"@skidd said:Sounds nasty, I remember the BBC were pretty reluctant to show the Eduardo incident on MOTD, but I expect they will with this one. Shawcross was apparently crying after? (listening to an Arsenal fan on 5L claiming it was completely intentional?!)
Yea. I seen it live. Only really seen the consequence of the tackle. Will have to wait until MOTD to see the close up. Very unfortunate. "" @p4ddym1607 said:
" Injury alert. Aaron Ramsey just got his leg broken. They aren't showing the replay. Foot hanging loose from leg. Horrible. "Did you see it live? I'm listening to it on 5 Live, they said it looked like another horror break...Sounds like really unfortunate injury, and for an Arsenal player again. "
" Injury alert. Aaron Ramsey just got his leg broken. They aren't showing the replay. Foot hanging loose from leg. Horrible. "Did you see it live? I'm listening to it on 5 Live, they said it looked like another horror break...Sounds like really unfortunate injury, and for an Arsenal player again.
" Sol to Arsenal and Maxi Rodriguez to Liverpool arent really settin the world on fire. Has anybody else heard the story of Chamakh signing with Liverpool this summer? It would be a steal from Arsenal but I dont think hes anything special. Sort of the Huntelaar of France, where he'll probably just be decent in a better league. "Campbell is...I dunno, a stop-gap? Cant really see him playing all that much, but hey he cost nothing so its not a huge gamble. I was actually really surprised by Maxi Rodriguez going for only £1.5m. Granted, last time I saw him play a full game was in WC06, but he seemed to be quality then. You seem to know a bit about Chamakh (I've never seen him play), but could he potentially be a good deal? The papers were suggesting a fee of £25m, which is stupidly high for a player whose contract is out in the summer...
" Let's just leave the thread, everyone. It's obvious quezen is a complete moron who knows absolutely nothing about game development and refuses to listen to facts. He likes to say that people are making up stuff without knowing what they're talking about, but that is exactly what he is doing. It's a waste of time to try and correct his ignorance. "Agreed.
" Should I watch it in 3D, IMAX, IMAX 3D, or just normally? "I saw it in (normal) 3D. I've never been that impressed by 3D in any film, this doesnt change my opinion at all. I've seen other people on these forums saying the IMAX 3D is incredible, so my guess is that that would be the one to go for. To be honest, the visuals are so amazing that I think it would still be stunning in regular 2D
" Uncharted 2 at most disappointing? I lol'd. "This.
" @FalseDeity said:What about Beowulf? I never saw it, but seem to remember it had some crazy-realistic CGI going on. Maybe thats what youre referring to in the OP. But Im not sure if photorealistic graphics are really all that useful, like Pixar use the medium to create a certain type of humour that would be hard (or impossible) to re-create in real life. If the film maker was going for hyper-realism, what would the point be, as they could just use real actors at that point...if that makes sense." I'm kinda vague on the question here. When have they NOT been striving for photo-realism? Rome wasn't built in a day. "Almost every CGI movie that's released have purposely made blocky and cartoony character models and scenery. "
