Something went wrong. Try again later

imad81

This user has not updated recently.

118 0 38 7
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

imad81's forum posts

Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By imad81
@Lind_L_Taylor said:

" @imad81 said:

" @Popogeejo said:

" Isn't this kind of a non-issue any way? In theory it can be done but there's no incentive to do it for those few who can do it.NK has no means to put a nuke in the wrong place, let alone the right place and no other country has any interest in doing something like that to the US. Any terrorist organisation would have the same problem as NK. "

Well Pakistan has nukes..and a significant portion of its territory is controlled by the Taliban(mostly the border shared with afganistan). Imagine a scenario(which is not far-fetched) in which the taliban takes over pakistan and controls the nukes, one could find its way across to the US. "
Past & current theories are that India & Pakistan would more than likely nuke each other before the US was ever involved. You ever read McCammon's Swan Song?  The start of that  book starts with Pakistan & India blowing each other away with nuclear hellfire..that was back in the 80s.  From what I know about it, Ghandi created Pakistan in an  attempt to segregate Muslims from Hindus, but it didn't  really pan out.  The Hindus were very upset by Ghandi's decision & he was assassinated by a Hindu because of it. This was told to me by an Indian fellow.   They've been on the brink ever since.  That being the case, they are not as tied to electricity as a developed nation...although I'm sure that is changing, just not sure of the pace, due to finite resource constraints. "
 You are right and wrong at the same time. Right in the sense that its definitely more likely that India and pakistan will go to war with each other first (as long as both have actual governments running them) before the US is involved.  In this scenario, there is absoliutely no doubt about it, but it is unlikely, because none of these countries actually have the balls to start a nuclear war(unless its an act of retaliation e.g. if a repeat of the 26/11 Bombay attacks occurs).
 
But everything changes once the taliban(backed by al-qaeda) take over pakistan.
 
It is worth asking yourself, who does the taliban have a bigger strife with, the US or India? Also keep in mind that the leader of al-qaeda is(according to most reports) in hiding somewhere in the border regions of pakistan. A scenario in which the Taliban takes over pakistan, there is a slightly more chance that they will attack the US first. 
 
The part where you are absolutely wrong is the claim that Gandhi(not Ghandi..sorry, but I had to point that out) was the one to initiate the partition of India and Pakistan. It was actually initiated by JInnah(the father of Pakistan or the equivalent of Gandhi in Pakistan) and an indian politician called Nehru.   
 
P.S. I enjoyed reading your post. Lets keep the discussion going!
Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By imad81
@Popogeejo said:

" Isn't this kind of a non-issue any way? In theory it can be done but there's no incentive to do it for those few who can do it.NK has no means to put a nuke in the wrong place, let alone the right place and no other country has any interest in doing something like that to the US. Any terrorist organisation would have the same problem as NK. "

Well Pakistan has nukes..and a significant portion of its territory is controlled by the Taliban(mostly the border shared with afganistan). Imagine a scenario(which is not far-fetched) in which the taliban takes over pakistan and controls the nukes, one could find its way across to the US.
Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By imad81

 Hey everyone.

I am not a very active member on the forums so most of you may not know me. So allow me to introduce myself. I am 29yr old guy currently pursuing my residency in radiology(a branch of medicine). I live and work in Sg(I probably shouldnt mention this but what the hey!). I have been a gamer most of my life and my most vivid memory is playing Mortal Kombat 2 at my friends place. My first gaming system was an Atari 2600 and I played it to its well-deserved demise. 

I know a lot of people who hate my profession, and I dont blame them. I cant get my dad to see his physician on a regular basis, because that doctor is an arrogant <insert expletive here>.

But this is not about medicine, its about being a gamer and how it helps me, in my work.

- My hand eye cordination is top-notch! Thank you MW2. Helps a lot while doing procedures.

- Playing MMO's has helped me remember more, like "what was that character's story arc?" Instead of opening the quest log, I would try to remember it. It has helped me quite a bit with studies.

- And believe it or not, most people in my hospital play games a lot. So its a great way to meet residents from other departments on the weekend.

So yeah, I am happy to be a gamer. And I dont know why the media looks down upon gamers..I could probably speak my mind on it a little more, but I doubt anyone would read it.

Anyway, I look forward to getting to know more people on this site, so lets get to know about any new games you are looking forward to? Thoughts on what you're playing right now? I am looking forward to playing NFS:HP and just started Black ops today.

So anyway, hey again, and thanks for reading!

Cheers.  

Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By imad81

The Social Network
 
5/5
 
great soundtrack as well..expecially the nightclub scene where the music is amazing.

Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By imad81

If you are having trouble with the update, clear your system cache(My xbox > system settings > memory > press Y), turn off the xbox after clearing it and try applying the update again. I immediately got to the white screen amd it is downloading fine.

Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By imad81
@e102 said:

" In an effort to determine weather or not anyone except me actually plays this game I am starting this thread. If you've played it or know what it is then post below.  Seriously, how come more people don't play insanely complicated genre defying 4x/tower defence/rts games! "

Insert "English motherfucker! Do you speak it?" meme here..
 
edit: Also IMO tower defense games should be low stress..Real time strategy + Tower defense..jeez! How do you keep the ulcers at bay?
Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By imad81
@OperationTophat:  Download them..its easy and you can just queue up all the videos you want to watch..
Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By imad81

I have a 3GS and it runs the OS fine. However, I would definitely suggest that you skip the iphone 4 and get the next iteration of it, where I am sure a lot of the current problems will be resolved. But on the flip side, not having an iphone at all kinda sucks!!

Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By imad81
@Blair said:
" LSD, MDMA, Ketamine and Psilocybin Mushroom are all believed to have much more instantaneous and long lasting effects on the human brain than a traditional Anti-Depressant.  The negative side effects are also much more prevalent in Anti-Depressants. Moreover, most psychedelics target the release of Serotonin and not Dopamine, so their addictive properties are generally not as intense as Dopamine-releasing drugs.  I'm not a proponent of illicit drugs but it shows just how comparably-terrible most Anti-Depressants can be. "
The point you make is partially correct with respect to Dopamine, but increasing serotonin levels predisposes you to develop Schizophrenia(yikes!). And medically speaking, it is not the best idea to push a depressed person towards psychedelics, whatever the THEORETICAL advantages. 
 
And I agree Anti-depressants are not perfect, but consider the fact that at one time in the history of psychiatry, ALL mental illnesses were treated with Electro Convulsive Therapy(ECT), or in layman terms, strapping electrodes to the scalp and electrocuting the patient. 
 
@Lev said:
I don't like to consider psychedelics as "drugs"
Unfortunately, the rest of the world disagrees with you.
Avatar image for imad81
imad81

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

7

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By imad81
@Lev said:

 "many recent studies have shown suicidal thoughts are actually increased when you quit using them. "

Actually, the risk of  relapse is maximum within 6-9 months of starting medication. The risk of relapse is highest amongst those who have had 2 or more episodes of clinical depression in the past, in whom the Anti depressants are not discontinued(unless the patient stops taking them). I agree with you on the fact that SSRI's cant be abused, primarily because its effects are not instantaneous. It takes a variable peiod of time for different members of the SSRI drug class to act, varying between 2-4 weeks.
 
@Vonocourt said:

" I don't know how I feel about them. I'm on day three of my first experience,  and the first two days I just found myself in a even worse state. I know it's going to take a while before they start doing anything positive, but If it happens again today I'm gonna chuck the rest. "

Initially, they do make you feel worse and side effects like Nausea and restlessness develop during the first week. But soon you should be able to adjust to them,as most patients do, say within a week ranging upto 10-12 days maximum. 
 
@Korolev said:
 Some doctors have unfortunately, taken too much of a shine to anti-depressants, viewing every case as a case that needs medication. This leads to over-prescription, and over-use.  "
The reason for that is a term called 'defensive medicine'..its when I suspect a patient has condition X and refer him to a specialist for an evaluation. In the meantime however, till he gets to the specialist, the condition needs to be managed(especially in a condition like depression, where the risk of suicide increases exponentially the longer the patient waits)..this is to ward off any lawsuit that may occur in a situation where the patient doesnt go to the specialist.
 
@Pinworm45 said:
" The only thing I've ever seen anti-depressants do is give people the ability to self-masturbate and tell everyone how unique and interesting they are because they have had such a baaad life they're on anti-depressants.  So generally, they annoy me. It's also like ADHD. Some dude got dumped by his girlfriend and is crying about it for attention, so he must have "clinical depression!". Then they have an excuse to keep crying for attention. It's like ADHD in that it's extremely over diagnosed.  Anyway, I'll change my mind the day  1. People stop saying they are on anti-depressants as a way to gain sympathy or attention 2. The people on them are generally actually in need, unlike the vast majority of people I've seen 3. It becomes less over-diagnosed And most importantly, 4. I see some actual results of anti-depressants.  Edit: For the record, I was put on them once despite having no interest nor was I anything I would consider depressed, and they did exactly nothing. Maybe I'm biased. I still stand by what I think, as I've seen a lot of evidence. Of course, it doesn't apply to EVERYONE - but if you read my post, you're on them, and were offended, odds are I'd say it applies to you. "


No Caption Provided
LOL!!!
 
You need to get your facts straight..I can state for a FACT that depression is linked to decreased levels of 3 neurotransmitters, Dopamine, Serotonin and Nor adrenaline. In fact the risk of suicide correlates best with levels of dopamine in the brain. Unless you want to cut open every patients brain and analyse the tissue for these neurotransmitters, you have to believe that what the patient is experiencing is true (one of the first things taught in residency)..and hence labelling every patient with these complaints as a 'malingerer' is counter-productive and even dangerous.