@Captain_Felafel: Yeah, I also think the headline was pretty terrible for the story in general, regardless of whether it spoiled anything.
jimmy5150's forum posts
Crotchety gamers across the internet became cranky when a number of gaming outlets spoiled a plot twist in the highly anticipated Batman: Arkham City. Some outlets put it right in the headline, while others hid it under the fold or within spoiler tags. I’m not here to criticize other outlets and how they handle coverage - especially when it comes from an event devoted to press and media attention. Instead I want to say that spoilers really aren’t the end of the world when it comes to video games.
Of all the mediums that could be affected by spoilers--books, TV, film, and games--the enjoyment of a game is least affected because of their participatory nature. Players are only getting more agency in games as technological and narrative ambitions increase. If someone tells me what happens a few hours into a game, I will still enjoy the hell out of that game.
Let’s take Mass Effect 2 for example. A few months before the game’s release, Bioware revealed that your ship from Mass Effect 1 blows up in the beginning. The internet freaked out, much like with this Arkham City spoiler. Now think back to when you first played Mass Effect 2. The sequence where the Normandy blows up was still awesome and, sure, it would have been more awesome if it was unexpected. Now, remember all the stuff you did after the Normandy exploded, that wasn’t “spoiled” for you: the choices you made, the side missions, the love interests, the cameos from the first game. Those all combined to make Mass Effect 2 the best game released that year.
Arkham City will be the same way. Consider all the other villains they have revealed, and how large the scope of the game is. There will be awesome twists, action scenes, and takedowns of lethal villains. Arkham Asylum was just as fun on my second and third playthroughs--even after knowing all the story beats--and I expect Arkham City to be the same.
" @FancySoapsMan said:Pretty much this. I feel like New Vegas is more of an RPG than fallout 3 was: better writing, more interesting characters/quests, and more opportunities to use all of the skills in the skill tree (rather than leveling up your guns and calling it good)." @CL60 said:"Same. The first town alone is better than any other town in Fallout 3. "
" No. I think it is far better then Fallout 3. "
I think I remember reading somewhere that there were going to be special unlockable characters for each platform (like soul calibur 2). The Minecraft dude seems like the best pc-exclusive candidate for super meat boy. I imagine his special power would be something like putting those temporary blocks down in a level so you could make bridges and stuff over obstacles.
" The idea of a universe where Duke Nukem Forever comes out before Gran Turismo 5 is strange and exciting to me. "couldn't have said it better myself!
I don't know I really like Jeff doing the new releases about 80% of the time. The only problem that I have is sometimes when I try to listen to the bombcast while falling asleep, his new release voices wake me up about an hour later.