Well, considering lobbying is legal and is totally not bribery, I guess this depressingly makes sense.
That was basically the argument they used. "Look, we already flooded politics with money through Super PACs and saying corporations are people and money is speech, so this won't make much of a difference anyway."
I have Tea Party family members. I have consistently proven with evidence and sourcing that the things they post are factually inaccurate. They just throw some other random bullshit out rather than admitting their mistake and try to change the subject.
And then they keep sourcing the same bullshit conservative blogs (ie The Blaze) that I've proven to be misinforming them.
I spend 40 minutes writing a well-thought out response to why global warming isn't bullshit, and then they bring up Obama and Benghazi and ignore everything I just wrote.