Ping5000's forum posts

#1 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

The ones that balance the game and make it way more fun than it is now.

Sorry for being so vague. Pretend I reconfigured that statement into a question.
#2 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

What's with some of these responses?

"Pretty good deal."
"Not bad."

$40 for a functional 360? That's goddamn INSANE. Absurd. Unreal. Other colorful adjectives.
#3 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

So, I guess you all know that I love Prince of Persia. Oh, wait, you don't. I haven't posted it here yet. I'll get to it after this. Anyway, it's got visuals that trigger primal gawkery, ridiculous strings of platforming, a great combat system and a heartfelt story to give it all some wonderful context. With sequels often being derided by practically everyone (BUT MAFIA II LOOKS SO AWESOME!@@!!), this latest sequel feels nothing like a sequel. It feels new, while keeping the same gameplay foundations that I have come to know and love about the series. Ubisoft simply started over.

Companies love sequels. They love the brand recognition, they love the assurance that their sequel will sell well. Money is awesome. And they often get a lot of flak for pumping out a new entry every few years. It's usually not because a sequel is an inherently bad thing. I mean, we all wanted Half-Life 2. I'm pretty sure we all wanted Dreamfall. And I know we all want Mafia II. It's that sequels can feel unneccessary and forced. Just look at Fallout 3. You can send me all the hate mail you want. I will read them. Probably.

So, Ubisoft avoided this by simply keeping the franchise name and tossed everything they set up and developed with their trilogy into the bin. Prince of Persia isn't a spin-off. It's a total reboot and that's the kind of sequel anyone can love. It's familiar, but oh so different. Just like how Batman Begins revitalized the franchise and made Batman relevant again, except Ubisoft rebooted just because they thought this new Prince of Persia was so damn awesome.


1. Just start over. Like what Ubisoft did. Or what Square-Enix does with every Final Fantasy, but since only Final Fantasy 3/6 is the only Final Fantasy worth playing, their games don't really strengthen my point. Again, send the hate mail. I might read them. My hobbies include attracting attention.

2. Wait two infinities before releasing a sequel. Nostalgia will gnaw at us and taunt us, telling us that we will have no new memories of Mafia, because a sequel will never materialize. And then Mafia II appears out of the woodwork after 6 years. Seriously, I can't believe Mafia II is a real game that was really announced. Finally.

3. They should feel meaningful and relevant. Episode Three is relevant. The F.E.A.R. expansions were kind of pointless. The exhumation of the Fallout franchise is unneccessary.

Cliffs, if you really want them: Sequels can be cool.

#4 Edited by Ping5000 (449 posts) -


I meant to give Dead Space two stars, but I just made a human error. Is there a way to edit reviews after posting them? I haven't figured it out.

Whatever, I like getting attention. It makes me feel good. Please, continue to stare.
#5 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

Tina Fey. I want her.

#6 Edited by Ping5000 (449 posts) -


Butcher Bay was awesome, but this trailer doesn't set my crotch on fire.

#7 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

Only Amusement Vision can make F-Zero games now. Anyone else will muck it up.

#8 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

It should've been free.

#9 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

I don't really see what's so wrong about this. Eidos wants to make more money. Is that so wrong? Just let them go on with their business. It's not like your purchase depends on Metacritic scores, right?

#10 Posted by Ping5000 (449 posts) -

I'm better than all of you physically, mentally, charismatically and metaphysically.

I can also be a gigantic douche.