Something went wrong. Try again later

MmaFanQc

This user has not updated recently.

103 0 3 2
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

MmaFanQc's forum posts

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1  Edited By MmaFanQc

two nubs instead of proper joystick? how is this can even be called "hardcore"?

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me said:

@Dan_CiTi: As I posted many times Superbot the battle royale developer was playing a Wii. Why would a Sony developer have a Wii if they are not trying to completely ripoff Nintendo.

because they are real gamers, real games will own all the consoles, something you didnt understood about that simple concept of being free to do what you want?

@robot4me said:

@outerabiz: Are all of you people are butthurt that I said Sony completely ripped off Nintendo this one time. It's o.k. to make that style of game but a complete ripoff is not o.k.

The developers of this ripoff are Superbot and they just seem to be playing a Wii. I wonder what the next Nintendo title they will ripoff for Sony.

its not about us being "butthurt", its about you going ape shit and making a fool of yourself trying to defend the undefendable.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me said:

@MmaFanQc: As I teach my children stealing isn't O.K., this kind of copying should be frowned upon by gamers. I guess you love sony too much to see lately they have no originality. I will not reply anymore because this is useless and boring. Have a nice day.

indeed stealing isnt ok, but did nintendo patented the brawl genre? nope.

whats next? street fighter games "stealed" the 2d fighting game genre from Heavyweight Champ(1976) and this kind of copying should be frowned upon by gamers?, so i guess Street Fighter shouldnt have the right to exist if we follow you dumb and pathetic ideology?

have a nice day, and stop to be so ridiculously irrational(..at least do it for your child)

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me: weve seen ton of original games coming out from sony's internal development teams/first/second/third party or directly published by sony.

Warhawk/Starhawk, Wild Arms, Parappa the rapper, Jeanne Darc, Jet Moto, Jumping Flash, Legend of Dragoon, Rally Cross, Heavenly Sword, G-Police, Everquest, Destruction Derby, Blasto, Cool Boarders Spyro, Socom, Gravity Daze, Vib-Ribbon, Patapon, Sorcery, Escape Plan, SuperStardust, Dead Nation, Dark Mist, Folklore, Pursuit Force, Flower, Journey and LittleBigPlanet, Ico, Shadow of the Colossus, Demon's Souls, Ape Escape, Loccoroco, Siren, Last Guardian, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo, Jack and Daxter, Ratchet and Clanks, Syphon Filter, Resistance, Infamous, Sly Cooper, Medievil, Wipeout, Motorstorm and Twisted Metal just to name a few, so to me, the "sony always copy" is kinda ridiculous to swallow. i wont deny that MANY games get inspired by others, but simply resuming to "blah blah rip off this rip off that blahhh" is just too simplistic and narrow minded.

like i previously said, after all, arent ALL the first person shooters directly inspired/ripped off Wolfenstein3d? and Mario Bros on NES perfected the 2d plateformer..so should we not allow other 2d plateformers to be directly inspired by it?

Okay, yes, we should strive for originality, but innovation and quality are not automatically synonymous. good idea may be executed poorly and if someone is going to try something else with that idea, why shouldn't they? Maybe this game will bring something new. Maybe it won't. Maybe it'll be an enjoyable experience, maybe even BETTER... and is that really so bad?

At first glance it does look like a SSB rip-off, but so what? First off we don't know every detail about the game yet. There could a lot of things that isn't present in SSB that is in this game.

And even if it is a SSB rip off, so what? SSB is a good game and fans have been asking for a game like SSB that featured Sony characters for a long time. Why is it all of a sudden wrong? If anything people shouldn't be blaming Sony, but should be blaming fans for asking for it. You wanted a SSB game that featured Sony characters, you got it, if you don't like it then that's why you should be careful for what you wish for.

People should just be excited, wait for more gameplay and roster details to come out.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me:

i also own a wii and a 3ds, but im a "sony drone", so whats your point?

i also have a good friend who work at eidos montreal who worked on DeusEx, the game isnt on a nintendo console....but yet they also have ALL the consoles in the workplace.

1 word: GAMER.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6  Edited By MmaFanQc

@hughesman:

indeed, pretty sad to see some peoples sptiting hate on a god damn console brand.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me: thx for proving my point, your lack of arguments is blatant.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8  Edited By MmaFanQc

@robot4me said:

@MmaFanQc: Just admit it you like getting screwed over by Sony. As for me I have loyalties to no video game company. anyone can see Sony were doing a great job until the ps3 came out and everything went horribly wrong. Sony got hacked, copied a lot of other companies features and games, then lost 6.4 billion dollars.

Just admit it you are so butthurted and just admit you have zero arguments against my last post, you simply keep repeating your same old recycled rancid hot air and have to make yourself feel more secure by calling peoples "sony defence force" or "sony drone" only because you totally lack of arguments against something you doesnt agree and doesnt know how to deal with.

btw, about the 6.4 billion dollars lost, you are aware that sony dont only have the playstation to deal with, they have a shit ton of electronic devices/tvs, with the relatively bad economy, last year tsunami damaging some of their factories and 3dtvs not selling its more than only about the playstation brand, but anyway you proven me many time that you are irrational so i wont expect you to even understand.

So until you can look at my last post and find arguments against what i said, rage moar kido.

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9  Edited By MmaFanQc

@lockwoodx said:

Lack of Ape Escape characters makes this an utter failure.

did you even noticed that what we saw was only a SNEAK PEAK of 6 characters?

Avatar image for mmafanqc
MmaFanQc

103

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

2

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10  Edited By MmaFanQc

@Hailinel said:

@spartanlolz92 said:

even if it doesnt get 9.0 it will still be infinitely better than brawl

two words "friend codes" -__-

A game doesn't need good online play to be a good game. It just needs good online play to be a good game with good online play. It's not particularly great code aside, Brawl is a fun game. Sony might be able to put together a better online component (though online quality is never a sure thing until launch), but if the gameplay isn't there to back it up, then having online that's worth a damn won't actually be worth a damn.

pretty much what i was about to say, that said i really hate the silly friend codes system of nintendo, but yet i had a lot of fun online on my 3ds with MK7, so it prove your point.