Korolev

This user has not updated recently.

1354 0 20 26
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Korolev's forum posts

#1 Edited by Korolev (1354 posts) - 1 day, 18 hours ago

For me, it's not a big deal. I have a good internet connection, I have wifi.

BUT - it's not about the practicality. It's about the principle. There is no need for Microsoft to implement this. There is no functional reason why it HAS to connect every 24 hours. Your Xbox isn't like that guy from cranked who needs adrenaline to fuel his artificial heart (not a very good movie, by the way) - your Xbox isn't deriving some magic life force it needs to run from the internet. Microsoft could have designed it to NOT need a connection every 24 hours. In fact, it would have been easier to design it without the need for a connection every 24 hours.

The only reason why they would put this artificially contrived need is:

1) They want to see what you are playing on it, they want to see what you are watching on it, so they can market more stuff to you. This isn't a "horrible" thing, but there's no need for it to be compulsory!

2) They want to check to see if you've altered the firmware in anyway or played any pirated games on your machine.

If consumers don't respond negatively to this, I can bet you that in a year's time, a firmware update will be released requiring 2 connections a day, or maybe 4 connections a day, or maybe a connection every hour.... and then every minute.... and then every second. And if the Xbox One doesn't go down that road, I can bet you that all future consoles will.

And it won't negatively affect me. I have a great internet connection. I don't pirate games either!

But:

1) Not everyone has a great internet connection. What if you're living in Rural Australia? Or in any place in Australia that's not a metropolitan area? You're shit-out of luck mate. What if you live in Brazil and can't GET internet because you live in a run down area without the infrastructure? Hell, there are parts of America where the internet still hasn't reached.

#2 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 1 day, 18 hours ago

The entire story line seems to be a world in which America is on the backfoot after a devastating event. They really could have called it "Call of Duty: Underdogs". Because... well, they're the underdogs this time and there's a dog with them, and..... you know, Dogs of War and such. They could have also called it "Call of Duty: Dogs of War" for that matter.

But to be honest, "Underdogs" and "Dogs of War" are pretty cliche names. "Ghosts" is too, but perhaps a little less.

#3 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 3 days, 20 hours ago

Honestly I prefer Windows 7. I have windows 8 on my tablet/ultrabook hybrid, but I still don't use the metro interface. I don't like switching between two screens. Just give me the one screen and desktop shortcuts. I don't need Metro, I resent being forced to use it. Other than Metro, Windows 8 is quite stable, workable, reliable - - but so is Windows 7.

#4 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 7 days, 1 hour ago

As others have said, a company doesn't abandon a profit-making strategy without another one planned. It's not just "negative" reactions - people have had negative reactions to online passes since they came into existence. They're announcing that they're discontinuing online passes, hoping to gain some positive publicity, before unveiling their next "anti-used-game" policy.

#5 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 15 days, 8 hours ago

Good, I guess? Does it really change anything? I've got to think that the money they were getting from game licensing was pretty small.

#6 Edited by Korolev (1354 posts) - 19 days, 3 hours ago

Potentially very interesting technology. While they show it "somewhat" working in a regular room, you'd really need a flat wall to use it to its fullest, and preferably a white-wall so that the colours wouldn't interfere.

I can imagine a LOT of potential uses for this for presentations, for marketing, for TV and film viewing. As for games, there might be a few neat applications, but the tech is still a bit too immature for wide spread use in gaming. I can't imagine using this sort of technology myself right now, nor can I see it contributing much towards gaming at the moment.

But from a purely technology standpoint, it's pretty neat.

#7 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 19 days, 4 hours ago

Potentially very interesting technology. While they show it "somewhat" working in a regular room, you'd really need a flat wall to use it to its fullest, and preferably a white-wall so that the colours wouldn't interfere.

I can imagine a LOT of potential uses for this for presentations, for marketing, for TV and film viewing. As for games, there might be a few neat applications, but the tech is still a bit too immature for wide spread use in gaming. I can't imagine using this sort of technology myself right now, nor can I see it contributing much towards gaming at the moment.

But from a purely technology standpoint, it's pretty neat.

#8 Edited by Korolev (1354 posts) - 20 days, 19 hours ago

"Microsoft Media Box"

I can see them going for something really, really plain that will appeal to people who don't play games, but who might get it to watch TV shows or movies.

#9 Posted by Korolev (1354 posts) - 20 days, 19 hours ago

Nobody tips in Australia because our government actually mandates a livable minimum wage. I mean, come on America - I like a lot about you, with your hoover dam and your yellowstone and your NASA, but jeez - what's the point of a minimum wage if YOU CAN'T ACTUALLY LIVE ON IT!? And by live, I mean live at a level above crawling around in the trash for spare food or having to decide whether or not you can go to the doctor or not pay for heating for a few weeks.

#10 Edited by Korolev (1354 posts) - 21 days, 2 hours ago

The reason why is because the government is very scared and they are very poor. Transitioning to capitalism is tough, especially when you've been following a Soviet-Style Command economy for a long time. When the Russians did it, it was a disaster because they moved waaaaaaaaaaaay to fast. The Russians literally went from being a nation in which the butcher told the customer what was for sale and what to buy, to a nation in which the customer told the butcher what they wanted to buy, in about one year. As a result? The economy collapsed because virtually no one in Russia was equipped to deal with capitalism and trade.

The Chinese went slowly, and as a result, the government still stands. But China had some help - good US relations after Nixon, a very large population and they were willing to be pragmatic and adopt and experiment with different economy styles. North Korea has a dwindling population and they are not exactly pragmatic, and the leadership literally feels as if the rest of the world will eat them alive should they ever get the chance. They don't want to open up, because of their paranoia.

There is also the problem that the North has dug itself into a deep hole. There's a reason why the North Korean government has such oppressive laws - they know that the majority of the population hate them. They know that their people are starving and would overthrow them in a heartbeat if they ever felt they could. Transitioning to a capitalist economy requires opening up their borders and relaxing some of their more totalitarian laws - they feel that if they do this, they'll be killed in a heartbeat. They don't think they could successfully pull off what China did - open up slowly and gradually to allow trade but nothing else. They are scared that if they relax even a little bit, it'll set off a tidal wave of change that will result in them being destroyed. It is, afterall, what happened to the USSR.

The North Korean regime is also legendarily racist. They literally believe that the North Korean people are the "sacred" people of the world, who must find their own way. They're not even communist anymore - after the fall of the USSR, they changed their constitution to omit all mentions of Marx or Lenin or Communism. Instead, the North Korean regime preaches an ideology of "Juche" - "self reliance". This ideology holds that the North must be self-sufficient in every single way. Of course, their utter dependence on China makes a joke of their philosophy, but that's the official line. They don't want to be Capitalist because they see that as "foreign" and not "Korean", and so they believe it to be fundamentally flawed, because modern capitalism wasn't invented by a Korean person.

It's also because that's just the way things are and no one is brave enough/suicidal enough to risk asking for change. It's not just a matter of Kim Jung Un declaring "We're capitalist now, bitches!" Realize that the North Korean government actually has a number of powerful factions. When Kim Jong Il was still alive, he had to contend, for years, with his Uncle, his Aunt and other military leaders for control. Just because you're a dictator doesn't mean you get to stay dictator - people near you will try to overthrow you. This new guy, Kim Jong Un, is a young guy with barely any military experience whatsoever. The generals of the North Korean Army know this. They don't like his youth or his inexperience. It is entirely conceivable, that if he doesn't put on a good enough show of following in his father's footsteps that his Party may attempt to dispose of him.

The Current Leaders of the North have a good life. Their people are starving to death, but THEY aren't. They want to hold onto power, and change is always risky for those in power. Moving towards Capitalism is a big, big, big, big, big risk for them.

It's also probably a matter of stubborness and pride, as well as a mentality of "This is the way things are done!".

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC