@jakob187: Oh yeah, true. I just have a cheap Alltel phone that has limited capabilities (i.e. only texting, phone calls, picture messages, video messages, crappy browser, etc), so I hadn't even thought of that.
I've never used AT&T before, but is the DataPro option cheaper than their unlimited data plan?
If so this seems like a great move on AT&T's part. 2GB of data in one month is A LOT, especially considering texts, pictures, and video messages are rarely over several kilobytes.
" Fire Emblem: Path of Radiance and Fire Emblem: Radiant Dawn have some of the best stories in the series. Path of Radiance is a great story in its own right, but everything that occurs is almost like a prologue to Radiant Dawn. Challenging games, too. "
In fact, both of the Game Boy Advance Fire Emblem games have great stories as well. There's a wide cast of characters, all of whom are very interesting.
@Unknown_Pleasures: Fine, here's what GameSpot's review says about it (but that's not reliable either because it's opinionated! Oh god!).
THQ hired Vicarious Visions to develop Jet Grind Radio, the same company responsible for the handheld versions of Activision's popular Tony Hawk's Pro Skater series. Not surprisingly, Jet Grind Radio looks and plays like a simplified version of Tony Hawk's Pro Skater. Each neighborhood is rendered from an isometric viewpoint that makes 2D graphics appear three-dimensional. You can skate anywhere you like and use many of the objects in the environment to boost yourself into hard to reach areas. Skating is accomplished by pushing forward on the directional pad, while the buttons allow you to jump, spin, and perform a small selection of pre-programmed tricks. Many of the complicated moves that you'll find in the Tony Hawk series--such as manuals, re-verts, and multi-twist tricks--aren't possible here. The trick repertoire is perfectly sufficient to allow you to reach the spots you need to reach, but not nearly as diverse as what you'll find in traditional skateboarding games.
@Unknown_Pleasures: Wikipedia has proven itself to be a reliable enough sources in enough situations that taking the elitist stance of "Wikipedia is not a reliable source" is pretty ridiculous at this point. It's more reliable than a forum post from an anonymous user.
Log in to comment