@Neverpraying said:
@faustyn:So he really liked a game then reviewed it as average? o.O When I really like a game I review it as good if not really good >_>
That's calling Arkham City average, the game is above average, the only reasonable sane complaints have been things like, how the Riddler challenges are more skill this time and less mental, and the game is a little oddly paced, like how you may get really wrapped into the story then oh a side mission pops up and distracts you. I personally don't count the Catwoman thing as a reasonable complaint, because you can buy the game new and get it, or used at gamestop and both out comes get the code, or if you buy it used else where the Catwoman stuff is not really needed but if you really really like the game you can just buy it, sure the fact that they did not include the Catwoman stuff in game is stupid but it does not make the game stupid, or any less in my opinion.
Also you may note I said "sane" complaints, those were logical complaints, what are the non logical ones? Someone said this is basically Arkham Asylum that's harder to get around with new crappy gadgets, how is that not logical? Complaining about that is not logical because the game is a sequel so yes it will be very similar to the one before it, but instead it'll add new features and adjust things to make them more enjoyable, and have a new plot that continues the old one, that's like complaining all the die hard movies are similiar. Harder to get around? The developers said this will be an open world 5times larger then Arkham City with much more to do...so ya it's harder to get around, that's a stupid complaint because the person is just lazy, people like my self and numerous other people I know enjoy an open world environment with lots to do. Next matter new crappy gadgets? If you call a smoke pellet that allows you to get away from foes, a freeze grenade that freezes some foes that also makes water platforms, a gadget that disarms foes with guns without them knowing and some other gadgets crappy then I guess that's a good solid complaint... Someone called the game to silly and the chatter that you over hear from enemies is childish, and how they are an adult and would not stand for it, the person obviously making a stupid complaint and is an obvious troll.
Anyhow I'm done with my rant about Arkham City, needed to get that out of my system sorry. The massive build up from really bad complaints in reviews that give the game 4/10 or 6/10 had me needing to release some of that.
since when 8,5/10 is an average? it's a great score and even DC recognizes it as a positive one (link). i know that sites like IGN, GameSpot and Gametrailers, are the reason why everyone thinks that if a game is awesome it automatically means it should get a 10/10, but some people still use the whole review scale. EDGE is a great example of a magazine that still gives a shit about this stuff. Yahoo on the other hand, is a great example of a site that is trying to fuck it up even more (6/5 for Arkham City).
The catwoman stuff is annoying to Jim (at least according to his review and twitter feed) not because it kinda ruins the pacing of the game, but because it is an inconvenience for the customers, and he is one of them. you can't play your video game after putting the disc in. you have to enter a code, then download the content and after that you get to play. even though you bought the original copy, for your money, you're still treated like shit and have to jump through different hoops to enjoy your game. that's his complaint. i personally couldn't care less about entering codes since i buy all my games new, (there are only a couple of places in Warsaw with used games and the prices are stupid) but i can see how people can be furious about it.
btw. someone really gave batman 4/10?! can you give me a link?
Log in to comment