Something went wrong. Try again later

oGShAdY

This user has not updated recently.

361 1382 54 43
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

oGShAdY's forum posts

Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#1  Edited By oGShAdY
Sentry said:
"?_?

Did I get extra points for more links? No problem that you cleaned it out, you could have asked me to do so, but if I gained extra points for these extra links you can remove those points, just to prove to you that I didn't add more links just to get points.

And it wasn't a 'joke', sorry if it comes of as one. Again, if links got me extra points you can remove those extra points that I got from it, no problem.
"
Don't sweat it man. You didn't know.
Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By oGShAdY

Thanks for the clarification. I do see your intention now. Thanks again for the effort.

Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#3  Edited By oGShAdY
Sentry said:
"I get the feeling that this is some kind of sick competition or something, I didn't delete your list you know, I left there if people want a more IN-DEPTH detailed view on the MP features.
"
Well, I appreciate that, I guess. No, I don't intend for any form of competitive spirit here at all. I just wish that you would have refrained from making overly redundant links in the game description. Your information is just a rationalized example of the multiplayer details. They are not a "more IN-DEPTH" representation of information. I do, however, see a lot of cross over in our information. This can be taken many ways, but it can come off as a lack of awareness of other's content when posting. As I have said before, I appreciate your contributions anyway. Thanks for adding to this page and I hope we can work together to keep it up-to-date and stock full of quality information.
Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By oGShAdY

Nevermind. Keep up the good work.

Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By oGShAdY

I added only official information without extrapolation. I don't wish the obscure the page with repeated and unnecessary links.

Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By oGShAdY
Sentry said:
"Equilibria said:
"Sentry said:
"Trust me, the main part of Killzone 2 won't even be the SP, even though its good and nice, with co-op and all, the MP will be a huge hit"
I don’t think that co-op is in the game from day one of release. However GG might add online co-op, split screen co-op? vehicles or new multiplayer maps as downloadable content. "

Online co-op, yes, split screen? No.

And people bitching; we have only seen the 2 levels so far, the second one, and one later in the game. NOTHING to judge. Plus its always looking better and getting better, so no worries.
"
Are you sure about online co-op play? I haven't heard any official word on this as of yet. And I can vouch for your statement that only two levels have been shown. In the order of the game they are levels 2 and 3. Also, expect the color palette to really broaden with future game play footage releases.
Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#7  Edited By oGShAdY

Thumbs Down


I would be inclined to agree with you. I think that Crowd moderation of Wiki information could be a horrible feature to add to Giant Bomb. It would stream line the process too much and make it so that low quality submissions could easily appear all around the site. I hope that it does not happen and I think that it would be the feature to really destroy the faith that many of the more driven posters have.

I personally don't think I would bother to post information anymore considering that I spend a long time finding certified information, while checking sources and performing multiple edits. If the Giant Bomb staff want this site to grow in a positive direction they will scrap the idea of doing crowd moderation.

I am willing to change my opinion however. The staff could implement a system that I myself can't foresee that would avoid any possible exploits or corruption of Giant Bomb.
Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By oGShAdY
mezzanine said:
"Even though I never played online, I must admit that the original Killzone was a pretty good game. Yes it did have its share of bugs and glitches, but overall it was a great game with a lot of potential to be a huge and successful series. I think a big problem is that a lot of people played Killzone expecting an FPS revolution, because of all the media hype. I went in expecting a solid game and that's what I got. So for anyone who hasn't played the original, I say pick it up used and cheap if you can.
"
I couldn't have said that any better. I guess someone else out there had the same approach to the game I had.
Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By oGShAdY

I noticed a sizable addition the the multiplayer section of the Killzone 2 page. Now, I was wondering what you all thought of the information. Likes, dislikes and suggestions.

Personally, I think I'll be combining the primary Scout badge with the secondary Saboteur for an invisible bomb setting time!

Avatar image for ogshady
oGShAdY

361

Forum Posts

1382

Wiki Points

43

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By oGShAdY
Snipes424 said:
"Anyone who is not legally blind can see that Killzone 2 is the best looking game on a console so far.  So in a "best graphics award" for E3, either Killzone 2 or Crysis would win right?  Because Crysis has the best graphics on the PC and Killzone 2 has the best graphics on the console.... not according to IGN, they give it to Gears of War 2....................................................................  Don't get me wrong, Gears of War 2 looks great, but it is not in the same ballpark as Killzone 2.  If you think this is a joke here is the link

http://games.ign.com/articles/893/893833p4.html

I really like IGN but I think their credability went straight downhill...  Is it just ignorance?  Or does everyone over there hate the PS3 that much other then the Playstation channel?
"
To be completely on topic, only two of Killzone 2's levels have been shown to the press. The color pallet in Killzone 2 is anything but bland if you have actually seen demoed footage and that's just from two levels. We have yet to see anything other than that from Guerrilla yet. http://www.gamersyde.com/stream_8081_en.html Check out that video to get what I mean.