Jethuty

I dont see how im an asshole for making a point but okay, sure. I like to think his whole arguement is rendered invalid for getting my name wrong but eh, guess not.

@Klei said:

@Jethuty said:

Im getting pretty god dang tired of "fuck old dante, huraaay new Dante" reverse strategy, trying to either get symphaty from like minded people(idiots imo) or stir up thr hate in the old fans. Stop it, seriously. Its been done a million times now and youre not bringing anything new to the discussion other than trying to rip up old wounds by now.

So basically, people who don't share your opinion (about not liking the current Dante) are idiots? You're a brilliant man, yes, you are.

Go do it in the other 12000 threads about this. and yes, more or less, mostly for the wrong reasons.

Thank you for acknowledging my brilliance.

Im getting pretty god dang tired of "fuck old dante, huraaay new Dante" reverse strategy, trying to either get symphaty from like minded people(idiots imo) or stir up thr hate in the old fans. Stop it, seriously. Its been done a million times now and youre not bringing anything new to the discussion other than trying to rip up old wounds by now.

You guys honestly dont think the smgs (pdw mostly) are OP as hell? Really?

Honestly, i cant see myself playing this much more if something doesnt get fixed. Your health is low, i get that, you die quickly, but the smgs are so overpowered you get instant killed in pretty much any encounter now.

The spawn points are miles better than mw3, but still bad. I have had several occasions where i was standing way back and someone spawned directly behind me, knife distance. Thats just fucking stupid.

While quickscopers might not get good scores(which i seen several do tho) its disrupting to your exeperince and ruins your streak. I feel that its too easy to utilize this time around.

Seriously fix the fucking smgs.

So my friends and i have been playing Blops 2 for 9 hours straight and already we started talking about balance. Obviously, its still very early, but we still think some of the points are valid. This is my take on it. 1. Your health is waaay too low. Either they should down the damage on all the guns across the board, or they should increase your health. As it is now, you die near instantly. Wether its your health, the firerate of the guns or just the damage output, i dunno, but it really needs to be tweaked. Add a juggernaught perk or something 2. Quickscoping is too strong. One sniper rifle in paticulor have almost zero recoil, good firerate and 1 hit kill anywhere on the body. They need to remove that shit asap. 3. The ghost(assassin) perk is first unlocked at level 55(last level). Whats up with that? You cant move anywhere without getting shot in the back now. 4. Scorestreak needs to be reworked, its confusing just exactly how many points you have and how many you need to get the next streak. 5, spawn points are still bad, but i suppose thats not going to get changed. Do you guys agree? Or do you have anything to add?

@Seppli said:

@Jethuty said:

@Seppli said:

@Mikemcn said:

100 bucks for battlefield is too much for battlefield. I couldn't justify paying for premium.

Premium more than doubles content for multiplayer, as well as expands gameplay options in both directions of scale - from close quarters to freakishly large maps. For less than you paid for the core game. You could say, Premium is the Battlefield game Battlefield fans always wanted - tons and tons of multiplayer content - no coop and no campaign.

Are you working for EA or something?

Cause im a longtime fan and i never wanted premium

I sure wanted a Season Pass. I pushed for a Battlefield DLC Season Pass on the EA/UK forums, before it even was a thing in the industry. There's a 16+ pages long thread somewhere on this very topic, where-in I argued its benefits for the BF community, over disingenuous scheme's like BF:BC 2's 'free DLC' (there was some awesome original content given, but little and late - and most was just held-back map/mode variations of existing content).

I sure wanted this level of post-launch support, by both the publisher/developer and the community - didn't you? Because back in the day, with multiple expansion/boosters and no 'Season Pass' type of deal, the community got so clustered, that most expansions became quickly unviable. In the binary world Regular and Premium, there's what I suppose to be more than a million Premium players - we are legion, and we play BF3 - all of BF3. That's a healthy environment for an online gaming community to thrive in.

"I sure wanted this level of post-launch support"

yes, but not premium.

are you sure you dont work for EA?

@Blackout62 said:

@Kraznor said:

@Sparklykiss said:

There was a Fluttershy shirt in that Q&A.

SPEAK UP, WHO ARE YOU, BRONY.

Speaking.

Damn it, now we have to put you in witness protection before the anti-brony hunts you down. Great shirt though.

....f*cking bronies..

also please cut the Q&A section or atleast have somebody moderate it

@Seppli said:

@Mikemcn said:

100 bucks for battlefield is too much for battlefield. I couldn't justify paying for premium.

Premium more than doubles content for multiplayer, as well as expands gameplay options in both directions of scale - from close quarters to freakishly large maps. For less than you paid for the core game. You could say, Premium is the Battlefield game Battlefield fans always wanted - tons and tons of multiplayer content - no coop and no campaign.

Are you working for EA or something?

Cause im a longtime fan and i never wanted premium

That is really bad, doesnt follow the "spirit" of giant bomb and highly unoriginal. The helvetica font is used by EVERYONE when they want to look cool and hipster, dont use that(and dont use comic sans and papyrus either).

The colors need readjusting, like the red being much deeper, and the bomb text needs to be thick/bold.

The logo itself is fine, tho you should make the mouth white so there is a better contrast