Something went wrong. Try again later

duxup

This user has not updated recently.

372 139 40 31
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

duxup's forum posts

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By duxup
clubsandwich said:
"duxup said:
"IMO people can both wear shorts and a bikini and take issue with what they think of as objectifying women."
that's double standards to me. "
How so?

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By duxup
Lemegeton said:
"Hamz said:


That being said i think some people do need to chill out and cut back in the "omg Kristin and Gamespot are fucking idiots for doing this" type of comments. Plenty of people express opinions we do not agree with, advocate or generally like but that doesn't mean we have the right to come out and insult them because of it. I think too many people like to hate on Gamespot because its Gamespot and they just follow the crowd.

But on a totally unrelated note i still think they need to persuade Jody Robinson to have more camera time on the live shows, that girl is pretty on the eyes and amazing at her job.

Viva la Jody!"
well said. while i dont respect gamespot anymore editorially because i don't like most of the new staff, there are still some good guys like mechberg there and all the gamespot hate is total nonsense. i know a lot of the anti-gamespot stuff comes from the jeff saga but that was more CNET who were responsible for that and not the GS staff that are still there.
and yeah jody ftw.
"
Yar there is plenty of good stuff / people at GS that are worth reading / watching. 
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By duxup

IMO people can both wear shorts and a bikini and take issue with what they think of as objectifying women.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By duxup
Knives said:
"duxup said:
"Knives said:
Yes, they'll make more money by splitting SC2 up. But they'll also be able to get the game out faster, and that is a fact. It is a win/win for everyone except the poor.
Blizzard has never had a problem delaying a game until they're done, suddenly they have to break up a game to get it out.   How nice of them... to find a way to make more money.
"
I suppose that's the cynical way of looking at it. Answer me this, you can choose one of two options:

A) Starcraft 2 comes out tomorrow for $100.
B) Starcraft 2 comes out a year from now for $50.

Which would you pick? A or B? I think you'll find that most would pay more to have the game come out sooner, which is what we're getting."
I'll happily save $50 later for the whole game.

I have no doubt this is a sound business decision for them.  They could sell a box with a rock in it and they'd make tons of money.

The concern in this thread being is that Blizzard was one of those companies you could count on putting out a quality product every time, and they didn't rummage around in your wallet after you bought the product looking for a way to get the rest of your money with the product you already bought.  SC2, and these PR spinish excuses for breaking up the game seems to be pointing in the direction of the latter and that is disappointing.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By duxup
Knives said:
Yes, they'll make more money by splitting SC2 up. But they'll also be able to get the game out faster, and that is a fact. It is a win/win for everyone except the poor.
Blizzard has never had a problem delaying a game until they're done, suddenly they have to break up a game to get it out.   How nice of them... to find a way to make more money.
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By duxup

Those signs are not looking good.

The excuses are what really worry me.  They didn't want to delay the game... since when has Blizzard ever worried about delaying a game?  It is a win win for the player because it is going to have a lot more content (except it is just more campaign missions).... and we have to buy each game to play each faction.   Oh and they're just going to happen to make a pile more money this way.   Ominous.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#7  Edited By duxup

As long as they just avoid using the Oblivion leveling system.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By duxup

I like Steam a great deal.  I think they've got some great deals.

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By duxup

I am, but the game badly needs a patch. 

Avatar image for duxup
duxup

372

Forum Posts

139

Wiki Points

31

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By duxup

I've got a 360 and a Wii.  The Wii is different, that's fine with me.