Something went wrong. Try again later

Wolf3

This user has not updated recently.

123 0 18 0
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

Wolf3's forum posts

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I’m a giant fan of dragon age 2. Mass effect 3 I still didn’t like as well as 1, but it’s a great game.

Anthem and fallout 76 are obnoxious for me because anyone can and does spew out deathmatch games which I have zero interest in, but these developers can make stuff no one else can, and are wasting their time.

But I’m back if they release a game ic are about again.

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Super dumb question, but I tried starting The Fall on Wii U, and I can't figure out what to do...I think I'm missing some aspect of the controls, which aren't explained at all. I've tried hitting every button, but all I can do is swing my light around and jump...

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@acura_max: Thanks for the heads up! Guess I'll create an account next month then.

Have to admit, I wouldn't have otherwise.

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

@sub_o said:
No Caption Provided

Personality wise, he is really annoying. But you can't deny that he's really good looking.

LOL! You win.

I like the character just fine though.

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Man, such awesome comments from everyone! faceless, I appreciate yours, don't have much to say, but do appreciate it! I'd like something like Digital Foundry to go over the differences between different engines at different points in time.

100% agree with you. Back when it first came out I only played the first level in the demo and thought “wow this is super impressive” Looks gorgeous, enemy AI seems smart, it has vehicles and weapons that feel pretty good to shoot.

But later when I tried to actually play through the game it was one of the worst experiences I’ve ever had with a first person shooter. It’s a bad tech-demo. The level design is horrible. The scope of the maps is certainly impressive for the time but they do so little with that and it ends up feeling so constrained in a weird way. And the difficulty, it is just straight up broken. Enemies will see you from a mile away and spam you with rocket launchers, even seeing you through walls. The later levels are just insane and the only solution the devs had for making the game more of a challenge was “lets just put more dudes on watchtowers with rocket launchers” or “lets spawn a million trigens in this one small area”.

And it’s not because it’s an older shooter. I’ll happily play through the original Operation Flashpoint, DOOM, DN3D, Quake etc. Those all hold up, FC1 is just broken.

TOTALLY agree with you. And I did the same thing-played either the demo or the first level of the full game back in 2004, on my Geforce 4, and was blown away. And then based on how much I love Crysis I really expected this to be like a worse Crysis, but still good, and much past the first level or three it's just a mess. It's probably good I played Crysis first or I'd just assume I'd hate it too!

And that's dead on about how it actually feels constrained. I was expecting this to be super open, and to me it's really not.

I'd love to pull out Predator again, as I don't recall that seeming any less open than this does, only it had the super powers, and just way better gameplay.

Now that you remind me, this might be the only game I've ever quit like a few hours in because the enemy AI sight distance seemed absolutely absurd. They would spot you in foliage from a mile and a half a way, and suddenly 30 guys are firing at you. Maybe we're all soft now, but I vastly prefer modern open-world FPS games with the "here's a crescent that fills in as an enemy is close to spotting you" so I at least know why I got spotted. Sure, guards in most modern games are functionally blind, but at least that makes it a fun game to play instead of just being sniped by Superman and his x-ray vision every few minutes.

Yeah, no kidding!

Far Cry is one of those games that's super impressive and you just have to love what it's trying to do.

But it's hard to love what it ended up actually doing.

I'd agree that Far Cry: Instincts: Predator: Reloaded: Armageddon: Ultimatum is probably the better game. Much less influential, and much less interesting, but it has much more modest goals and it achieves those goals quite well.

"Far Cry: Instincts: Predator: Reloaded: Armageddon: Ultimatum" I just love this LOL :-D

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7  Edited By Wolf3

@cure_optimism said:

I never played the original, but I remember enjoying the 360 version where you go around superman punching people off of cliffs. The most I know about the PC version comes from Uwe Boll

Yeah, I played Far Cry: Instincts: Predator: Too Many Subtitles on 360 back close to when it came out. I'm sure it's not great by today's standards, but it was a HELL of a lot better game than this is. Ironic, since I assumed it was worse, given the point of it I assume was to do a Far Cry port to Xbox 1...but it's a much stronger game, AND at least the 360 port looks at least as good as this.

Also, I couldn't really stand Far Cry 2 when I played it 10 years ago or whatever, but I can at least get behind what they were going for compared to this. (And I'm going to give it a second shot-always been meaning to.)

Genuinely love Crysis though...it's hard to believe a developer could get so much better from one game to the next!

(Though I played the Xbox version which I think massively cleans up the controls in a way that makes sense.)

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

I'm a pretty huge fan of the Crysis trilogy-played all three over the past year or two on Xbox 360, and they look and play great, and tell a fun story (other than the boss of the first game is too hard).

Was expecting Far Cry 1 (Windows) to be worse, but not THIS much worse.

The difficulty is ludicrous, even on "easy", and there's no way in hell I'd be playing this without a god/invincibility mode.

It's got escort missions (hurray?).

It's got occasionally broken scripting (which would suck 20x more if I weren't invincible).

It's just boring and frustrating as hell, even when you're invincible.

I can't believe this got good reviews. Granted game design and FPS design has come a long way since 2004, but even in 2004 we'd had Deus Ex and System Shock 2, and I'm sure other good games besides (not to mention Resident Evil that's at least tangentially related to an FPS).

Ugh. I can't really put my abhorrence of this into works properly.

At least it's another game out of the backlog when I finish (hopefully tonight).

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Thanks guys! I went ahead and ordered the Skyrim bundle, only I just had another thought...can the camera/tracking actually work in a real-world environment, chairs, bedroom, living room, not some pristine environment dedicated to just VR?

Kinnect 2.0 doesn't work at ALL basically in my environment. Literally one game demo I couldn't get past the title screen, it wouldn't recognize the movement it was supposed to. Move didn't really work either (on a Playstation 3). Wii's camera-in-the-controller more or less works, but it's doing less.

This might not even work in my setup...in which case I should cancel it and "make due" with a nice 4K + HDR set lol

Avatar image for wolf3
Wolf3

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Okay...so Sony's pricing this thing really aggressively, to the point where I think I'm willing to just give it a shot even though I don't know if it works for me, so I've got piles of questions maybe people can help with...

-I understand it works with glasses...is that annoying? And if I'm nearsighted, is there a chance I could use this WITHOUT glasses? I mean it's sticking a screen right on my face, so I sort of feel like doesn't that mean I could just see it without my glasses like I read my iPad from a foot away or half a foot away or whatever?

-It doesn't come with headphones? Does that mean you need a wired pair of over the ear headphones to use with it?

-It uses the camera for tracking I guess, so even though you can move around, I assume you have to sort of have the camera a certain distance and aimed at you, and have to face it?

-Do you need the "move" controllers? I bought some YEARS ago on PS3 and hated them, sold them almost immediately. They didn't really work at all...in fact they worked way worse for me than the Wii's controllers, and I hated those too. Frankly I'd rather just play games with the regular controller, I think... Plus that adds $100-200 or whatever more to the cost!

-Can you use PSVR to play ANY PS4 game even if it's not supported? Like can you use it to just display a virtual TV basically, so that even though it's flat, it can be used as a TV of sorts? (I might just have my PS4 Pro situated somewhere without a TV if that's the case, just always use it with PSVR)

-Do you have to buy new special versions of Skyrim and Fallout 4 to have them be VR versions, and if so are they the full games, just made to explicitly support PSVR?

-Because of it's backwards compatibility, I'm standardizing on Xbox One X, so anyone heard if it's going to support VR, like if I could just be playing Skyrim and Fallout 4 in VR over there?