@mezza: I went back and listened to Vinny's argument on why he thought Assassin's Creed: Origin was his most disappointing game of the year. I think that it was the pinnacle of the deliberations this year. He made fantastic points why a series he invested so much time in felt so different to what he expected. Alex and Ben ultimately pushed back stating the game had the opposite effect. Abby dismissed his entry to the category saying that it may his most disappointing game of the year, but not the website's.
And this isn't just to gang up on Abby. She did provide a long list of reasons why Mario Kart 8 deserved 2017's old game of the year. Yes, she ran through those reasons like a fanatic, but she made valid points that everyone agreed. It's just unfortunately to hear how she celebrated by saying "Yay, I won" when it isn't that kind of competition.
Brad dismissed Horizon because it felt empty and because of cultural appropriation. Aside from the cultural part of the game, Brad dismissed Batman: Arkham City the same way. After beating Arkham City, he said that the game deserved an honorable mention in his own top ten list. If Brad played through Horizon, he would have saw why the game developers made the decision to have diversity in one society. It may not have cracked the list, but to simply push it aside because he didn't get to a crucial part of the game is a shame.
I honestly feel like 2017 was a fantastic year for video games. However, since there was so many good video games out there, not one staff member could have played through them all and have a passionate argument for the games. When you have a lot of must play games with a staff full of diversity, there will be bitterness. It's definitely telling that they wanted all games to get their shine in the spotlight with categories like "best world" but couldn't because it devolved into a competition on what game the staff enjoyed more.
Log in to comment