but personal responsablity is in a great independent of the type of rule i think. At least more than greed.
While you are against that craddle into leadership, i'm not...
and while it is true that the power is getting more and more divided, it's also true that governments are as unstable, as they haven't been for a long long time.
So it's interesting to see if this decadence of rule will lead to a more open and divided democracy or instead lead to caos and some kind of fascist or monarchic rule.
" The royal family are given far more money than they need. Sure, they bring a lot of tourism to the country, so give them a decent amount of money to give them a decent life, but there is no need for the amount of money they get. "
but they become very cheap to support when compared with a parlament and a government, did you know that?
" I think monarchy is probrably better than the democracy, and i think the queen is better left where she is. Mainly because the queen and her family are brought up so they can exercise a position of some power. And as that, they are redier to assume it, that any other people. Granted that there can be better people to take it, but on a average a person that was taught since birth to lead is more prepared to do so. Also the queen is a role model. That was specially seen during the world war 2, being that one of the biggest reasons she still has a place in the english modern society. Also i think that a person being around power for so long, makes less inclined to abuse it. "
You have no idea of what you are speaking.Check the Royals history and then reconsider what proportion of them have been positive for this country compared to what proportion have been reckless, incompetent and wasteful with Britain's asset. What power is the Queen ready to assume ?The Queen does her best to stay away from any controversial issue because she does not have the skills to deal them and as if she was to voice an opinion - very likely she would be and probably justifiably be accused of hypocrisy because of the Royals history and questionable links with many organisations and questionable governments around the World. Anyone who believes that someone who is bred to rule as opposed to learn to rule as a result of varied life experiences; is seriously mistaken. "
hummm oposed to what?
the modern prudent, wise and economical rule of the parties?
Hummm, and i'm not english, but if i were i'd feel insulted, as she is very old, as with age you don't gain only rinkles. She is a very wise woman. Best that 99% of the politians around. She lived and also give heart to britain in the second world war.
And what type of government hasn't its' dose of hipocracy.
Democracy is not very democratic is you see closely too.
And politicians they don't even learn to lead mostly... they learn to lie. Then they try to rule.
Log in to comment