How you can tell American Media is shit.

    Now we all know of Fox News, obvious. What about CNN, ABC, CBS, and MSNBC? Don't they have a liberal bias? The answer is what every media analyst (Note: A person who studies news media in this case, not a person from the media) will tell you, hell no. CNN is so damned neutral, they don't even have a position on anything. Being neutral is fine, but they don't actually side with facts, when somebody says something so full of shit they don't call them out on that. What about MSNBC? Same story, except they also have Morning Joe and often invite in Ron Paul to pitch his platform (Of course never getting somebody to fact check his statements, naturally). ABC, CBS and NBC, again same story. I know, MSNBC has Olbermann, Maddow and the Ed Show. But Maddow calls out politicians on relevant issues, and is regarded as one of the best journalists/reporters in America if not North America. But in the end, it's all about semantics and one cannot exactly prove how crappy the American media is in words. So let's do a small comparison; the Tea party protest coverage and the recent march on Washington, just about the same amount of people were seen there, so its a fair comparison. 
 
    In the tea party protests, there must have been tens of thousands in Washington, if not 100,000 (I'll have to read up on that) Fox News covered it days before and after it occurred, even advertising it. CNN also did the same, sending a ton of reporters to the scene during the protest. Same with MSNBC CNN and all others. They covered it for a week and a bit still talking about it. Hell, they are still talking about it from time to time. 
 
    In the gay rights march in Washington, same number of people arrived maybe more. An actual grassroots protest, because it sparked due to the HRC hosting an event with the president speaking there. You know how many reporters were sent by Fox? Zero, and they only referenced it for a maximum of four minutes. Four minutes. Think that's pathetic? That's nothing, the so called liberal media is just as bad. CNN sent nobody as well, MSNBC sent one person, but for a short while. Compare that to the coverage of a fake grassroots event. It's pathetic, and insulting.
 
    Liberal media my ass. If they were liberal, they would do something to fix their coverage. Or they wouldn't pull this kind of shit in a media show. 
 
   

   
Give me a break.
Start the Conversation
4 Comments
Posted by Snipzor

    Now we all know of Fox News, obvious. What about CNN, ABC, CBS, and MSNBC? Don't they have a liberal bias? The answer is what every media analyst (Note: A person who studies news media in this case, not a person from the media) will tell you, hell no. CNN is so damned neutral, they don't even have a position on anything. Being neutral is fine, but they don't actually side with facts, when somebody says something so full of shit they don't call them out on that. What about MSNBC? Same story, except they also have Morning Joe and often invite in Ron Paul to pitch his platform (Of course never getting somebody to fact check his statements, naturally). ABC, CBS and NBC, again same story. I know, MSNBC has Olbermann, Maddow and the Ed Show. But Maddow calls out politicians on relevant issues, and is regarded as one of the best journalists/reporters in America if not North America. But in the end, it's all about semantics and one cannot exactly prove how crappy the American media is in words. So let's do a small comparison; the Tea party protest coverage and the recent march on Washington, just about the same amount of people were seen there, so its a fair comparison. 
 
    In the tea party protests, there must have been tens of thousands in Washington, if not 100,000 (I'll have to read up on that) Fox News covered it days before and after it occurred, even advertising it. CNN also did the same, sending a ton of reporters to the scene during the protest. Same with MSNBC CNN and all others. They covered it for a week and a bit still talking about it. Hell, they are still talking about it from time to time. 
 
    In the gay rights march in Washington, same number of people arrived maybe more. An actual grassroots protest, because it sparked due to the HRC hosting an event with the president speaking there. You know how many reporters were sent by Fox? Zero, and they only referenced it for a maximum of four minutes. Four minutes. Think that's pathetic? That's nothing, the so called liberal media is just as bad. CNN sent nobody as well, MSNBC sent one person, but for a short while. Compare that to the coverage of a fake grassroots event. It's pathetic, and insulting.
 
    Liberal media my ass. If they were liberal, they would do something to fix their coverage. Or they wouldn't pull this kind of shit in a media show. 
 
   

   
Give me a break.
Posted by Claude

 

Posted by GamerGeek360

Umm...except for the fact that almost every American (except for the extreme liberals who think their shit doesn't stink, *psst* it does) would say, MSNBC is EXTREMELY liberal! And Fox News is EXTREMELY conservative! Hence why I stick to CNN or BBC America whenever possible.

Posted by ninjakiller