FoolishChaos's forum posts

#1 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

Yup I really enjoy watching DotA as well. I need a good commentator to go along with it, though.

#2 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

@benspyda said:

"Dynamic clothing damage which sees the girls’ garments get ripped from their bodies mid-combat."- Senran Kagura Burst gameplay feature

I have no problem with a game like Senran Kagura Burst existing and people enjoying it, that's perfectly fine. But Dragon's Crown was an amazing game that was hindered by it's portayal of woman, which was just unfortunate. It's like if a game with great gameplay came out but the main characters all had their dicks hanging out the whole time, that'd be a bummer.

Rust (well I can't speak to the quality of the game, but everyone has their dicks out all the time). Can you imagine the utter shitstorm that game would garner if it was naked women instead of men?

But instead its just kind of funny

#3 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

I played a bit of Ultra Business Tycoon III because of this article. Its fantastic. Some great writing in there

#4 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

@sammo21 said:

Like @mariachimacabre said, the battlenet forums have been awful almost as far back as the World of Warcraft beta. I trust nothing that comes from that place. I am 100% sure the stability of the product will be fine when the game comes out.

The one thing I would definately not be 100% sure about when it comes to diablo 3 is stability on release

#5 Edited by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

Well its a pretty slow time for vidia games right now. Maybe they could take a page from patrick and do it more often than once a week

#6 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

@gnatsol said:

@markini6 said:
@gnatsol said:

That looks..... AMAZING!!!!!!!!!!! :O

That was nothing like COD. Just because it's also a FPS doesn't mean they're the same. Why people still expect completely unique gameplay from hyped up games is beyond me. Advances like that won't exist this generation/current hardware.

On the contrary, I'd say that it looked very much like COD with mechs and parkour, but not that that's a bad thing.

Also, whilst not for every game, I don't see why one should't hope for games that have completely unique gameplay, it's one of the most interesting and exciting aspects of gaming's evolution.

Please go into detail how it's so similar to COD other than the fact that you're shooting from eye-sight and it's on hardpoint mode.

Small player counts with fast, arcadey combat. The guns are very fast to ADS.

Battlefield has a hardpoint style mode and eye-sight aiming, but it feels like a completely different game. From the footage, this is far closer to CoD. Not that its a bad thing. people seem to take that the wrong way when they hear it

#7 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

I haven't seriously played a CoD since MW2. I do like those games, they just haven't been different enough to get me interested. This looks different enough!

#8 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

@patrickklepek: Thank you! You've been a huge GB content creator lately. Loving your enthusiasm

#9 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

Asteroids

#10 Posted by FoolishChaos (428 posts) -

@valeo said:

How can you even know if you want more players in a match before playing the game though?

Because every FPS is the same, and everyone who has played an FPS knows exactly the number of players any FPS should have

In all seriousness, as someone who loved GoW's low player count Multi, im sure this will be fine guys. chill