Something went wrong. Try again later

sweep

Stay in the woods. Stay green. Stay safe.

10886 3660 770 51355
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

The Shadow Complex Controversy

 Orson Scott Card, designer of the world in which Shadow Complex is set, is a chronic homophobe. Some people seem to believe the indirect profits Card receives from this game justify a complete Boycott. I appreciate there are probably people here who both agree and disagree with this sentiment; despite a complete absence of any anti-gay themes featuring in the game. (Thanks to Coins from Neogaf for the links)
 
Heres some ramblings from Card:

Homophobe. lol.
Homophobe. lol.

 The first and greatest threat from court decisions in California and Massachusetts, giving legal recognition to "gay marriage," is that it marks the end of democracy in America.

 Already in several states, there are textbooks for children in the earliest grades that show "gay marriages" as normal. How long do you think it will be before such textbooks become mandatory -- and parents have no way to opt out of having their children taught from them?

 
How do we feel stacking up a boycott based on ethical principles and human rights against, for example, the Left 4 Dead 2 boycott - which is an outburst against Valve for, amongst other things, putting out content which doesn't justify an individual release with a full retail price tag.
 
No Caption Provided

I think it's ridiculous that an entire dev team should be punished for an individuals ridiculously backwards world perspective - especially when the game is not a vehicle being used to channel it. Gaygamer issued this article in response:

I still don't have an answer for myself. I think if you're obviously too disgusted to enjoy the game, avoid it, and speak out. However, if you want to play the game, play it. Enjoy it, but offset the hate: if you buy Shadow Complex, donate $5, $10, $15 if you can spare it to a gay charity. Let them know why you're giving the money. Card won't get nearly that much per game. In message boards or user reviews, in blogs or tweets, if it comes up, let people know exactly what Card has said on the matter, and where, and damn him with his own language.

Money is important, but far more important to him, and to history, is his legacy. You can tell from his reactions how much being called a homophobe rankles him. Increasingly and through his own work, the line on Orson Scott Card has moved away from "respected science fiction author" to "kind of insane about this whole gay thing." As his views become more and more fringe, and we continue to gain the rights he's fighting against, he'll retreat further into a conservative ghetto. At that point the country will either persist as it has for hundreds of years, or Card will be right, we'll lose our reproductive imperative, and civilization will be over. If that happens, I'll owe him a coke. Caffeine-free, of course.

Which makes sense.

Offset the hate, yo!


 
I already bought the game. It's awesome, and worthy of your hard earned. I consider this blog post my good deed for the day. You guys can make up your own minds :) 
 
Thanks For Reading
Love Sweep

163 Comments

164 Comments

Avatar image for ediscool
EdIsCool

1140

Forum Posts

112

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Edited By EdIsCool

I dont have to give money to  the dev team.Plenty of people have bought the game hence my money would buy them a top of the range coffee maker as well as fund a nutcase.Or I can give them no money, they have to buy a crappier coffee machine   and  my conscience is clear.
 
A more interesting question would be if a great game was selling poorly and a fucktard like card was linked with it would I buy it?
Answer...very difficult it would have to be like Bioshock..i.e after playing the demo I felt that the devs had designed a game for me.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@raddevon: Best chart ever. I would have opted out for one that is similiar to the "Republican Budget Blueprint" but yours is at least 100 times better.
Avatar image for raddevon
raddevon

515

Forum Posts

5663

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 11

Edited By raddevon

Also, I feel I need to clarify that I have followed this thread since the beginning and there has never been anyone mentioning a boycott except for all the people crying out that being an informed consumer is stupid. We have had people talking about how the circumstances surrounding this game make each of them feel uncomfortable as individuals, but there has been no call to arms.

Avatar image for deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96
deactivated-5c5cdba6e0b96

8259

Forum Posts

51

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 3

He is a fucktard and should be sent to a country like Iran, where gays are hung everyday, maybe then he'd see how fucked up his views are.

Avatar image for raddevon
raddevon

515

Forum Posts

5663

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 11

Edited By raddevon
@ryanwho: I have created a handy flowchart for you since you obviously do not understand the concepts involved in the theoretical scenario you have concocted.
No Caption Provided

I hope that clears everything up.
Avatar image for citizenkane
citizenkane

10894

Forum Posts

29122

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 106

Edited By citizenkane

I do agree that boycotting the game based on one man, who is indirectly involved in the production of the game, and his views is stupid and ignorant in itself.  The guys who are actually making the game do not share the views of Card and deserve the money they get from people buying the game.

Avatar image for illmatic
Illmatic

1380

Forum Posts

7

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

Edited By Illmatic

In the end, I thought what do I want more: to support a dev team that made a good game or deny them money because of one man's view. I chose the former and enjoyed the game. No way am I gonna punish the team because of different political views.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@IncredibleBulk92: Well know that somebody asked the big question, because nobody has, it is time to talk about it (Which is good because this thread could have used a lock)
 
There's no boycott. None, what we've got here, is a question. A simple question. What is the payment of Orson Scott Card? Now I know, some people say that Chair owns Empire, but they don't. They own the rights of the universe, which essentially means they can add on to the universe at their leisure (Which they will, hence the movie they've announced). Because of this, Orson Scott Card still had to recieve some form of creative fees, which tend to be either royalties based or one time payment. People want to know, and I have the right to know because I bought the game, and I am entitled to knowing "who got what". 
 
The people who are against purchasing the game, are making a personal choice, they aren't necessarily boycotting. In fact, most of the people who are not buying the game have made it clear that they aren't boycotting. Personally I don't know where people got the idea, I think it's projection. Anyways, the "boycott", it's not official, or really happening. We can both understand why people wouldn't buy the game.
Avatar image for incrediblebulk92
IncredibleBulk92

948

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By IncredibleBulk92
@Snipzor: Ah I see, I hadn't realised there were special charities that deal with sucicide dedicated to specific groups.  Seems odd to me that there would be a high enough suicide rate within those groups to warrant such specialised charities.  I guess the lobbying groups makes sense though and would probably achieve the most good in the long run. 
 
I'm still not sure I understand why there's an almost boycott of Shadow Complex, the sales of this game aren't going to harm anyone that this guy is afraid of.  I mean unless he uses the sales of this game to buy himself a shotgun and a taxi to the nearest gay bar I don't feel like my purcahse has harmed anyone or changed anybody's opinion.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho

This is worse than an empty gesture, though, because talented people are losing money in the process. I'd prefer an empty gesture that solves nothing and doesn't catch bystanders in the crossfire.
I just don't see the endgame, here. I see this underpants gnome style logic "ban figure vaguely connected to game, ______, gay marriage is acceptable/profit?"
I don't even see a tangential connection, ultimately all these means is Card will have to skip on one of the dips in his three dip salsa at the next "sanctity of marriage" meeting. And a bunch of developers will suffer, not that you care obviously.

Avatar image for jimbo
Jimbo

10472

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Jimbo

The thing with boycotts is you actually need to pick an issue that more than a handful of people give a shit about.  Otherwise, they aren't just futile, they might even be counterproductive - a boycott without boycotters is just free publicity.  This might have made a few people feel better about themselves, but that's as far as it goes.  I imagine Shadow Complex has been a runaway success for all involved and they won't think twice about making a sequel in the same universe.
 
Also, the idea that you can buy back the moral highground by donating something to charity is laughable.  'Paying off your guilty conscience' and 'having principles' are not the same thing - they could not be more different.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@IncredibleBulk92 said:
There are gay charities?  Why do gay people need a charity?  It's not like they need a cancer charity where they're trying to cure a disease or like a homeless charity here they're trying to solve a problem.  Surely there's no need for such an organisation...
LGBT teens commit suicide at an alarming rate, there are tons of organizations that deal with that. Then there are the med centers that deal with HIV related illnesses, which also double as youth med centers. Then lobbying groups and whatnot, which make up the most of the actual organizations.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho
@raddevon said:

" @ryanwho: If the sequel bombed in spite of being great, I would call that a pretty effective stand. "

Effective at what? Spiting the village for the fool? God you're dense.
Avatar image for incrediblebulk92
IncredibleBulk92

948

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 6

Edited By IncredibleBulk92
@Sweep said: 
   
I think it's ridiculous that an entire dev team should be punished for an individuals ridiculously backwards world perspective - especially when the game is not a vehicle being used to channel it. Gaygamer issued this article in response:

I still don't have an answer for myself. I think if you're obviously too disgusted to enjoy the game, avoid it, and speak out. However, if you want to play the game, play it. Enjoy it, but offset the hate: if you buy Shadow Complex, donate $5, $10, $15 if you can spare it to a gay charity. Let them know why you're giving the money. Card won't get nearly that much per game. In message boards or user reviews, in blogs or tweets, if it comes up, let people know exactly what Card has said on the matter, and where, and damn him with his own language.

There are gay charities?  Why do gay people need a charity?  It's not like they need a cancer charity where they're trying to cure a disease or like a homeless charity here they're trying to solve a problem.  Surely there's no need for such an organisation... 
 
I have to agree with the general sentiment though.  While it is shitty that some homophobe is getting money from my purchase I think that punishing a dev team that have made a great game for they're association with that man would be worse.  After completing the game I think it's pretty safe to say that the Empire book has nothing to do with this game, there are no characters or plot points in the entire game.  It's possible that the very first section has something to do with the Empire book but it's so throw away that the game shouldn't suffer from it's loss. 
 
The quotes that you have from this guy are pretty weird and 2bh they remind me of a guy called Jack Thompson.  Random, baseless quotes that use parents and democracy to scare the ignorant.  Sooner or later same-sex marriage will be legal everywhere and guys like this will be left forgotten on the roadside.  Roll on that day
Avatar image for hotsaucemagik
HotSauceMagik

277

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HotSauceMagik
@EdIsCool said:

and you are all sick fucks."My book that was written by locust eaters and dictated by the sky fairy" says gays are evil, sorry being a christian dosent make your views acceptable. "
 

 Acceptable to whom?  You?  A view does not have to be acceptable to anyone but the person who has that view.  


Avatar image for kowalskimandown
KowalskiManDown

4170

Forum Posts

3525

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 19

Edited By KowalskiManDown
@EdIsCool said:
"and you are all sick fucks."My book that was written by locust eaters and dictated by the sky fairy" says gays are evil, sorry being a christian dosent make your views acceptable. "
No need for the religious assault there dude.
Avatar image for ediscool
EdIsCool

1140

Forum Posts

112

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 2

Edited By EdIsCool

of course but I know for definite that a paticular guy who I hate was involved... hence the agenda dont give money to people you know are nutcases was served.
 
@HotSauceMagik said:

" From Card:
 
 "This is a term that was invented to describe people with a pathological fear of homosexuals -- the kind of people who engage in acts of violence against gays. But the term was immediately extended to apply to anyone who opposed the homosexual activist agenda in any way.

A term that has mental-health implications (homophobe) is now routinely applied to anyone who deviates from the politically correct line. How long before opposing gay marriage, or refusing to recognize it, gets you officially classified as "mentally ill"?"  That pretty fucking true isn't it?  Card isn't a homophobe.  He, as a christian, is against gay marriage.  Just like I am, and the majority of the united states.  People should read source material before posting...    Regardless of your views, you arn't supporting any agenda by buying this game. "
and you are all sick fucks."My book that was written by locust eaters and dictated by the sky fairy" says gays are evil, sorry being a christian dosent make your views acceptable.
Avatar image for kowalskimandown
KowalskiManDown

4170

Forum Posts

3525

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 19

Edited By KowalskiManDown

I don't mean to sound harsh, but seriously? If you like the game... buy it. What exactly do people think they are really proving by boycotting it?
 
Orson Scott Card is an outspoken homophobe, and a complete arse. But who's to say that someone who helped make your favourite game wasn't also a homophobe... or a racist... would that stop you from buying it? Or a movie you went to see... or an album you bought. Chances are EVERYONE owns something that had a prejudiced person working on it in one way or another. Humans are a bastard species... deal with it.

Avatar image for hotsaucemagik
HotSauceMagik

277

Forum Posts

9

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By HotSauceMagik

From Card:
 
 "This is a term that was invented to describe people with a pathological fear of homosexuals -- the kind of people who engage in acts of violence against gays. But the term was immediately extended to apply to anyone who opposed the homosexual activist agenda in any way.

A term that has mental-health implications (homophobe) is now routinely applied to anyone who deviates from the politically correct line. How long before opposing gay marriage, or refusing to recognize it, gets you officially classified as "mentally ill"?"
 
That pretty fucking true isn't it?
 
Card isn't a homophobe.  He, as a christian, is against gay marriage.  Just like I am, and the majority of the united states.  People should read source material before posting...  
 
Regardless of your views, you arn't supporting any agenda by buying this game.

Avatar image for skogen
Skogen

430

Forum Posts

14

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By Skogen

People are just looking for reasons to "boycott" things these days, anything that will cause a commotion. Hilariously enough it acts as free publicity for those who could careless about things like homosexual rights.

Avatar image for deactivated-6406b1cb85b6d
deactivated-6406b1cb85b6d

271

Forum Posts

1517

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 11

@Sweep said:
Heres some ramblings from Card:
Kiss me on the mouth!
Kiss me on the mouth!

 The first and greatest threat from court decisions in California and Massachusetts, giving legal recognition to "gay marriage," is that it marks the end of democracy in America.


 

He's right, an attractive man like him would not be able to go and vote after gay marriage laws are passed. What with all the dudes trying to make out with him.
Avatar image for keyhunter
keyhunter

3208

Forum Posts

248

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By keyhunter

If homo's are allowed to just go ahead and use rectums for the opposite of what they were designed for, and not procreate as humans should, then I don't see why whatshisnuts there shouldn't be allowed to push a hate filled anti gay agenda.

Avatar image for novyx
Novyx

483

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Novyx
@Snipzor: Fatuous, according to my dictionary, means devoid of intelligence. Perhaps you were looking for another word? Otherwise, I am confused.
Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@Novyx: "Intolerance against intolerance" is a sarcastic remark by people responding to those who say people being angry towards the intolerant is just as bad as the intolerance. 
 
And my responses were fatuous in nature until the end. Now can you stop it with this fake outrage in responses? It is getting pointless to debate over interpretations of comments I made.
Avatar image for novyx
Novyx

483

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Novyx
@Snipzor: You attacked him before that part of the discussion came up. Also, I forgot two wrongs do make a right now. My mistake.
Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@Novyx: When people either spam threads with copy/paste comments or arguments like "you aren't from here, you can't have an opinion", it isn't exactly considered a valid opinion or a set for discussion and is not subject to kind response. 
 
Also, intolerance against intolerance (Or defense of intolerance) is not intolerance.
Avatar image for novyx
Novyx

483

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Novyx
@Snipzor: Why is it that no one besides you is allowed to have a valid opinion? I didn't realize democracy was about getting what you want. You are being quite belligerant and aggressive, and flinging personal attacks that don't contribute to the discussion except to make you look intolerant and hateful. Tell me, how do you intend to change things like that? Do you expect people to agree with you because you insult them, or do you not care and expect if you're rude enough that you'll somehow win and they'll go away? Only way that happens is if they die, and the only way to get rid of everyone who doesn't agree with you is either to live in a cave or kill everyone who isn't you. Take your pick.
Avatar image for bruce
Bruce

6238

Forum Posts

145

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 1

Edited By Bruce

The game's story (And his novel) are garbage, so I could not care less about his ethics.

Avatar image for thomasp
ThomasP

1665

Forum Posts

145

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By ThomasP

If I still had my 360 I would have bought Shadow Complex the minute it was released. That's my two cents.

Avatar image for shpadoinkle
Shpadoinkle

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 3

Edited By Shpadoinkle

Does this all mean that Orson Scott Card is not gay?

Avatar image for eviltwin
EvilTwin

3313

Forum Posts

55

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By EvilTwin
@calidan777 said:
" @EvilTwin: Your wrong, if you donate money to a particular person then you are saying that you agree with this person's views and want them to be the one calling the shots in Washington.People are just willing to "overlook" their principles when it comes to games they like. "
Totally disagree.  That's like saying that you're only voting based on one issue.  I can agree with everything the party stands for except a single issue and still decide to support that party. 
Avatar image for raddevon
raddevon

515

Forum Posts

5663

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 11

Edited By raddevon
@ryanwho: If the sequel bombed in spite of being great, I would call that a pretty effective stand.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho
The bottom line is if this movement somehow took off and went as planned, the sequel to this game could bomb despite being a great game made by developers who deserve success. All because some very well intentioned idealistic morons felt the need to make a stand in the least effective way imaginable.
Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@ryanwho: You know that everything you just said had nothing to do with the current discussion, you are diverting to something that makes your bullshit opinion look valid. Stop spamming the thread.
Avatar image for ryanwho
ryanwho

12011

Forum Posts

-1

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ryanwho

He wants several up and coming hardworking developers to possibly lose their job just to take a few pennies out of Card's wallet even though Card makes so little from this compared to writing a novel its practically superfluous. They deserve it, I guess, for associating with someone who's not conforming to the correct word-view.
You know, out of "principle". 
Its the old "fight fire with fire" scheme, you know, where you put out fire by making more fire. Only in a modern idiocracy could someone see "fight fire with fire" as a workable plan with positive results.

Avatar image for calidan777
calidan777

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By calidan777

So your not American?Boy for someone who does'nt live here you sure are interested in our politics.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@calidan777: Don't dish out the "I'm completely unqualified to talk about this so I'll claim only Americans can discuss this card", it is simply pathetic, don't think that's even valid as an excuse.
Avatar image for calidan777
calidan777

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By calidan777
@Snipzor: Are you American?Because if your not then I'm wasting my time discussing American issues with someone who's opinion is completely useless in regards to American affairs.
Avatar image for end_boss
End_Boss

3386

Forum Posts

385

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

Edited By End_Boss
@calidan777 said:
" I've been reading over all the comments in this thread and wanted to touch on a few things  : 
  1. I believe what Card was referring to when he made the statement about "gay marriage destroying democracy" was that there are far more people in this country that oppose gay marriage than there are people who are for it and if it were to be made a law then it would be against the majority of American's wishes.
  2. To assume that he "hates" homosexual people simply because he does not agree with homosexuality is not right,I know someone who's best friend is homosexual but yet this person has made it completely clear that she does not agree with his lifestyle,and he understands,and they have been best friends for over 20 years.I don't agree with obesity,but I don't hate overweight people either.
  3. This guy really made laugh because he calls the other guy "insensitive" right before calling him a "webtard",I lol'ed,hard.
  4. People are such pussies nowadays,always worried about "offending" somebody,quit being such whiny bitches all the time.
  5. People always act so holier than thou,like they've never said something derogatory about another human being,at some point everyone has said something negative about another person,that's called being human.You can't always label someone a homophobe,racist,etc.,just because of one view or opinion,it's just not always that cut and dry.
  6. As for the guy that made the comment about groups of people who holler about "equality" and then do there best to seperate themselves,and used gaygamer.com as an example, I'm thinking of starting a website called "straightwhitemalegamer.com",it's gonna be the shit,we'll be the most hated website on the web : )
Those are just some things I felt the urge to comment on.Feel free to call me a homophobe/racist/dumbass/etc.,does'nt hurt my feelin's.


 

 

"
"Insensitive" was referring to his out-of-hand dismissal of an entire demographic of people. But, y'know. Sure.
 
"LOL."
Avatar image for ninjakiller
ninjakiller

3427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By ninjakiller
@jakob187 said:
" As I said in another thread, it doesn't matter, and people are being too uptight over a person's beliefs.  Gay marriage is something to be decided at the state level, not the federal level, and the United States is one nation under God.  That means no gay marriage, it's defined as a man and a woman, end story.  I've already got an argument going on in another thread about this.  Don't want to bother dragging it out over many threads. "
Yeah, afraid not.
Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@calidan777: Yes, first was number. My mistake, that's what happens when you type fast.
 
Also I know damn well what you were doing and damn well what Card said. You were defending, or rather justifying what he was saying. His opinions are well known, so it is pointless to try to make an excuse that he was talking about how the majority of people are against it.
Avatar image for calidan777
calidan777

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By calidan777

Are you trying to say "number"?Sorry,I don't know what a "frisky dingo" is either,lol.(where are you from?)Anyway,I wasn't trying to "defend" Card,I was trying to help people like you understand what his statement meant.I'm glad to hear you found something I said "lame",lol,and who was "bitching" about "tolerance"?And as a matter of I AM a bastard,that quite an astute observation there buddy,lol.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@calidan777: 666 is the neighbour of the beast, so 777 is the guy in the floor above, and bumsnacker is a Frisky Dingo reference. 
 
That aside, because I only did that for your attention, your defense of Card is pointless because of this. And your lameass point against gaygamer is ironic because you bitch about "tolerance" while being a bastard.
Avatar image for calidan777
calidan777

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By calidan777
@Snipzor: LOL,you called me a "bumsnacker",whatever that is.And I'm not really sure what " 
(yes, I'm talking to you calidan777 to far neighbour to the beast) " means,but sure,ok,lol.

Avatar image for snipzor
Snipzor

3471

Forum Posts

57

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

Edited By Snipzor
@Novyx said:
"

@calidan777

said:

" I've been reading over all the comments in this thread and wanted to touch on a few things  : 
I believe what Card was referring to when he made the statement about "gay marriage destroying democracy" was that there are far more people in this country that oppose gay marriage than there are people who are for it and if it were to be made a law then it would be against the majority of American's wishes.To assume that he "hates" homosexual people simply because he does not agree with homosexuality is not right,I know someone who's best friend is homosexual but yet this person has made it completely clear that she does not agree with his lifestyle,and he understands,and they have been best friends for over 20 years.I don't agree with obesity,but I don't hate overweight people either.This guy really made laugh because he calls the other guy "insensitive" right before calling him a "webtard",I lol'ed,hard.
People are such pussies nowadays,always worried about "offending" somebody,quit being such whiny bitches all the time.People always act so holier than thou,like they've never said something derogatory about another human being,at some point everyone has said something negative about another person,that's called being human.You can't always label someone a homophobe,racist,etc.,just because of one view or opinion,it's just not always that cut and dry.As for the guy that made the comment about groups of people who holler about "equality" and then do there best to seperate themselves,and used gaygamer.com as an example, I'm thinking of starting a website called "straightwhitemalegamer.com",it's gonna be the shit,we'll be the most hated website on the web : )
Those are just some things I felt the urge to comment on.Feel free to call me a homophobe/racist/dumbass/etc.,does'nt hurt my feelin's.

 

  "

This made my day. Seriously. It's like... someone is actually still thinking on these boards. A few people even, so far. Also, that sounds like a great idea for a website, at least as an experiment to see how the 'tolerant' folks talking about 'equality' deal with its existence, compared to how people treat gaygamer. "
Really, because I found the post above your post to be from someone who might as well be the absolute monarch of all bumsnackers. Mainly for making a very shitty excuse for Card with his comments (yes, I'm talking to you calidan777 to far neighbour to the beast).
Avatar image for toxin066
Toxin066

3589

Forum Posts

118

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Edited By Toxin066
@calidan777 said:
" I've been reading over all the comments in this thread and wanted to touch on a few things  : 
  1. I believe what Card was referring to when he made the statement about "gay marriage destroying democracy" was that there are far more people in this country that oppose gay marriage than there are people who are for it and if it were to be made a law then it would be against the majority of American's wishes.
  2. To assume that he "hates" homosexual people simply because he does not agree with homosexuality is not right,I know someone who's best friend is homosexual but yet this person has made it completely clear that she does not agree with his lifestyle,and he understands,and they have been best friends for over 20 years.I don't agree with obesity,but I don't hate overweight people either.
  3. This guy really made laugh because he calls the other guy "insensitive" right before calling him a "webtard",I lol'ed,hard.
  4. People are such pussies nowadays,always worried about "offending" somebody,quit being such whiny bitches all the time.
  5. People always act so holier than thou,like they've never said something derogatory about another human being,at some point everyone has said something negative about another person,that's called being human.You can't always label someone a homophobe,racist,etc.,just because of one view or opinion,it's just not always that cut and dry.
  6. As for the guy that made the comment about groups of people who holler about "equality" and then do there best to seperate themselves,and used gaygamer.com as an example, I'm thinking of starting a website called "straightwhitemalegamer.com",it's gonna be the shit,we'll be the most hated website on the web : )
Those are just some things I felt the urge to comment on.Feel free to call me a homophobe/racist/dumbass/etc.,does'nt hurt my feelin's.


 

 

"
Is it cool if i call you "dead on and well spoken?"
Avatar image for novyx
Novyx

483

Forum Posts

2

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 2

Edited By Novyx

@calidan777

said:

" I've been reading over all the comments in this thread and wanted to touch on a few things  : 
I believe what Card was referring to when he made the statement about "gay marriage destroying democracy" was that there are far more people in this country that oppose gay marriage than there are people who are for it and if it were to be made a law then it would be against the majority of American's wishes.To assume that he "hates" homosexual people simply because he does not agree with homosexuality is not right,I know someone who's best friend is homosexual but yet this person has made it completely clear that she does not agree with his lifestyle,and he understands,and they have been best friends for over 20 years.I don't agree with obesity,but I don't hate overweight people either.This guy really made laugh because he calls the other guy "insensitive" right before calling him a "webtard",I lol'ed,hard.
People are such pussies nowadays,always worried about "offending" somebody,quit being such whiny bitches all the time.People always act so holier than thou,like they've never said something derogatory about another human being,at some point everyone has said something negative about another person,that's called being human.You can't always label someone a homophobe,racist,etc.,just because of one view or opinion,it's just not always that cut and dry.As for the guy that made the comment about groups of people who holler about "equality" and then do there best to seperate themselves,and used gaygamer.com as an example, I'm thinking of starting a website called "straightwhitemalegamer.com",it's gonna be the shit,we'll be the most hated website on the web : )
Those are just some things I felt the urge to comment on.Feel free to call me a homophobe/racist/dumbass/etc.,does'nt hurt my feelin's.

 

  "


This made my day. Seriously. It's like... someone is actually still thinking on these boards. A few people even, so far. Also, that sounds like a great idea for a website, at least as an experiment to see how the 'tolerant' folks talking about 'equality' deal with its existence, compared to how people treat gaygamer.
Avatar image for dredavis
dredavis

55

Forum Posts

117

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Edited By dredavis

Dude, game designers personal opinions are not a reason to not buy any game, good or bad.

Avatar image for calidan777
calidan777

916

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

Edited By calidan777
@EvilTwin: Your wrong, if you donate money to a particular person then you are saying that you agree with this person's views and want them to be the one calling the shots in Washington.People are just willing to "overlook" their principles when it comes to games they like.