@ka385385:Hm.. My notification thing didn't light up so I didn't realise you replied to me. Sorry about that.
So, I kind of agree with you about the growing size of game development teams and such (despite my earlier comment that they should just hire more people). With regards to feeling like you're a drop in the bucket and mean nothing to the company... Yeah, that's EVERY corporate job everywhere isn't it? Unless you're one of the top level executives, you mean zero to the corporation. It's rather sad that game development is like that now, but that's just how it is. The only way for a Ubisoft/EA/Activision employee to make something they are connected to is to quit their job, get another job in a non-game industry where they wont be expected to crunch like mad, and develop an indie game in their spare time. It's not great, but it's basically the only option.
I have no problem with the re-releasing of Skyrim and such except for the fact that they put such minimal effort into it. If you have never played Skyrim before and go buy it on Switch, it's still got some gross game breaking bugs in it that I find unacceptable for a game that's generated that kind of money. If you must re-release it, please put some effort into it for gods sake, or you look very greedy and (again in my opinion) show little respect for the players.
I’ve never given a shit about their bugs or jank. Not even close to a shit. Just... really irrelevant to me.
I've actually had pretty good experiences myself playing Oblivion, Skyrim and FO3 with only the most minor of bugs. I always remember the state Skyrim was in on PS3 though. I feel like they shouldn't have put that game out in that state. Giant Bomb had to mark their GOTY for it with "Yo not the PS3 version!"
Log in to comment