I don't have a reading comprehension problem, but you have a problem skewing this argument into a very narrow and ignorant lens. In fact, you're just about as bad as it as MackJ is. I don't think "group 1" brought rape/murder threats upon themselves, nor do I think that it's even remotely acceptable on any level. I've already stated this many times, and you would know it if you uh...had better reading comprehension. So what group do I fit in then? Maybe a 4th group! Or maybe stop grouping individuals just because its convenient for you, and you can't handle the fact that MAYBE THE PEOPLE WHO DISAGREE WITH YOU AREN'T ALL EVIL JACKASSES WHO THREATEN TO RAPE AND MURDER...OR FEEL THAT THOSE ACTIONS ARE JUSTIFIED. Perhaps life isn't so binary and not everyone feels the need to fit in your neat little groups. Or I suppose you can continue to be dismissive of people because it's easier than realizing that not everyone agrees with you, and not all of those people are out of their god damn minds.
Also, what was the purpose of asking for proof when all you did was tack on a third, almost equally narrow option that was one big unreasonable stance? It's the typed equivalent of verbally quoting somebody in a dumb or obnoxious voice as to convince whoever you're relaying, that what they said is wrong. It's skews and the conversation in order to bias your own position instead of using reasoning to strengthen your argument. Another easy way out.
Well it's nice to be used as a benchmark for ignorance. Here's what I was saying for those who couldn't understand it: Those are the two groups of people who are fighting each other on twitter. THOSE ARE NOT THE ONLY TWO TYPES OF PEOPLE THAT EXIST. I can say there are two sides in something and not be making a generalized statement about the entire human race. If you are not in one of those two groups then you are not one of the people I was talking about.