WilliamHenry's forum posts

#1 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

@recspec said:

@williamhenry said:

@recspec said:

So does Daniel Bryan still look rough like he did against Wyatt? Like someone who had been off for a few months I mean.

I'm sure he has some degree of ring rust. You don't just pick up exactly where you were after being gone for 9 months. Also, he has been wrestling Kane and Wyatt. How much can you expect out of a Kane match these days? And Wyatt is extremely hit or miss in the ring.

That's why I'm against the idea of Daniel Bryan being in the Main Event of WrestleMania. He can probably be ready by then, but why push him that much? Why risk it.

I'd rather have an off Daniel Bryan match than any Roman Reigns match at this point though. Reigns at his best isn't as good as Bryan is right now, even with all of Bryan's rust.

#2 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

Stick a fork in it, its done.

#3 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

@recspec said:

So does Daniel Bryan still look rough like he did against Wyatt? Like someone who had been off for a few months I mean.

I'm sure he has some degree of ring rust. You don't just pick up exactly where you were after being gone for 9 months. Also, he has been wrestling Kane and Wyatt. How much can you expect out of a Kane match these days? And Wyatt is extremely hit or miss in the ring.

#4 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

Wonder what this break even thing they keep talking about is. Over/under when the Network turns a profit? Over/under when the Network surpasses same profit/revenue that PPV used to make?

It has to be when the Network turns a profit.

#5 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

Reports are out there about Bryan's plans for Mania and I couldn't be less interested.

They still want to do Bryan VS Sheamus. Vince will not give up on it. Sheamus will be the heel, but I don't think there is anything he can do to make me interested in him again.

#6 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

@corevi said:

@jpeeples83: I don't think the WWE can afford to keep Brock though. They are paying him over a million per appearance.

They can't be really paying him that per appearance can they? I though the rumored details of his contract were $5 million a year for like 15 or so dates?

#7 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

@marino said:

If they were smart, when they realized Raw would be canceled due to the storm, they would've announced an impromptu NXT show at Full Sail for tonight and used that to fill some or most of the time on Raw this week. You know...actually promote one of the reasons to keep the Network subscriptions.

If they were smart.

Why does everyone think that the NXT arena is set up at Full Sail 24/7? They only tape the show what, 3 days a month or so? Why would a college let a building like that go unused for the entire rest of the month?

#8 Edited by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

@fulcilivez said:

why don't they film raw at nxt?

NXT isn't filmed at the Performance Center, it is filmed at Full-Sail College. I highly doubt the college just leaves the ring and everything set up for the two-three days a month WWE uses it. The performance center is just a gym with a bunch of wrestling rings. It is not set up to film a wrestling show. Not to mention that the wrestlers, WWE staff, and production equipment are in CT right now and NXT is in Orlando.

Put me down as one of the people who cancelled their network subscription last night. And yes, I know that I will re-sub for the next PPV, but only because wrestling is one of the few things my father and I have in common. So if it wasn't for him, I wouldn't re-sub.

#9 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

Why is everyone mad? We al knew Roman was gonna win, and while it wasn't the best rumble it certainly wasn't the worst.

Plus you got what could be the match of the decade right before it. Stop crying.

So because the most obvious outcome happened means we can't be pissed about it? Reigns clearly isn't ready and the crowd clearly doesn't want him in that spot, yet WWE doesn't give a fuck and will push him down all of our throats no matter what. Thats what we are pissed about, the fact that WWE clearly doesn't care whatsoever about what the audience actually wants. If they were dead set on Roman winning, then fine, but at least give Bryan, Ziggler, and Ambrose some type of story coming out of the match. Bryan was given literally nothing, while Ambrose and Ziggler barely have a story with The Authority, but not really since they were both eliminated fairly. Not only that, but bringing The Rock out to try and get Roman over is so god damn transparent and insulting. The crowd isn't stupid, yet we are all continually treated as such.

#10 Posted by WilliamHenry (1234 posts) -

The people who dislike the wrestling talk make it seem like the site is 50% wrestling at this point, and they are ridiculous. It gets referenced here and there, but so does a million other non-gaming things.

I especially loved the comment where someone said they had to stop watching any wrestling game coverage. Yea, the whole 1 or 2 videos a year they do? You just had to stop watching those right? And the comment where someone said they are fine with off topic stuff in the Bombcast, but only if it stuff they can personally relate to or understand. Good to know that the Bombcast has to personally appeal to you 100% of the time. God forbid the guys want to talk about something you aren't into.

I also love the super pretentious comments from people basically putting down others for liking wrestling, or asking why anyone could possibly watch it. Why does anyone like any tv show? Because they find it entertaining. If you don't like it, then great, but you don't have to be a dick about others liking it.