PandaBear

This user has not updated recently.

612 237 7 7
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

PandaBear's forum posts

#1 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 1 year, 11 months ago
@Lind_L_Taylor said:
Fuck this.  I want an Aliens game where I can sell out my squad mates for a fucking percentage.  Also, I would rather have seen Obsidian's Aliens RPG built instead of another goddam shooter.  It'll probably be a COD/MW clone, but instead of fuckin' zombies, you got fuckin' Aliens(c).
Everything about this, especially the percentage part, is pure win haha
#2 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 1 year, 11 months ago
@buckybit said:
@Alraiis:  
  
(maybe I am going to far here, but I like to explain something. I hope, it's interesting for someone on GB) 

I get the intention using (pop)music for game trailers.  
I get the necessity for using music. 
 
My very personal beef is: I associate the pop-songs already with 'something'. 
 
We are in reverse Psychology territory here:  
 
Using music that is 'cool' - attaching it to a movie-trailer, gameplay etc - sends the message: "The music is cool = our game/film is AS cool! We are even! This (our stuff) is exciting!"  
 
That's marketing psychology beyond just "having music" in a trailer. There is an intention behind it, working. Intrusive. Infectious. For someone like me, even close to offensive.  
 
The Gears of War + Adam Lambert's "Mad World" trailer works on the other hand. It is 'funny' for some, but more important than that, it captures the emotional intention of the song! It stays true to the material. That's why it 'worked'.
 
Portishead "Machine Gun" mixed with blurry promises of 'something' only leaves the song 'doing the work'. The game footage tells me nothing - the song speaks of a dark relationship, emotional dispair, very personal fears.  
 
There is no room for a FPS... unless you give me something narrative, that carries a complementary message. Like a film negative to a positive.
 
(Again- sorry for going on about this. But hey, I get it. I have to swallow these things and live with them. Grumpy old man, that I am, haha. :)
The Gears of War + Adam Lambert's "Mad World" ??? Are you crazy? it was the Gary Jules version, an (awesome) cover of the (excellent) Tears for Fears song. Adam Lambert... sheesh
 
The Gears of War trailer was BULLSHIT too. It made out like that game had some kind of emotional story. The shit about your wife was pathetic, in fact 99% of Gears story is garbage. I really like those games, but they put very little effort into making it coherent.  
 
In THAT instance a song was used to give the illusion that that game had a story when it had none. If anything it was taking a good songs credibility to give their own game some, when it had none. Yeah it won awards, but Shakespeare in Love won Best Picture at the Academy Awards too.
 
This is not a TRAILER, it's a TEASER. It's flavour. It's showing you the game's themes are tone, not it's gameplay. In a short space of time I understood so much about that world - the gas masks, the monsters, the small spaces. You CANNOT comment on Metro Last Light's story based on THIS. 
 
It sounds more like your a Portishead fan who has a bee in their bonnet.
#3 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 22 days ago
Part of Giant Bomb's problem is the American bias. The NES may have been a smash is the US, and the Master System a relative failure, but outside of the US (you know, the rest of the world) it was a success. Brazil, Japan, Australia and the UK loved it. 

Anyway, lumping these two games in together because they have the same name and are both from the 90s is stupid. Why not add Sonic The Hedgehog for the Xbox 360 and PS3 here too by that logic. 

These are two separate games - the Master System version is NOT a port, it was made FROM SCRATCH. If this site is about recording history then let it show these are different games. FYI, I made separate wiki for the Master System version, but it was rejected, so I did try.
#4 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 22 days ago
@Molenator85 said:
" @PandaBear said:
" @elko84 said:
" @TooWalrus said:
" @MrKlorox said:
" @I_smell said:
" @Bib said:
" I like you, Patrick, but: This is a Kotaku article. "
EXACTLY what I was thinkin! "
You guys aren't the only ones. "
And as someone who doesn't visit Kotaku on a regular basis, I'd like to be informed whenever something totally rad like this rolls around- especially on slow news days. Thanks, Klepek. "
You forget, once one website posts news that's its I guess.  You can only read about it at that one place.  How dare you receive that same news anywhere else!  I wonder how these people live their lives when they hear news on CNN but then see the same news on Fox.  It must blow their mind!! "
You're totally missing the point. It's not that the story is on both Kotaku and Giant Bomb, it's that it's a Kotaku quality story. If Kotaku broke a SERIOUS news story I'd expect it here too, but not fluff stories like this.

Kotaku is basically the Entertainment Tonight of video game news - sensationalised crap, unsubstantiated stories and Brian Ashcraft and co. fawning over Japanese school girls. Leave this kind of "Look it's a cake that looks like Gordon Freeman!!!" stuff to lame blogs like Destructoid (you know, that site that Jim Sterling killed).

We we're promised a NEWS guy, and instead we got another video game blogger. Sigh.
"
Another video game bloggger? Really? Patrick's articles so far have been of a quality that is not often seen (by me at least) on most video game websites. His articles on the Activision memos were fairly fascinating reads that I enjoyed immensely. Even if you do believe that this exact posting is insubstantial, that does not automatically expunge the rest of his work thus far on the site. "
Ok yeah, that's fair enough. I do agree that the Activision memos was great and maybe I overreacted a bit. But I don't want this website going down the "It's a slow news day, post something about Metroid underwear" path. I like Patrick, but I don't want Giant Bomb to become just another video game culture blog is all.
#5 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 22 days ago
@sofacitysweetheart said:
" @Laketown said:
" @tourgen said:

" @sofacitysweetheart said:

" Not to sound like a bossy boots, but people really shouldn't buy these until they fix the game.
Buying it now is sending a message that it's okay for them to pump out these broken games. So if you buy it now, and they release a New Vegas 2 game later this year which is just as broken as before, it'll be your own fault.
"
good advice.I've held off so far.  With so many games coming this year I'll just wait until they fix it and bundle it all up on a single disk for me. "
it's been fixed for a while on PC at least, so... waiting for all the DLC is fine but saying that it's broken is just wrong;  and I would love a new vegas 2 "
Here's the thing. That game shouldn't have been released in the state it was in anyway. If by "fixed" you mean a combination of developer patches, user mods and wiki guides telling you which quests will corrupt your save... that's not really fixed.

I bought the Fallout 3 GOTY edition a few months after it was released and never once encountered a real problem with the game. How did they manage to take the same game and not only counteract all of the work from those patches, but also create new problems they felt didn't have to be fixed for release? I know this is old news, but boo them.
"
If you miss out on this game because of the bugs I promise you that you're missing out on an awesome game. BUT I won't make excuses or say that's it's fixed, because I'm up-to-date with my patches and it's a lot better, but not perfect. If anyone has waited this long I'd just wait for the inevitable Game of the Year edition... it'll be the best and least buggy version for sure.
#6 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 22 days ago
@elko84 said:
" @TooWalrus said:
" @MrKlorox said:
" @I_smell said:
" @Bib said:
" I like you, Patrick, but: This is a Kotaku article. "
EXACTLY what I was thinkin! "
You guys aren't the only ones. "
And as someone who doesn't visit Kotaku on a regular basis, I'd like to be informed whenever something totally rad like this rolls around- especially on slow news days. Thanks, Klepek. "
You forget, once one website posts news that's its I guess.  You can only read about it at that one place.  How dare you receive that same news anywhere else!  I wonder how these people live their lives when they hear news on CNN but then see the same news on Fox.  It must blow their mind!! "
You're totally missing the point. It's not that the story is on both Kotaku and Giant Bomb, it's that it's a Kotaku quality story. If Kotaku broke a SERIOUS news story I'd expect it here too, but not fluff stories like this.

Kotaku is basically the Entertainment Tonight of video game news - sensationalised crap, unsubstantiated stories and Brian Ashcraft and co. fawning over Japanese school girls. Leave this kind of "Look it's a cake that looks like Gordon Freeman!!!" stuff to lame blogs like Destructoid (you know, that site that Jim Sterling killed).

We we're promised a NEWS guy, and instead we got another video game blogger. Sigh.
#7 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 1 month ago

I love this idea that people say "if you don't like him ignore him" ... Fuck that! Jim Sterling is the reason I stopped reading Destructoid ... his bullshit headlines that lead to stories about nothing and his sheer arrogance is awful and made me abandon a site I used to like. I think people have a right to stand up and say he sucks. How many of us complained about that stupid Leigh Alexander when she ruined the Bombcast? You have the right to say what's shit.


By that "ignore it" logic you could say if you don't like Game X, don't buy it or talk about it or do a review on it. If you don't like Musician X don't listen to them and don't express your opinion on them. If somebody chooses to be in the public eye you have a right to say they're awesome or they suck or you don't care.

Also this idea that "any publicity is good publicity" or that "he wants you to talk about him" is bullshit. I boycott anything he's involved with. If enough people did that sites that rely on page views would start to see a downward trend.

Lastly I chose to beat him with a sock full of coins.
#8 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 2 years, 10 months ago

You LIKED Wolfenstien... no offence duder but you'll like anything if you liked that train wreck. Try Superman 64 as well.

#9 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago

It's an odd additon... but the crunchy texture adds a lot to a burger.... so yeah, you could say i'm a big fan

#10 Posted by PandaBear (612 posts) - 4 years, 9 months ago
Rowr said:
"PandaBear said:
"

Rowr said:

"not sure. Cant remember very well it was like 6 or 7 years ago.

All i remember was that i got a whopper and it tasted very non distinct. Like a regular boring hamburger.
I came away not very impressed anyway.
"


Wow okay.... that's a bold statement because I think the Whopper is pretty good... not great but better than most.... thanks Rowr!

"
No i mean i was unimpressed with the burger king whopper, or its equivalent, I cant even remember if it was called a whopper.

sorry i wasnt clear.

The Hungry Jacks ones are Bloody Awesome.
"

Nah it's my fault... I get what you're saying... cheers!

And who wants a Burger King? Hungry Jacks sounds so.... democratic. None of this monarcy bullshit.

Use your keyboard!

  • ESC