tydigame's forum posts

#1 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

:0)

#2 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

This is a small one, but there was a podcast when there was a game company called HB games, and Jeff said that it was "Hank Bazaria Games" and Ryan just lost it. I had just started listening to the podcast at that time, and hearing him laugh made me laugh. Whenever he lost it like that it was great.

#3 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

Oh no.

#4 Edited by tydigame (85 posts) -

There are interesting attempts to deal with genre in music, here are a couple:

Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music is a little out of date, but cool.

This paper takes a whole different approach to genre, and tries to look at how the ways that groups of people who create music form subcultures.

Both of these are examples of people trying to provide justifications for varying divisions among a set of complex cultural artifacts.

#5 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

Huge applause for the courage to post something about transphobia in a place where most people won't know what you mean.

#6 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

@Grimluck343 said:

@dvaeg said:

I'm pretty ambivalent about the whole concept as it seems in my casual glance to be wholly without context. Are the (admittedly legitimate) feelings of these employees found in greater number vis-a-vis any other industry? I work in healthcare, in a profession dominated by women. Many of my fellow men feel similarly in our field. The missing context appears to be: is this emblematic of an industry that is disproportionate in its genders, of the workplace in general, or is this common societal issue that is being misappropriated to the games industry?

I think the issue is that it is happening, period. It doesn't matter if it occurs more frequently in other fields. The issue raised in the comments yesterday (which, incidentally, was more than "just grow a pair of balls") was whether or not this twitter campaign would actually achieve anything, what the endgame was, so to speak, or whether or not it was just a soapbox for bitching (pardon the word). If it wasn't intended to actually solve anything (which it didn't appear that it was over the weekend), then why write a news article about it other than to incite a flame war for pageviews (which worked, by the way, as Patrick mentioned it was the most commented thread in the history of the site.)

Plenty of people (Patrick included) have noted that just "raising awareness" of the issue was enough to justify the twitter campaign which is interesting because a news article on sexism in video games/booth babes pops up about once every two weeks somewhere on the internet. It's not even a dead horse, it's been ground into a fine powder suitable for snorting, which added another layer to yesterday's comments: why are talking about this again? What did the last conversation achieve except to make everyone hate each other?

That and the fact that it appeared at least one person (Leigh Alexander) was trying to blame the backlash for previous bad behavior on "sexism" pissed a lot of people off and further derailed the conversation.

I will say that, for the record, sexism is bad. Most of these stories in these tweets are horrible and reprehensible. But the time for talk is over - we've talked this issue to death. It's time for action. I have no idea what that action is, but it's clear that "raising awareness" is doing more harm than good at this point. People are becoming numb to the issue. "Oh look, it's this article again. Fishing for pagehits, aren't we Patrick?" Quit talking, start doing.

And that's a whole hell of a lot more than I ever wanted to talk about this.

I think that continuing to talk about issues of inequality and injustice is critical to actually doing something about them. After all, if we stop talking about bigotry, it just makes it that much easier for people who aren't recipients of it to ignore it and say it doesn't exist or isn't a problem. So, while I agree that this is a perennial issue in games/games journalism, I totally disagree with the conclusion that we ought to stop talking about it. Rather, I think it means the problem still exists and being reminded of it will also remind us to take the action you're saying it's time to take.

#7 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

I always look forward to this time of year, when they don't feel obligated to just give me the rundown on a bunch of games and can mess around and say goofy crap. The discussion about cleaners, Jeff's adventures in real estate, any talk of Max and life with a baby have been great.

#8 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

@H2Oyea: What about Timecrimes (or Cronocrimes). That was pretty good. I just saw The Skin I Live In and that was ok.

#9 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

Glad to see you're getting the hang of it. One thing that I found helpful when I was learning is to think about how to minimize moving your fingers. For instance, when you shift from a G to a C, you can finger the chord so that you don't have to change the shape of your fingers on the E and A strings. That way, you can just drag them down to the next lower string and not have to completely reorient your fingers. Little tricks like that can be really helpful.

#10 Posted by tydigame (85 posts) -

@Brodehouse: I'm not sure it's necessarily required that ALL art/culture acts in this way. In fact, Marcuse emphasizes that "negativistic" art (art that questions or attacks the arrangements of the totalitarian capitalist organization of life) is a way out of one dimensionality. That is in fact what Phone Story is doing; it makes the suggestion that the human misery resulting from the production of the iPhone is not justified by the phone's utility.

I also think that to Marcuse's way of thinking, catharsis is probably bad of itself, since in a way it only adds another barrier to the free expression of your true humanity, by having you act yourself out in a "fake" way.

Finally, I think Marcuse probably wouldn't demand that art/culture are "designed" with an intentional desire to produce one dimensional thinking; instead, he seems to suggest that one dimensional entertainment arises as an emergent property of people dealing with the conditions of capitalism.

In any case, I don't necessarily agree with Marcuse about any of this, but this article presented a good example of Marcuse's ideas. As a sociology prof, I always need ways to tie the course material to contemporary life, and this post is a sort of exercise in that.