Pepsiman
Valkyria Chronicles going for $20 on GameStop's site is a very tempting proposition....
followed by
121

Added by Pepsiman on June 4, 2009

This E3 has been morbidly entertaining because the online rage seems to be directed at the oddest places. To commemorate this spectacle, I have seen fit to generate two fake complaint letters using the wonders of this site. What are they addressed to? You'll find out shortly. I think they're still generally reflective of the (heaps of) rationality on display on the Internets lately. Enjoy. :)

Letter number one!

I just want a little editorial balance here. I guess I should start by saying that I decidedly hope you're not being misled by the "new Left 4 Dead 2". Only its methods and tactics have changed. Left 4 Dead 2's goal is still the same: to waste taxpayers' money. That's why I'm telling you that an organization that wants to get ahead should try to understand the long-range consequences of its actions. Left 4 Dead 2 has never had that faculty. It always does what it wants to do at the moment and figures it'll be able to lie itself out of any problems that arise.

Left 4 Dead 2's ability to reason from premise to conclusion is nearly non-existent. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. We must halt the destructive process that is carrying our civilization toward extinction. If we don't, future generations will not know freedom. Instead, they will know fear; they will know sadness; they will know injustice, poverty, and grinding despair. Most of all, they will realize, albeit far too late, that if you can make any sense out Left 4 Dead 2's confused, dishonest magic-bullet explanations then you must have gotten higher marks in school than I did. We should lend a helping hand. (Goodness knows, our elected officials aren't going to.)

Of perhaps even more concern is that Left 4 Dead 2's maudlin preoccupation with philistinism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as "counterestablishment", would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to destroy our country from within. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that Left 4 Dead 2's goal is to excoriate attempts to bring questions of factionalism into the (essentially apolitical) realm of pedagogy in language and writing. This is abject lexiphanicism! As we all know, Left 4 Dead 2 is living in cloud-cuckoo-land. Does Left 4 Dead 2 honestly expect us to believe that all major world powers are controlled by a covert group of "insiders"? If I'm not horribly mistaken, there's a painfully simple answer. It regards the way that if it sincerely believes that it is a paragon of morality and wisdom then it must be smoking something illegal. Some reputed—as opposed to reputable—members of Left 4 Dead 2's lynch mob quite adamantly think that a totalitarian dictatorship is the best form of government we could possibly have. I find it rather astonishing that anyone could profess such a thing but then again, Left 4 Dead 2 thinks it would be a great idea to turn the trickle of mysticism into a tidal wave. Even if we overlook the logistical impossibilities of such an idea, the underlying premise is still flawed. Unfortunately, I can already see the response to this letter. Someone, possibly Left 4 Dead 2 itself or one of its flunkies, will write a revolting piece about how utterly contumacious I am. If that's the case, then so be it. What I just wrote sorely needed to be written.

And now for letter two!

I have facts for those who think and arguments for those who reason. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Ms. Leigh Alexander, not because I harbor any ill-will towards her but because she uses obscure words like "contemporaneousness" and "disadvantageousness" to conceal her agenda to fill our children's minds with infernal and debasing superstitions. I find that having to process phrases with long words like those makes me feel hoodwinked, inferior, definitely frustrated, and angry. That's why I strive for utmost clarity whenever I explain to others that from secret-handshake societies meeting at "the usual place" to back-door admissions committees, Ms. Alexander's adulators have always found a way to create a Ms. Alexander-centric society in which insane exponents of masochism dictate the populace's values and myths, its traditions and archetypes.

I have no idea why Ms. Alexander makes such a big fuss over pauperism. There are far more pressing issues that present themselves and that should be discussed, debated, and solved—issues such as war, famine, poverty, and homelessness. There is also the lesser issue that I've repeatedly pointed out to Ms. Alexander that she should judge not lest she be judged. That apparently didn't register with her, though. Oh, well; I guess if five years ago I had described a person like Ms. Alexander to you and told you that in five years she'd blend together conformism and poststructuralism in a train wreck of monumental proportions, you'd have thought me effete. You'd have laughed at me and told me it couldn't happen. So it is useful now to note that, first, it has happened and, second, to try to understand how it happened and how she takes things out of context, twists them around, and then neglects to provide decent referencing so the reader can check up on her. Ms. Alexander also ignores all of the evidence that doesn't support (or in many cases directly contradicts) her position.

Ms. Alexander will truly damage the debate about this issue in that we will have to spend lots of time correcting misunderstandings that are directly attributable to her ebullitions. Each rung on the ladder of scapegoatism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Ms. Alexander to stir up one part of the population against another. That is the standard process by which delirious sad sacks make us less united, less moral, less sensitive, less engaged, and more perversely grotesque. Might I suggest that she search for a hobby? It seems Ms. Alexander has entirely too much time on her hands, given how often she tries to prevent me from sleeping soundly at night. Because I unfortunately lack the psychic powers that enable Ms. Alexander to "know" matters for which there is no reliable evidence, I cannot forecast when she will next try to shout obscenities at passers-by. But I can indisputably say that Ms. Alexander has a strategy. Her strategy is to render unspeakable and unthinkable whole categories of beliefs about power. Wherever you encounter that strategy, you are dealing with Ms. Alexander. And there you have it. Ms. Leigh Alexander's exegeses are unpatriotic, poisonous to young minds, and disrespectful to Western values and achievements.

....

And there you have it. Ms. Leigh Alexander is out to destabilize society as we know it.