fmprodguy

You have two seperate problems. There is something wrong with the ps4 is it's not going to sleep mode and staying there call sony tech ASAP!

The download speed is sony's network. I have both xb1 and ps4, say what u will abou ms, but they have a better network. downloads are way faster. day one patch on ps4 took almost an hour for 300+ mb, xb2 took less than 20 for 400+... Besides the network I love them both so far! Bring on infamous and titianfall!!

Wow haters gonna hate huh.

(insert slightly lame, populous, "can't we all get along" style phrase here.)

@Vampir said:

@fmprodguy said:

How could you fall for leading more hits to an internet Troll?!

Hate, Love, or indifferent to the Halo franchise, or Halo 4, he gave it a 20... yes 20 out of 100.

Carnival Games, Fn Carnival Games didn't get a lower score FROM anyone than a 49!!!!

Naughty Bears, a semi broken game didn't get lower than a 43!

Plus it's not a well articulated point, his complaints would fairly apply to all Call of Duties since 4, Gears of War, New Super Mario, Mario, Zelda (well a little bit at least), and God of War. Oh Nos, they didn't reinvent the wheel when changing developers... and it still feels like the game who's name is on the box... I'll give it a 20!

The only reason to score a Tripple A game, for being like the game it is a sequel to, and that IS NOT broken, below the score of broken games and far far below the average is to get attention, hits, and start a flame war with the only goal to get more attention or hits to your site.

I own and love all three consoles, this is not about Halo, xbox360, PS3, Wii, fanboy-ism.... It's about calling out BS

Bummed you fell for the BS Patrick.

Or maybe he's just using a 100 point rating system in a way that makes some amount of sense. What purpose is there to having a range of 100 points if even universally reviled games like Carnival Games and Naughty Bears get scores in the 40s. What does being AAA matter if you don't like the game?

You wouldn't expect a movie to get a decent rating just because it was big-budget, and I see no reason that should be true about video games either.

Hmmm, out of context rationalization.

The fact that a game is a "Tripple A" doesn't get it a good score. The point was that scoring a super high profile game lower than broken games and phoned in minigames collections, is opportunistic at best.

For example, plenty of people can say they thought The Avengers was not a good movie. Everyone is more than allowed an opinion, and their own view on what is good and bad. A published "Review" though is placing yourself up on the pedestal and saying that this is MORE than opinion.

Just check the Dictionary:

re·view

[ri-vyoo] Show IPA

noun1.

acriticalarticleorreport, asinaperiodical,onabook,play,recital,orthelike;critique;evaluation.

How could you fall for leading more hits to an internet Troll?!

Hate, Love, or indifferent to the Halo franchise, or Halo 4, he gave it a 20... yes 20 out of 100.

Carnival Games, Fn Carnival Games didn't get a lower score FROM anyone than a 49!!!!

Naughty Bears, a semi broken game didn't get lower than a 43!

Plus it's not a well articulated point, his complaints would fairly apply to all Call of Duties since 4, Gears of War, New Super Mario, Mario, Zelda (well a little bit at least), and God of War. Oh Nos, they didn't reinvent the wheel when changing developers... and it still feels like the game who's name is on the box... I'll give it a 20!

The only reason to score a Tripple A game, for being like the game it is a sequel to, and that IS NOT broken, below the score of broken games and far far below the average is to get attention, hits, and start a flame war with the only goal to get more attention or hits to your site.

I own and love all three consoles, this is not about Halo, xbox360, PS3, Wii, fanboy-ism.... It's about calling out BS

Bummed you fell for the BS Patrick.

Hmmm, sorry I was hopping for more. Not hardware wise, or even software announce wise, but I was hopping Nintendo would not rely on a novelty again. The only think in the launch trailer they showed that seemed like a realistic product was Zelda.

The concept is good, none of us will know if the hardware is good for a while, but the general direction seems to me the same as the Wii... all neet ideas, no substance... Unlike the DS, a new idea with real substance...

If all true, THIS is what GAMEROOM was suposta be. 
 
(a bit lat, but)  
YEA!