HERE Chris DeLeon explains that "video games"are not games at all. Games are defined (loosely) as goals governed by rules that must be adhered to. In video games the rules can not be circumvented so it is more of an experience. (Please read the article on the link instead of trying to argue with my paraphrasing).
I completely agree and have been working on this issue for a while. Trying to come up with something that might lend a little more credence to these experiences. I'm a Disabled Combat Veteran, Ranger and Scout Team Leader and "video games" have been and continue to be extremely important to me. They are more than just games to me. They are not silly time wasting distractions without any serious usefulness. They are social, inspiring, horrifying, clever, frustrating, inventive and imaginative ways for me to experience things I could never have without them. At least not since my injuries. Movies have the word "Film" which has evolved in to a very elegant connotation with strong artistic implications. In reality "video games" are just as deserving of the same respect and in my personal opinion much more creative and expressive. Just like cartoons have "animation" I believe "video games" deserve a term which carries more integrity instead of just the absolute simplest way of defining their most basic function.
Of course making this argument in a place where people are more apt to make fun of their peers than they are to support or converse with them doesn't help. Obviously some communities need to be judged on their own merits and hopefully we can separate the medium from the automatic inclusion of those communities. It's time the industry had it's own identity away from the immaturity often associated with the term "video games" (and let's face it, many gamers and gaming communities don't help but it's time we weren't all lumped together under that banner). I believe a new name would go a long way to making that happen.
Log in to comment