@RecSpec said:
I hate how this is a story because the guy failed at his goal, only getting nobody sources to bite.
I agree. If anything, this guy proved that:
1) Obviously there are going to be untrustworthy sites that bite. That's why nobody visits those sites and or has never heard of them
2) No sites with a respected reputation published his lies, proving that the sites posting the rumors we keep hearing aren't likely just making things up.
He seem to have accomplished the opposite of what he wanted to do.
Log in to comment