So i thought it was a fairly good campaign, lots of crazy shiz going on. Maybe a little short for me though. I would have liked if they stretched it out with some less crazy things, so we get a longer campaign and i think that if they were spread out a bit more the crazy events would make a bigger impact. 
 
Story was a little crazy, that wasn't my problem with it. What bugged me more was how much they omitted and left it up to the player to figure out. Don't get me wrong, i don't mind having to think about a plot but they left to much unanswered in my opinion.
 
As for the characters...
 
I didn't really like Shepard. Well, not so much the character himself, but maybe the way he was portrayed. I think it was mentioned in the bombcast, about him not really selling you on the whole...

 
And if they pushed the Shepard being pissed because of the loss of his men in the first game/glorifying of soap and friends thing more he would have seemed like much less of an asshole...and a deeper, better character.
 
Finally, Roach and Ghost...
 

I am yet to try spec ops but am fairly deep into the multiplayer. I guess it’s just more of the same, but to a more extreme degree (same applies to the campaign) so if you didn’t like the first games multiplayer you probably won’t find much enjoyment in it.

Sorry for any naivety and the lack of organisation. 
 
Going to go and finish Borderlands now before I get to obsessed with MW2's multiplayer.