JM12088

I think Skyler, Hank or walter Jr dies. One of those. It's the last part of his transformation. He started this for his family seeing one of them bite the bullet shows how far hes come and how lost hes got.

I'd also like to see some ties from Gus come back to bite him. The mexican cartel wouldn't touch Gus because of his links back in Chilean so it's hard to believe Walter could just kill him and not have someone come looking for him. Hoping it's not just him on the run from Hank.

What? Is this a joke?

@Yummylee said:

The Stereotypes.

Beat me to it. Add stupid in front of stereotypes.

I thought it was a real bad ending. Mostly because unless I'm misunderstanding it the end of darksiders 2 makes everything you did in darksiders 2 rather pointless. The whole thing was to save War who really didn't need saving going by the way darksiders 1 ended. And as that ending repeated itself at the end of DS2 what Death did for him was sweet F all. By the end of darksiders 2 you are in exactly the same situation you was in at the end of 1. You had zero effect on anything.

You cannot end on such an awesome cliffhanger and then make a follow up that makes literally zero progress. You know one of the great parts about darksiders 1 that set it apart from zelda? It's story.

Just made the game feel like a cash in. Lets make a sequal but lets drag this thing out to as many games as possible sort of thing. It's a good game, i enjoyed the journey and i suppose that's what counts but i cannot help but feel shafted slightly.

Also: Really weird how angry people on this site get over a poll. Jesus..just don't take part in it? Discussing the actual ending is better than voting in a poll.

There not deal breakers but if I'm on the edge and not sure if i want a game they can certainly swing my decision. If done right they can add a lot of replay value.

If you look at a game like the binding of isaac. It does achievements perfectly. They encourage multiple play throughs, theres a good mix of easy and hard and every single one unlocks new content.

You look at a game like halo and they just piss me off. They stick in stupid luck based multiplayer achievements. All that does is encourage people to dick around in a team based game rather than trying to play it properly. We have enough of that in multiplayer games as is without it being encouraged. Multiplayer based chievs should be banned.

So they just about manage to pay off there debts and they then think it's a good idea to go ahead and make an mmo based around there previous game that's already a failure financially?

Good luck with that. I wont be wasting my money.

I think hatred is the wrong word.

@Vorbis said:

It's not blocked on BT Internet, easily the biggest UK ISP.

People like to overreact as usual, it's just a few ISPs opting in.

BT asked for an extension. This is not opt in it's forced.

If anything it's encouraged me to pirate. I don't like being censored and i don't like my hand being held and told what i can and cannot see. If there going to start blocking websites because hollywood threw money at them I'll make it a point to head to piratebay anytime i fancy seeing a film.

The solution is to stop charging so much for films, release them at the same time as America and in an ideal world allow me access to brand new films via my TV/PC i don't always want to go to a cinema and pay £8 to sit in a crap seat with some fat pig behind me eating popcorn and kicking my seat.

Hes the greatest politician ever to exist. If he brushes his hair he loses his powers.