@Osaladin said:
Why do people have to be so overly defensive for the GB staff?
Because the GB crew doesn't adress the many people who overstate their opinions over and over again. They know better, plus it would be a herculean task. But of course they almost always read the comments to some extent and the defenders imagine how it feels to be greeted with harsh criticism or all out vitriol. Then they feel they need to play good-cop, or all-out riot-cop.
I think 99% of this community could agree that there is both too much bashing and defending on this site. But hey, we are "engaged". And that's what counts in the long run.
In this case, I tend to agree with the defenders, 'cause I think this issue is overstated when taking many comment sections and blog post into account. But if the complaints aren't adressed, how can I blame a paying member for reiterating their issue? I can't. So usually I just read the comments --- get a twinge of frustration with the level of discourse --- feel like going on a keyboard tirade --- don't for reasons that range between "who gives a fuck" to "my point has probably been stated somewhere in this mess I don't want to trudge through" --- then move on with my day.
But your question intrigued me, however rhetorical it may have been intended. And so I bit. Enjoy :)
Log in to comment