Something went wrong. Try again later

zor

Still doing my usual stuff... i should probably change it up now and then.

822 10 200 72
Forum Posts Wiki Points Following Followers

zor's forum posts

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#1  Edited By zor
@Dany said:
" Broad generalization guys, he is not reporting for you, but yes, funny "
His report isn't for people in general.  From what i can tell, this review is for Apple fans, who somehow trip onto a 3DS, and want to know why it isn't as good as an ipod/itouch/iwhatever.
Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#2  Edited By zor

I have said it before (although i don't know why i am stating that since i doubt anyone remembers me saying it) and i'll say it again, I won't believe that games exist (in the retail sense) until it is out.

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#3  Edited By zor

I dislike hair cuts for two main reasons. First, i dislike small talk with people i don't know. Second, I wear glasses because my vision is rather poor, so when i get a hair cut, i can't see what they are doing to my hair.

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#4  Edited By zor
@ajamafalous said:
" I'd prefer a remake of RE5 with 50% more Chris Redfield forearms. "
I don't believe that is possible, it would be like forearms with legs... I mean, he fought a bolder, and won.
Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#5  Edited By zor

Oh, thank you so much, my eyes thank you too... well the left one does, the right one is kind of a jerk... 

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#6  Edited By zor
@mjk1 said:
" @gabha said:
" vg247.com has been mine ever since I've discovered it. "
"
Let me recommend this site to you for the Thrice time.
Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#7  Edited By zor

I would suggest you take your time during the interview, try not to have to many "umm," "ahh," or any other noises when starting an answer if possible.  It is ok just to be quite for a few seconds, and then answer.  So instead of, "umm....... I am alright," you would have, "...... I am alright." 
 
Also, i would suggest you use the restroom before hand, just incase you do try to... well, soil your self. 
 
Lastly, it is ok to fail, just remember that. Try not to, but it is ok if it happens, so don't freak out if things start to go badly. 

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#8  Edited By zor
@MikeinSC:  

Nice deflection there, ignoring the points I was trying to make and countering it with a passive aggressive assertion in the form of a question. Also, nice use of hypocrisy there, projecting on others the belief that they don't understand the difference between what is legal and what is a right, even though you just claimed that I have being doing that. Overall, I think you have been doing a nice job, however, you're overuse of the Denial defense mechanism is starting to make your posts seem stale. Perhaps you could mix it up with some distortion or humor.

Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#9  Edited By zor
@beej: I see what you are trying to do here, but let me save you some time and tell you that no matter how much proof you give or reasons you explain, MikeinSC won't change his mind.  His defensive mechanism won't allow him to accept anything that does not agree with his already set beliefs.   And while it is fun to mess with him a bit, in the end, you are not going to get anything out of it.
Avatar image for zor
zor

822

Forum Posts

10

Wiki Points

72

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 18

#10  Edited By zor
@MikeinSC said:
" @Zor said:
" @MikeinSC said:
" @Zor said:
" @MikeinSC said:

What? How would having a marriage proposal declined be a civil rights violation?  Having the right to marry isn't the same as the right to marry anybody regardless of what the other person opinion on the matter is.    Second, everything we do involves another person, so by that logic, nothing is a right.  Lastly, it seem to be that we are mainly having an argument over semantics, mainly what the word 'right' means. "
My speech does not obligate you to listen. My right to own a gun does not obligate you to provide me with one.  And the word "rights" gets thrown around way too loosely. Rights are big things. "
Ok, well first, you didn't answer my question of how having a marriage proposal declined is a civil rights violation.    Second, I get the feeling from having this discussion with you that you are just saying a lot of rhetoric that you have heard, since you aren't explaining most of the things you are saying.    Third, your analogy there with speech and firearms is about the same as mine about having the right to marry doesn't mean the same as the right to marry anybody regardless of their opinion.  Which actually ties back into point two about you just saying rhetoric. "
If marriage was a RIGHT --- nobody would have the right to refuse your request. It'd be a violation of your civil rights just as much as me forcing you to shut up would violate your free speech.  I have a suspicion that you don't follow things well because you seem unable to keep up thus far. If you wish to label things as being "rights" when they clearly are not --- the person who is overly reliant on rhetoric isn't me.  No, it really doesn't. For you to be married, somebody else MUST participate. Otherwise, you can't be married. "
Uhh... well, i was trying to be nice, but i guess I hit a nerve or something.   
 
Anywho, let me point out the contradiction in your rhetoric.  First, you stated that "My right to own a gun does not obligate you to provide me with one."  So, if someone has a right to something, no one else is obligate to enable that person to that right.  If this is true, and if interracial marriage is a right like i say it is, then you should have no problem with the assertion that a person can marry whoever they want, but the other person is under no obligate to accept the proposal, and therefore, no civil rights were violated. 
 
Even with this being said, i get the feeling you won't understand.  We seem to have reach the point where i am pointing out the holes in your logic and you are taking it as a personal attack upon yourself.