Man, so much Polygon hate in this topic...
- I expressed my frustration with Polygon and their seemingly blatant bias when it comes to PS3 exclusives like Ni no Kuni, for which they gave a 6.5/10
- I asked if it was coincidental that Polygon receives money from Microsoft in the form of ad revenue, while scoring PS3 exclusives significantly lower than their average
- I then posted a comment in a Puppeteer article written by Tracy Lien that read something along the lines of "Oh cool! PS3 exclusive? Can't wait to read the sub-6/10 review!"
Yeah, and both Ni No Kuni and The Last of Us were written by that monster Phil Kollar, who would never, ever score a PlayStation exclusive highly.
What's that? What do you mean Persona? Oh... Ohhhhhh. Crap.
Also, Kinect games are all Xbox 360 exclusives, right? Microsoft cares what people think about the Kinect, right? So if Polygon is on Microsoft's payroll, why are all those Kinect reviews scored so low?
People really need to stop easily believing in conspiracy theories in regard to game reviews. I imagine a deal would have to be pretty freakin' great for somebody to even consider taking a bribe, right? I mean, I'm not going to sacrifice my integrity for a few hundred or even a few thousand dollars. So with all this money changing hands with all these game websites, you'd think game journalists would be some of the richest people around. But I dare you to find me a game critic who is anywhere near "rich."
Full disclosure: I review games. I am not rich.
So far I've only played about an hour and a half of The Last of Us, so I'm going to play at least a little further before I decide whether or not I agree with Polygon's review. Seems only fair to me.
Allllll of that said, welcome to the site, dude. I don't say any of this to accuse you of being a horrible person -- just trying to put things in perspective.
Log in to comment