You don't have to. I am not saying no personal experience of the writer, just that it should be weighted appropriately. A game should be compared against other games in the same genre and that is where the personal opinion comes into it for me. If you review Forza 3, then it is reviewed with Forza 2, Gran Tursimo, Need For Speed and PGR3/4 in mind. You get your baseline from that and it should be noted how it compares against what has come before it. An actual score is more about what it does above "perfectly acceptable" or average. What it does better than average pushes that score up. Better still, no score at all as a number is really quite meaningless.I believe you may be right that we will not agree on this issue. I just don't believe that people can be purely objective on the level you seem to be referring to.
It is probably true to say that writers write purely to entertain, but in doing so, they cheapen the worth of what they write. It is also true that some people want to be entertained by the review. I still it can be done without ruining the integrity of the review. If we disagree that a review cannot be objective, then we will never agree. I am not going to take it personally. I have a lifetime of being analytical and critical of journalists in general. I don't feel the need to just settle for what they dish out. "
Log in to comment