This quicklook made the game look terrible. It's because they're just screwing around, which I don't have a problem with, but I'd much rather have a quicklook be about actually providing information about the game first, then shenanigans.
Also, I liked the first game, but this made the game look terrible.
I want to like this game. After just 5 minutes, the combat looks fairly simple but still fun. I'm liking the art style and just overall graphical presentation too. The sound effects are also to my liking. But why does the camera have to be pulled in so damn close? It's so awkward and seems like it was done just to obscure things off screen until you get right on top of them. It should be pulled back twice as far, at least.
Holy hell, 5 stars?! I was hoping this game was going to be good, but I was not for a second expecting it to get 5 stars. I'm pleasantly surprised, to say the least.
I remember playing the hell out of Armageddon and World Party, but it was so aggravating watching them play here that it didn't make me want to play the game at all. I know they're not all worms experts, but come on, you're supposed to be showing off the game not stumbling through doing the most basic actions. Next time, play the game a little before putting up the quick look. I can't tell if the game is just a pain to play or if it's because they suck or only because they haven't play much. This is one of the worst quick looks I've seen in a while, and I was actually excited for a new worms game, especially after the abomination that was 3d worms.
Sorry for the rant, but this was so damn terrible. People saying that when Dan's turn was wasted was funny, and the whole time, I just wanted to see some different weapons.
@kzrsoze: No, you weren't. I still desperately want that sequel.
Always good to hear some DmC: Devil May Cry love out there. People were just so mad about the character redesign that they didn't even give it a chance as a game. It's a shame too, because at the very least, that combat system is so damn good.
I have to admit that I was expecting a shameless cash-in with this, but it actually looks pretty damn solid. I wasn't expecting to be tempted to pick it up, but I actually have to seriously think about spending my hard earned money on it or not. Decisions. Decisions.
Centering the console around the pad was a terrible idea, zero third party support as per usual and literally no reason to get the Wii U beyond a smattering of exclusives.
Nintendo needs to get its shit together. The Wii U was an even worse investment than the XBOX One.
If you don't have a PC, I could see where you are coming from.
I'm so glad I didn't buy a Wii U now. This is getting ridiculous. Nintendo just needs to stop with the gimmicky shit, and I think they would be fine. That being said, I think I'll wait on whatever their next console is too, unless it turns out to be something truly amazing, which I doubt.
First of all, craft a solid controller that can be tweaked and potentially evolve over the years, much like Sony and Microsoft have done, and then we'll talk. The Wii remote and nunchuck was awful, and the tablet controller just didn't feel right either. The Xbox and Playstation controllers are both fantastic and have only gotten better.
Ever try the pro controller? It is a solid device, and the general opinion about it is very high as well. A large chunk of the games worth playing on the Wii U work with the pro controller. There are also easily 10+ exclusives that I would say deserve a try if you are a game player. Yes, most of them are Nintendo games, so if that is not your thing then I get it. But if you are expecting something else then... I don't get it.
I've heard good things about the pro controllers for both the Wii and Wii U, but that is an extra purchase. I shouldn't have to buy another controller right away just so I don't have to use the terrible controllers included. If Nintendo had decided to include a pro controller with the Wii and Wii U without increasing the cost to the consumer, which would be difficult given their price, then it would have been great. However, even though that would have helped, there are still a lot of games that require the special controllers packaged with the consoles. If Nintendo does the same thing with their new console, it's going to be hard not to think that they're just being pretentious, but I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
The controller is how you interact with the game, so no matter how good a game may be, it can easily be ruined by a bad controller. It's the main reason I never finished Mario Galaxy. The moronic and especially, unnecessary, motion controls just ruined it for me, along with the Wii remote and nunchuk just being awkward to hold. I'm fully aware that most of them are Nintendo games, but this is one of the most important things to me. I would like to play some of the exclusives, SSB for Wii U for example, but if interacting with them is a chore, then it's not worth my time or money.
I'm so glad I didn't buy a Wii U now. This is getting ridiculous. Nintendo just needs to stop with the gimmicky shit, and I think they would be fine. That being said, I think I'll wait on whatever their next console is too, unless it turns out to be something truly amazing, which I doubt.
First of all, craft a solid controller that can be tweaked and potentially evolve over the years, much like Sony and Microsoft have done, and then we'll talk. The Wii remote and nunchuck was awful, and the tablet controller just didn't feel right either. The Xbox and Playstation controllers are both fantastic and have only gotten better.
Tyrrael's comments