gbrading's forum posts

#1 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

It's excellent that games like this are being preserved, irrelevant of the legality. Old games need saving for future generations, and the Internet Archive are going down the right path. The emulation technology is still in early stages and some of the games are still missing sound or have bugged sound (like all of the Sega Genesis games) but hopefully given enough time they'll get them all working fine.

#2 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

Really surprised Jazzpunk was Alex's favourite game. It doesn't take itself seriously and I suppose perhaps that is its greatest strength.

#3 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

And Jeff came back into the Call of Duty fold.

#4 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

Assassin's Creed really needs to win the Take A Break Award from GB this year. I'd love to run around Victorian London but I'd prefer to do it two years from now and give Assassin's Creed some breathing room.

#5 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

This is a really good set of rules Steam have come up with; the question is will they actually enforce them?

#6 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

Ubisoft have long tried to strongarm players into doing what they want them to do; remember the Online Services Platform which forced you to play singleplayer games online? When AC 2 launched you had to be connected constantly. At least they were dissuaded from doing that, but Uplay is a less than preferable alternative.

Why do Ubisoft keep doing it? People keep buying their games! It's as simple as that. If Ubisoft feels they can get away with it, they'll do it, no hesitation.

#7 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

Ubisoft's PC support has been very bad for a long while (remember, their Chief Executive said 95% of PC players were pirates). I'm not surprised they might be following in EA's footsteps and forcing people onto their little bit of software and off Steam. Nonetheless, it is irritating for the consumer who wants to have all their games in one place. Steam's authority must be challenged of course, but only through games sales, and Green Man Gaming and Humble Bundle do this very well. Uplay and Origin will always be surplus to requirements.

#8 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

Mr. Carpenter is always a good sport.

#9 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

The letterboxing is purely and entirely a technical choice, I don't buy any aesthetic arguments (because personally, I think letterboxing makes stuff look like it was made in 1965). If it were aesthetic, it wouldn't be possible to do what you can do in the PC version: To run the game at a higher FPS and remove the letterboxing. Understandably Bethesda don't recommend doing this because the performance tanks (because they couldn't be bothered to make a 60 FPS fullscreen PC port). The Order: 1886 is going to do the exact same thing, for the exact same reasons.

Arguments for low framerates and letterboxing usually talk about making the game more cinematic or film-like, crucially missing one massively important point: It's a bloody game. We're not watching a film, we're playing a game, we want to swing the camera around to see everything. If it were a film I wouldn't need to twist my vision to see what was happening.

#10 Posted by gbrading (2185 posts) -

What you say on the Internet matters, and a surprisingly high number of people need to come to terms with that. The ongoing controversy is testament to that.