Superman64

@Tennmuerti said:

@PixelPrinny said:

One day in Internet Land, I came across a poorly written article that I didn't agree with so I decided to make a forum post telling people to go read it and give the poorly written article more traffic. Thinking back, I'm not sure why I did it, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.

@Superman64 said:

@PixelPrinny: And then you came into that topic to a make post that you thought was clever...but wasn't.

Hmmmm, you know, I think it was rather clever.Especially when the OP acts butt-hurt about it.

OP has nothing to say

Xentax? What is that - some sort of anti-anxiety pill?

@Superman64 said:

@ZeForgotten: Ummmm how do you know he stole that image exactly? And yes...by listing Jeff under the header of "Crap Reviewer"....that's pretty safe to say he's calling him a crap reviewer.

Your title made people think he was calling Jeff out alone. 

@LiquidS said:

@Superman64: Is that your website?

Would be lying if that thought didn't cross my mind. But yeah, articl is bullshit. Whether or not a review is good or bad depends entirely on what side of the score the author deems the "appropriate" score falls on.

I never heard of Xentax either. I saw this article posted on Raptr.

...at least that's what Xentax.com says:
 
http://www.xentax.com/?p=303
 
And as you can see Jeff isn't the only one he thinks is "crap". 
 
All of this over Duke Nukem Forever reviews.
 
This guy must really like Duke.

As someone who plays Black Ops way too much (Rank 50, Prestige 15)...I have no interest in this service at all. This isn't worth paying for.

As someone who loved Dead Rising 2...I'm not going to buy this. I already have DR2, I'm not going to shell out $60-$40 for the same game, but with Frank West. That's just stupid.