Something went wrong. Try again later

me3639

This user has not updated recently.

2006 0 1 17
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

me3639's forum posts

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

#1  Edited By me3639

Ive been preaching this forever. However, it may be too little, too late and until i see halo(including the new one) and gears all released on PC its just more filler.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

"Fuck you, what a piece of shit" "This game sucks" "Fuckin EA". Oh, sorry hope you all find jobs soon. Now where did i put that most excellent 100th Mario game.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

#3  Edited By me3639

2 games that come to mind for me are at least breathing in a sense they may see a release? Who knows but i want them both.

1. Van Buren- The code name for Fallout 3 before Interplay sold the rights to Bethesda. Some super fans of course are resurrecting the game and are receiving both input and help from the original developers. Heres a small interview and screenshots from the upcoming game.

Loading Video...

2. Nuclear Union was announced in 2012 but due to war in the region a lot of the developers are just trying to survive. Its Metro, Fallout and Stalker and anything like that ill follow.

Loading Video...

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

@ames: To be even more crazy we just went through what 7-8 years where vampires are "It". You had true Blood(Hbo), Twilight(movies), Underworld(movies) and now the originals(WB?) I cant believe there was never another Vampire RPG. How is that possible? seems to me a world that would be easy to build. Not easy to make, but the concepts and ideas are there to expand.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

Pretty much anything reviewed over the last 10 years. If it got a 6 (out of 10) its probably pretty good. Pussy, i mean expert reviewer, difficulty seems to skew a lot of results.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

First rule of Nintendo, you dont say anything bad about Nintendo. Second rule, see the first rule.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

Like any game ill wait til its $20. I think what people tend to foget, as most people are not very smart, is this has been in develpment for 3-4 years. That means a lot of its systems are going to be very recognizeable. The one dissapointing aspect i have heard was during a stealth mission there is no option. You either do it right, or restart. I think the game will get slammed by "reviewers" if it reliant on qte's and such, but what do they know. It looks fantastic, and love the setting so its all good from a players perspective.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

@nodima said:

Finished games, please. Every early access Steam game looks and sounds the same to me, or there's just not enough there to be playing it for 30 minutes.

Ill go the other route, so does everything released by Nintendo or other AAA developer.

Avatar image for me3639
me3639

2006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

17

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 4

Ill go with Red Dead but by a narrow margin over Sleeping Dogs. Both carried an interesting story from start to finish, both had great characters, and both were just plain fun and hard to stop playing.

Also not counting mass effect because its not really open world.