buy it. Does nobody still have a Genesis or a Dreamcast laying around anymore? Really? You've gotta go give Sega another 10 or 20 bucks so they can keep pulling this shit? So they don't have to come up with new ideas or actually be good enough at what they do that they shouldn't have to be playing on our nostalgia? Come on.  
And they keep talking like this new XBLA episodic game they're coming out with is this new revelation. Like Sonic is finally back or something. The Sonic Advance game and the SOnic Rush games are pure Sonic games and are actually quite decent. Well decent until you realize that the Sonic games always just devolve into a speedy platformer on auto-pilot with  a boss fight at the end. 
 
 
Update 9/23: 
So I just listened to the Bombcast and wow, they really trashed SA. Not just because it sucks, but because Sega wants you to pay an extra 5 bucks for the DX stuff that a lot of people thought was going to the the version they released. Sonic Adventure DX was not a piece of DLC originally, it was an entire game. The fact that they ported the original version and then expect people to pay for the "DX content" is super shitty. So have fun bending over and taking another one from Sega all the people who wasted their time defending this re-release.

78 Comments

78 Comments

Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@ch13696 said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, how much is Sonic Adventure and the DX content? If it comes out to like $10-15 then I think that's reasonable $20 would probably be pushing it. Reason being because I liked all the Sonic games from the first Sonic to Sonic Adventure. After the first Sonic Adventure, that's when it started getting weird. Look at it this way. At least they're not trying to re-release Sonic Heroes. I appreciate them re-releasing something that was actually a hit back then.  "
There's a version of the game that exists that is coded and produced as the complete package (Sonic DX for the Gamecube)- this is like a bad joke. And the fact that they haven't announced plans to reissue Sonic Heroes is not a comfort to me at all. All due respect.
Avatar image for cl60
CL60

17117

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By CL60

Am I the only one who thinks Sonic Adventure isn't THAT bad?

Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
SethPhotopoulos

5777

Forum Posts

3465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By SethPhotopoulos
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @ch13696 said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, how much is Sonic Adventure and the DX content? If it comes out to like $10-15 then I think that's reasonable $20 would probably be pushing it. Reason being because I liked all the Sonic games from the first Sonic to Sonic Adventure. After the first Sonic Adventure, that's when it started getting weird. Look at it this way. At least they're not trying to re-release Sonic Heroes. I appreciate them re-releasing something that was actually a hit back then.  "
There's a version of the game that exists that is coded and produced as the complete package (Sonic DX for the Gamecube)- this is like a bad joke. And the fact that they haven't announced plans to reissue Sonic Heroes is not a comfort to me at all. All due respect. "
You could probably get DX and all those games on the gamecube/Wii for a cheap ass price but to Captainlunchbox being a dick to the people who were defending it since we thought it would be a straight up port and not the rip off it is is really fucking childish.  Especially when we didn't know 2 weeks ago that it would be in this condition.
Avatar image for starfoxa
StarFoxA

5262

Forum Posts

260822

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 12

Edited By StarFoxA

I've never played Sonic Adventure, or any Dreamcast games for that matter, so I think it's great that they're releasing content on XBLA.

Avatar image for lemoncookie01
Lemoncookie01

1663

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Lemoncookie01

Sonic Adventure is one of those games that in my mind's eye play great but when I boot them up...... :| disappointment.

Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
SethPhotopoulos

5777

Forum Posts

3465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By SethPhotopoulos
@StarFoxA said:
" I've never played Sonic Adventure, or any Dreamcast games for that matter, so I think it's great that they're releasing content on XBLA. "
I agree.  however the state that that specific game was ported in is a problem.  Hopefully they will do a better job with other games.
Avatar image for ch13696
ch13696

4760

Forum Posts

204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By ch13696
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @ch13696 said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, how much is Sonic Adventure and the DX content? If it comes out to like $10-15 then I think that's reasonable $20 would probably be pushing it. Reason being because I liked all the Sonic games from the first Sonic to Sonic Adventure. After the first Sonic Adventure, that's when it started getting weird. Look at it this way. At least they're not trying to re-release Sonic Heroes. I appreciate them re-releasing something that was actually a hit back then.  "
There's a version of the game that exists that is coded and produced as the complete package (Sonic DX for the Gamecube)- this is like a bad joke. And the fact that they haven't announced plans to reissue Sonic Heroes is not a comfort to me at all. All due respect. "
Ok, well, is it good enough to pirate then? Because I have my mouse hovering over the Pirate Bay tab right now.
Avatar image for ch13696
ch13696

4760

Forum Posts

204

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

Edited By ch13696
@SethPhotopoulos said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @ch13696 said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, how much is Sonic Adventure and the DX content? If it comes out to like $10-15 then I think that's reasonable $20 would probably be pushing it. Reason being because I liked all the Sonic games from the first Sonic to Sonic Adventure. After the first Sonic Adventure, that's when it started getting weird. Look at it this way. At least they're not trying to re-release Sonic Heroes. I appreciate them re-releasing something that was actually a hit back then.  "
There's a version of the game that exists that is coded and produced as the complete package (Sonic DX for the Gamecube)- this is like a bad joke. And the fact that they haven't announced plans to reissue Sonic Heroes is not a comfort to me at all. All due respect. "
You could probably get DX and all those games on the gamecube/Wii for a cheap ass price but to Captainlunchbox being a dick to the people who were defending it since we thought it would be a straight up port and not the rip off it is is really fucking childish.  Especially when we didn't know 2 weeks ago that it would be in this condition. "
The problem I'm facing is that my Wii gives out a disc read error. I would go out and buy it, but can't. But, if it's a good enough game, I'll buy it on PSN. If not, then Pirate Bay I go.
Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
SethPhotopoulos

5777

Forum Posts

3465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By SethPhotopoulos
@ch13696: If the XBLA version was extremely choppy in it's framerate I don't see the PSN being any better.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@SethPhotopoulos said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @ch13696 said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, how much is Sonic Adventure and the DX content? If it comes out to like $10-15 then I think that's reasonable $20 would probably be pushing it. Reason being because I liked all the Sonic games from the first Sonic to Sonic Adventure. After the first Sonic Adventure, that's when it started getting weird. Look at it this way. At least they're not trying to re-release Sonic Heroes. I appreciate them re-releasing something that was actually a hit back then.  "
There's a version of the game that exists that is coded and produced as the complete package (Sonic DX for the Gamecube)- this is like a bad joke. And the fact that they haven't announced plans to reissue Sonic Heroes is not a comfort to me at all. All due respect. "
You could probably get DX and all those games on the gamecube/Wii for a cheap ass price but to Captainlunchbox being a dick to the people who were defending it since we thought it would be a straight up port and not the rip off it is is really fucking childish.  Especially when we didn't know 2 weeks ago that it would be in this condition. "
I wasn't being a dick to anyone, just saying that Sega is just pulling more shit and it's just a shame to this old Sonic fan. No hard feelings?
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@SethPhotopoulos said:
" @StarFoxA said:
" I've never played Sonic Adventure, or any Dreamcast games for that matter, so I think it's great that they're releasing content on XBLA. "
I agree.  however the state that that specific game was ported in is a problem.  Hopefully they will do a better job with other games. "
They're greedy, lazy, AND they can't port? It's worse than I thought then. It's one thing to port, it's another to do it poorly to make a quick buck on the poor saps who won't think twice before buying because they're blinded by nostalgia. Hope you weren't  a victim of that.
Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
SethPhotopoulos

5777

Forum Posts

3465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By SethPhotopoulos
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @SethPhotopoulos said:
" @StarFoxA said:
" I've never played Sonic Adventure, or any Dreamcast games for that matter, so I think it's great that they're releasing content on XBLA. "
I agree.  however the state that that specific game was ported in is a problem.  Hopefully they will do a better job with other games. "
They're greedy, lazy, AND they can't port? It's worse than I thought then. It's one thing to port, it's another to do it poorly to make a quick buck on the poor saps who won't think twice before buying because they're blinded by nostalgia. Hope you weren't  a victim of that. "
No.  If I have it why would I rebuy it.  I wasn't any way.  I don't buy old games on either network.
Avatar image for strubes
Strubes

86

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Strubes
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@Strubes said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though. "
I liked it back in the day, but games have simply gotten better. And if I wanted it, a physical copy for either GC or DC would be cheaper. Now, I'm not saying anyone's wrong for buying it, I'm just saying that Sega's play on fans' nostalgia is just getting manipulative now and there's no excuse to further the nickel-and-diming by charging extra for partial code. And as for re-releases, I would counter your point by saying I don't know of many high-quality, talented developers who do that.
Avatar image for sethphotopoulos
SethPhotopoulos

5777

Forum Posts

3465

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 8

Edited By SethPhotopoulos
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though. "
I liked it back in the day, but games have simply gotten better. And if I wanted it, a physical copy for either GC or DC would be cheaper. Now, I'm not saying anyone's wrong for buying it, I'm just saying that Sega's play on fans' nostalgia is just getting manipulative now and there's no excuse to further the nickel-and-diming by charging extra for partial code. And as for re-releases, I would counter your point by saying I don't know of many high-quality, talented developers who do that. "
Capcom, sony, nintendo, microsoft, bungie, snk guys, namco, etc.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox

...And all those developers put out more solid games year round on top of that and their rehashes are done pretty well. I have less of a problem with it if it's done with respect to the fans and a modicum of effort.

Avatar image for getz
Getz

3765

Forum Posts

1003

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 4

Edited By Getz
@OrigamiDriller said:
" Yes, Sega is the only company to re-release their past games.  If you are so upset about it, then don't buy it. But putting it out on the XBLA gives some people who never had the chance to play it before to give it a try.   It seems kind of silly that you're even mad, since you clearly cannot be appeased in the first place. You're upset with Sonic 4, a game they are finally trying to do right by, and you haven't even played it. "
Said it for me.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@Getz said:
" @OrigamiDriller said:
" Yes, Sega is the only company to re-release their past games.  If you are so upset about it, then don't buy it. But putting it out on the XBLA gives some people who never had the chance to play it before to give it a try.   It seems kind of silly that you're even mad, since you clearly cannot be appeased in the first place. You're upset with Sonic 4, a game they are finally trying to do right by, and you haven't even played it. "
Said it for me. "
Again, never claimed they were the only ones to do ti, just that they're infamous for doing it poorly and shamelessly. If Sega wasn't such a fucking letdown these days, or rather, since they let poor. sweet Dreamcast die, then I wouldn't have a problem.
Avatar image for strubes
Strubes

86

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Strubes
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though. "
I liked it back in the day, but games have simply gotten better. And if I wanted it, a physical copy for either GC or DC would be cheaper. Now, I'm not saying anyone's wrong for buying it, I'm just saying that Sega's play on fans' nostalgia is just getting manipulative now and there's no excuse to further the nickel-and-diming by charging extra for partial code. And as for re-releases, I would counter your point by saying I don't know of many high-quality, talented developers who do that. "
However much I disagree with the last sentence..lol..I will say that this is easier for those who don't have a Gamecube or Wii to play Sonic DX on and want to enjoy it. Sure you could just get it on a Gamecube....if you have one. If not, you're looking at spending $30 for a Gamecube, and another $10-$15 for a solid copy of the game which A. Will probably be scratched to hell, or B. Not have the original case and/or manual. Those are issues for me. However, like stated before, the added trophy support warrants the minuscule extra price for me. However, unlike most people who are responding to you with harsh words, I enjoy a solid debate.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@Strubes said:

" @Captainlunchbox said:

" @Strubes said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though. "
I liked it back in the day, but games have simply gotten better. And if I wanted it, a physical copy for either GC or DC would be cheaper. Now, I'm not saying anyone's wrong for buying it, I'm just saying that Sega's play on fans' nostalgia is just getting manipulative now and there's no excuse to further the nickel-and-diming by charging extra for partial code. And as for re-releases, I would counter your point by saying I don't know of many high-quality, talented developers who do that. "
However much I disagree with the last sentence..lol..I will say that this is easier for those who don't have a Gamecube or Wii to play Sonic DX on and want to enjoy it. Sure you could just get it on a Gamecube....if you have one. If not, you're looking at spending $30 for a Gamecube, and another $10-$15 for a solid copy of the game which A. Will probably be scratched to hell, or B. Not have the original case and/or manual. Those are issues for me. However, like stated before, the added trophy support warrants the minuscule extra price for me. However, unlike most people who are responding to you with harsh words, I enjoy a solid debate. "
 I should clarify that I was speaking on the lack of effort on Sega's part when it comes to re-doing its games, not necessarily the re-releasing itself. My other point being that Sonic Adventure is not some timeless treasure or a gold-standard for any genre. It was good for its time, and even that is debatable. My point was just that there's a cheaper way to enjoy a mediocre game if you really, really want to and have the means to.  Keep in mind, also, to counter-point your argument that not everyone has a current console. I'd argue that people having a Dreamcast and/or a Gamecube laying around is pretty common. I have both. I know you personally have a DC, (...and a copy of SA... what are you doing...lol) so I don't see how my suggestion was any less reasonable than yours.  
 
And another thing I've felt is that with all this negative press and actually seeing the game again, it's starting to sour my happy memories and kind of really bum me out.  
 
Also, I have to say that other forumites should learn from your example of a gentleman's conduct when it comes to an internet debate instead of being typical internet users.    
Avatar image for strubes
Strubes

86

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Strubes
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes said:

" @Captainlunchbox said:

" @Strubes said:
" @Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes: Check the Bombcast- you gotta pay a fee for the DX content. Total bullshit. "
Well, I ended up getting it. And I don't feel robbed at all. With challenging trophies added to an already fun game, it just more than warranted the purchase. At least for me. But like it's been said time and time again, I can't think of too many developers who DON'T re-release games for a quick buck. The price may be debatable though. "
I liked it back in the day, but games have simply gotten better. And if I wanted it, a physical copy for either GC or DC would be cheaper. Now, I'm not saying anyone's wrong for buying it, I'm just saying that Sega's play on fans' nostalgia is just getting manipulative now and there's no excuse to further the nickel-and-diming by charging extra for partial code. And as for re-releases, I would counter your point by saying I don't know of many high-quality, talented developers who do that. "
However much I disagree with the last sentence..lol..I will say that this is easier for those who don't have a Gamecube or Wii to play Sonic DX on and want to enjoy it. Sure you could just get it on a Gamecube....if you have one. If not, you're looking at spending $30 for a Gamecube, and another $10-$15 for a solid copy of the game which A. Will probably be scratched to hell, or B. Not have the original case and/or manual. Those are issues for me. However, like stated before, the added trophy support warrants the minuscule extra price for me. However, unlike most people who are responding to you with harsh words, I enjoy a solid debate. "
 I should clarify that I was speaking on the lack of effort on Sega's part when it comes to re-doing its games, not necessarily the re-releasing itself. My other point being that Sonic Adventure is not some timeless treasure or a gold-standard for any genre. It was good for its time, and even that is debatable. My point was just that there's a cheaper way to enjoy a mediocre game if you really, really want to and have the means to.  Keep in mind, also, to counter-point your argument that not everyone has a current console. I'd argue that people having a Dreamcast and/or a Gamecube laying around is pretty common. I have both. I know you personally have a DC, (...and a copy of SA... what are you doing...lol) so I don't see how my suggestion was any less reasonable than yours.   And another thing I've felt is that with all this negative press and actually seeing the game again, it's starting to sour my happy memories and kind of really bum me out.   Also, I have to say that other forumites should learn from your example of a gentleman's conduct when it comes to an internet debate instead of being typical internet users.     "
Ah yes, I understand your points. But for me, nostalgia with added trophies sealed the deal for me. And I was just saying if people don't have Gamecubes or Dreamcasts in which to play this game, I don't see anything wrong with them enjoying the game now. But if you know me, you know me paying $15 for this is not too far out of reach..haha. However, I do have an issue with the constant $15 pricing of downloadable games. And for that, nearly everyone is guilty. Sega included. I feel $10 for this would have been sufficient.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox

 @Strubes:
 $15 being the price point sucks for 2 reasons- That game was not refined in any way to warrant that price and for the fact that it's like some kind of standard. If Sega had made some much needed tweaks to the camera, control, graphics, sound, and not been total bastards about the DX content- then maybe $5. Maybe. But I guess there's easy money to be made in exploiting the old fans.     

Avatar image for strubes
Strubes

86

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Strubes
@Captainlunchbox said:
"  @Strubes:  $15 being the price point sucks for 2 reasons- That game was not refined in any way to warrant that price and for the fact that it's like some kind of standard. If Sega had made some much needed tweaks to the camera, control, graphics, sound, and not been total bastards about the DX content- then maybe $5. Maybe. But I guess there's easy money to be made in exploiting the old fans.      "
If they tweaked the graphics or sound in any way, I'd be pissed. I'd hate for them to ruin the classic I love so. Good thing is, the trophies actually make me want to play it longer than I normally would. Getting all 130 emblems and unlocking Metal Sonic is going to take some time. However, I'm prepared for a slew of these kinds of blogs from you since Sega is releasing more Dreamcast games for download in the future, with added trophy support and, hopefully, no other changes. But, I won't hate. Since we're going to PAX and all. :D
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@Strubes:  
See, I meant tweak as in improve, which this game could definitely benefit from. I don't understand why improvement would upset you.
Avatar image for strubes
Strubes

86

Forum Posts

101

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 4

Edited By Strubes
@Captainlunchbox said:
" @Strubes:  See, I meant tweak as in improve, which this game could definitely benefit from. I don't understand why improvement would upset you. "
I don't believe you ever will either...lol. Sure, some minor improvements like making the second analog useful would be nice, but it's nothing I need.
Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@Strubes:  
I just.... miss Old Sega... :'(... Hold me
Avatar image for scapegoatsqueal
scapegoatsqueal

8

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 3

Edited By scapegoatsqueal

THE COLORS FEEL SO RIIIIIGGGHT!
 
...Also, SA 1 & 2 are epic, whatever console they get ported to.

Avatar image for captainlunchbox
Captainlunchbox

548

Forum Posts

955

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 20

Edited By Captainlunchbox
@scapegoatsqueal said:
" THE COLORS FEEL SO RIIIIIGGGHT!  ...Also, SA 1 & 2 are epic, whatever console they get ported to. "
Good for their time? Sure? Epic? Not so much. Game design has just gotten better in every sense since then.