sodacat's forum posts

#1 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

It fits to a letter the literal reading of the concept description.

#2 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

Yeah, sorry for the way those posts are worded. I might have been subconsciously baiting an argument there.

#3 Edited by sodacat (214 posts) -

@hailinel said:

@sodacat said:

@hailinel: They sure did! But also the title of the concept is wrong. What it describes is Sex change, not Gender change. Gender change... is probably not possible, and even if it is then the only games that include it would probably be those X-change porn games.

Depends on what you mean specifically by sex and gender.

No, it doesn't, because those words each have definitions, and they do not mean the same thing. "Gender change" would be so debatable it would be impossible to label anything with as a concept. It would be like making "feels alright" as a concept.

#4 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

@hailinel: They sure did! But also the title of the concept is wrong. What it describes is Sex change, not Gender change. Gender change... is probably not possible, and even if it is then the only games that include it would probably be those X-change porn games.

#5 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

Man, you forgot the most important of the game's scores: the 9/9/9/9 from Famitsu.

Important as in "Japan just because you don't know how to make console games anymore doesn't mean you need to be this desperate for validation."

#6 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

If someone renames Gender Change to Sex Change I promise to probably fix all the language in the description and remove the games where only cross-dressing occurs.

#7 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -

Should the concept for an engine or middleware be attached to a cancelled game if it was known to be used during development?

#8 Posted by sodacat (214 posts) -
#9 Edited by sodacat (214 posts) -

It's also important to mention that a bit more detective work is necessary in these cases, because it's not plagiarism if the same person posts their own writing on multiple sites.

Actually it is, because after posting anything it becomes the property of Giantbomb and can not be reposted elsewhere. No one ever reads the TOU~

#10 Edited by sodacat (214 posts) -

Was just browsing through some concepts and I noticed a bunch of them just use generic related screenshots now. Is this an admin decision?

Previously pages like Player-owned Houses and Interior Decorating had images of the Monopoly house and Martha Stewart, respectively.