omghisam's forum posts

#1 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -

As the man behind the man, I expect special treatment. At least three youtube spam threads or "I heard Brad's leaving!" comments a month.

#2 Edited by omghisam (321 posts) -

Her argument wasn't GB is sexist for not liking TR it's that there are few women in the room during goty discussions.minority opinions aren't considered, so it's a systemic problem not particular to just Jeff and the gang. Maybe allow for nuisance in other peoples arguments without jumping to grab your pitchforks to defend vidyagames.

Also this isn't clickbait because it's a medium article without ads. At worst it's just an opinion piece you may not agree with.

#3 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -

That's a lame flamebaity of summarizing her article.

#4 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -

I completely forgot about that whole period where Square was making FFVII sequel/prequels tricking you into thinking they were building up to FFVII-2 or a HD remake without ever doing it. You just sold a copy of Crisis Core, forward this as an invoice to Square Enix for your cut of the $15 PSP games cost now a days.

#5 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -
@k9 said:

I was pretty sure AJ was dropping the title to Natalya at the ppv because of Total Divas. But with this new Meltzer info of AJ going crazy at Tribute to the troops show I now expect the match to be turned into a 20 second burial job.

Yikes I had to google around to find the story you're referring to. It's just as well. Nattie has been there forever and had to put up with so many terrible storylines, she should get another run with the title.

#6 Edited by omghisam (321 posts) -

@f1reflygr7 said:

@hailinel said:

It's lovely that you're trying to rail against her in this thread, and the moment someone asks what it is she's done to incite the uproar, you refuse to speak up on it.

You shouldn't argue about something you don't understand.

However in this instance I'll give you the benefit of the doubt as the coverage of this situation has hardly been reliable.

Here have a funny.

Loading Video...

It focuses a bit too much on the inconsequential bits in an attempt to inject some "humor" for my taste, but just go about 14 minutes in and you'll get the gist of it. I'd post a better video, but there isn't one.

I'd explain it all, but my time here is short and it'd take a good half an hour to adequately explain. Perhaps when I have more time available.

I totally trust the guy who does nothing but make videos about Anita Sarkeesian, Patricia Hernandez, Susan Wilson, and "white knights" tell me it isn't about gender.

#7 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -

I'm against Rorie's pro-puppy CHOMPING agenda. He should be fired because I'm raging against him right now. It's proof he can't DEAL with the community.

#8 Edited by omghisam (321 posts) -

I find it amusing that people are complaining about nepotism in the forum of a web site where half the staff got their job because they were high school friends with Jeff.

#9 Posted by omghisam (321 posts) -
@alexw00d said:

@mb said:

@alexw00d said:

@twolines said:

The hell does Q stand for? And why are they all lumped together? That's dumb. You know what's not dumb? The ballad of Gay Tony. It's a damn fine game/expansion.

I think Q refers to Queer, which is fucking ridiculous considering the word queer means weird/strange/odd. The fact that people in this thread are happy to use that term is fucked up.

I hate to break this to you, but the term queer is very commonly used as a self-descriptive term by quite a few different orientations. If you don't believe me, take a look at the Craigslist personals in San Francisco.

And black people commonly refer to themselves and their friends with the N-word, but that doesn't mean I can use it too does it?

Queer isn't a dirty word...