Huey2k2's forum posts

#1 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

I think the majority of this is due to people not fully understand what their kickstarter money was for.

When you give money to a kickstarter project, you are doing nothing more then being a nice person who wants to donate a few bucks to an idea in the hopes that idea will take off an be a real tangible thing one day.

While I do think it is shitty, and possibly unethical, for someone to take a kickstarter idea and sell it off to a huge company for millions/billions of dollars... it is entirely within their right to do it, and they owe you absolutely nothing for it.

This kind of stuff is exactly the reason why I have not/will not ever give any money to anything on kickstarter. I don't like the idea of giving money for something that I might never get anything in return for.

BUT, if you are the kind of person who does give people money on kickstarter, and you seriously never expected that something like this would happen. You are delusional and naive.

#2 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

My Wii.

#3 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

Every time I have ever been invaded it is by someone who is significantly higher level then me soul and gear wise, and I never win.

At this point I just assume it means death, which is why I try to play most of the game as hollow.

#4 Edited by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

Works just fine for me with DSFix.

When you say you tried removing GFWL what exactly do you mean?

#5 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

@pezen:

You're talking about speed limits that were decided 50 or 60 years ago when cars were nowhere near as safe as they are now, and there was nowhere near as much traffic on the road is there is now.

Cars are infinitely more safe then they were at the time speed limits were created, and honestly they need to be raised in most places. If it was really as unsafe as you claim for people to drive over the speed limit, there would be a much larger crackdown on people speeding then there is.

In fact it is more unsafe to drive slow then it is to drive with traffic.

But hey, do whatever makes you happy.

#6 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

@pezen:

I'm sorry but in what world does driving with traffic make you an "idiot"?

If general traffic is going faster then the speed limit, is is more dangerous to go slow then it is to go at the same speed of the traffic. I don't see how you can logically think anything different. Feel free to drive at whatever speed you want, but don't sit there and pretend that going with traffic is not safer then going noticeably slower then traffic is.

#7 Edited by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

@zaxex said:

@huey2k2 said:

@zeyepawdz said:

VIDEO GAMES.

DOTA really shouldn't count, but what do I know?

I don't see how you can say DOTA2 shouldn't count.

It's his favourite game of the year. You can not like it, that's totally fine, but to suggest it doesn't count is wrong.

I think it's more that Dota 2 has been played since 2011. If we're leaving GOTY stuff that wide open - I played the original Bioshock again this year, and that would top my list again. Actual release date is pretty irrelevant if people have been playing for years already.

People can do what they like, but it seems redundant to name older games that you've played this year too in these lists.

It was officially released this year.

It is a game that came out in 2013.

It is Brads favourite game that released in 2013.

Yes, people have been playing it since 2011, but it was in beta at that point.

Actual release date is 100% relevant, if I was in the Warlords of Draenor beta I wouldn't put it on a game of the year list. A game isn't out until it is out.

#8 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

VIDEO GAMES.

DOTA really shouldn't count, but what do I know?

I don't see how you can say DOTA2 shouldn't count.

It's his favourite game of the year. You can not like it, that's totally fine, but to suggest it doesn't count is wrong.

#9 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

Even if Wii U sales don't pick up, they still have the massively successful 3DS.

@huey2k2 said:

To all the people jumping on him saying it will never happen.

There was a time when people thought that Sega ever going third party was crazy and would never happen, but here we are.

Sega had several failed consoles behind them, all one after another and very few big name games to help keep them going aside from Sonic. People like to point to Sega as an example of what could happen to Nintendo, but they're radically different situations and the comparison only helps to show how well Nintendo are doing (compared to Sega, obviously the Wii U is in trouble). There's much more chance of Microsoft dropping out of the console business, if you only want to look at numbers. The only reason they're still here is because they're determined to create a foothold and they can survive not making any profit to achieve that.

I am not disagreeing.

I said it was unlikely to happen, it is just crazy to outright dismiss it, because Nintendo like any other company is not going to last forever.

#10 Posted by Huey2k2 (475 posts) -

To all the people jumping on him saying it will never happen.

There was a time when people thought that Sega ever going third party was crazy and would never happen, but here we are.

I am not saying it will happen, or that I have any insight about the future of Nintendo, but to outright dismiss it is silly.

Is it likely? Of course not.

Is it possible? Of course.