I prefer group-based banter and lengthy discussion about their personal experiences. The final scores seem like nothing more than a vestigial appendage to criticism of critics of yesteryear. I would truly prefer a point-counterpoint discussion. Ideally this would hash out the key moments, mechanics and concepts at length. But not structured so formally rather a natural discussion. This method would push the GB crew's personality to the forefront and help everyone come to understand why a game is loved, loathed or whatever in between.