Something went wrong. Try again later

Slaneesh

This user has not updated recently.

870 0 2 8
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Slaneesh's forum posts

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

I would like Orcs Must Die 2. A good game i could convince my casual girlfriend to play. Greatly appreciated.

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#2  Edited By Slaneesh

Tales of MajEyal. Very simple graphics but a very good game. You can create almost any class imaginable after you unlock them.

Edit. RPG turnbased dungeon crawler

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

@xyzygy said:

I don't care who was right and who was wrong in this; I am not touching Oculus as long as Facebook owns it. I will gladly wait until a company that doesn't own and share the information of billions of people comes out with its version.

If you wont touch any products where there is a coporation doing something "shady" behind it, there is a whole list of things you should not touch.

I am not reffering to you specifically, but whenever i read these type of comments i can´t help but think that the "i choose not to buy or use: because x does y" (which is your free choice) most likely is rather hypocritical in 9/10 based on that logic considering most people would be using something from someone that has prob done something worse.

I guess i mean that even though an artist is a scumbag i will still listen to his music if i enjoy it, or if a product is good i will buy it etc.

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#4  Edited By Slaneesh

@ramone said:

I really liked Infinite, possibly more than the original but I've got a couple of issues with the story.

1. How does drowning Booker (as in the Booker that you play as) at the baptism solve anything? Surely you should be watching on as Elizabeth drowns the young Booker who could eventually become Comstock. The Booker that dies has already passed the point at which he can become Comstock so killing him achieves nothing.

2. Is it assumed that no matter what happens all possible Bookers end up at the same baptism? Drowing that Booker prevents an inifinite amount of Bookers and Comstocks from existing but what about the infinite Bookers that don't end up at the baptism? Do they go on the become Comstock?

3. Why is stopping Comstock from ever existing so important? Elizabeth in 1984 (who is looking pretty good for 91 by the way) obviously knows what has happened up until that point in time e.g Hitler, Pol Pot etc. why not send Elizabeth after those dudes instead of Comstock/Booker? She could essentially prevent every atrocity that has ever occurred from happening but instead goes after Comstock.

4. If Comstock didn't truly want to stop Booker, like some people have suggested, why create Songbird?

I second this. If no matter what Booker does he always end up in the same spot somehow, how does drowning the booker that has denied the baptism help. I understand the coin heads/tails methaphor that he makes the same choices.

Should there not A: be an infinite ammount of universes where every possibility happens

or B: Be an infinite ammount of bookers that do not accept the baptism with one of them beeing a variable where he does not kill himself, or is the arugment that every booker that does not do the baptism kills himself.

What i fail to understand is how killing himself in the end prevent all the other possible outcomes.

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#5  Edited By Slaneesh

@IAmNotBatman said:

@JamesJeux007 said:

Hell yeah Daniel Fortesque ! MediEvil is an amazing game !

The name did not even click with me untill i saw this. I loved those games!

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#6  Edited By Slaneesh

@ptys said:

Microsoft really don't come up with the best names do they, I'm mean Xbox, come on! Admittedly Apple is just a terrible. Middle-age men in suits should not name commercial products IMO.

We all thought Wii was the worst name in history when the details came out

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#7  Edited By Slaneesh

@SmilingPig said:

How many copies did they sell of Jurassic park?

15?

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#8  Edited By Slaneesh

1) On gold shields/barries have to break before you can do damage to health.

That means if you do a headshot on a guy who only has 1% shield left its not going to touch his health. This is very important to note.

2) Most gold runs are done for credits as the time it takes to complete is normally not worth it if you do it for the experience.

3) If you do gold runs for money most people would choose Cerberus as they are by far the easiest enemies (Credits are not affected).

The only real trouble comes from Phantoms on gold - and going back to my previous point this makes Stasis bouble highly more valuable than the damage version, since you cant touch heath unless the barrier is gone.

So a Stasis specced Asari is a must combined with atleast 1 Salarian Infiltrator. Why?

The salarian Infiltrator has energy drain which can be used in cloak just before sniping to take away the shield and then kill the enemy. This is without the upgrade in the energy tree that allows you to use an abilty.

A Salarian infiltrator with the Widow will out damage any other class on gold

Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#9  Edited By Slaneesh

@RoboJeebus said:

@magellan

I don't think I'm alone when I say that one of the main reasons I was a premium member was to support a small community driven website, that had a lot of original ideas, and great personalities. The subscriber only content was the icing on the cake.

Now, I can't help but feel like we were duped into supporting this website, only to be used as a metric on how quickly the site has grown, and make the website more attractive for buyers.

What he said
Avatar image for slaneesh
Slaneesh

870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

8

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

#10  Edited By Slaneesh

@LeeroyPinkerton said:

wonder what would've happened to that Road to 1 million gamerscore guy lost all of his stuff...