Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    RapeLay

    Game » consists of 2 releases. Released Apr 21, 2006

    The infamous RapeLay is a molestation simulation that allows you to terrorize a woman and her two teenage daughters. Events in RapeLay range from groping on a train to gang rape and forced abortions.

    Penn Jillette talks about RapeLay

    Avatar image for alex_murphy
    Alex_Murphy

    1195

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #1  Edited By Alex_Murphy

    I was looking at some Penn and Teller stuff on youtube and came across a vid of Penn talking about Rapelay.

      

    Avatar image for cinemandrew
    cinemandrew

    724

    Forum Posts

    384

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 7

    #2  Edited By cinemandrew

    To be honest, I haven't really been interested in what he has to say since I watched an episode of "Bullshit" where they basically said it was cool for big corporations like Nike to run sweatshops in third world countries because they paid them more than they would have gotten elsewhere. That's great, except they still weren't paying them enough to live off of. They should be paying them what they deserve, not slightly more than the unthinkably low wages they were earning before.

    Avatar image for pibo47
    Pibo47

    3238

    Forum Posts

    8

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #3  Edited By Pibo47

    Omg, i love Penn and Teller. Saw them on redeye once, cool dudes.

    Avatar image for jackijinx
    JackiJinx

    3255

    Forum Posts

    23588

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 34

    #4  Edited By JackiJinx

    Seems he has a small amount of facts wrong about the game and the fact that he said "rape games" implies he believes there's more than one revolving around rape, which as far as I'm aware, there isn't. Besides that, the man's one of my heroes. I pretty much can say that I agree with him on this.

    I wouldn't buy this myself, and I really don't think anyone else should, but I do not believe I have the right to restrict anyone else from playing any sort of game (minus ESRB accountabilities). We've got plenty of murder simulators like Man Hunt 2, Super Columbine Massacre!, and Postal, and as sick as they might be, there's no reason they should not be made. They make people feel uncomfortable, disgusted, and all sorts of negative feelings, like, I don't know, Saw, Requiem for a Dream, a Clockwork Orange, Bandit Queen, United 93, Baby Doll, JFK, Natural Born Killers, The Passion of the Christ, and so much more.

    They all stir up controversy. They should. What's life without some controversy to stir the mind about?

    In any case, Japan decided to ban the sale of rape games. What I find funny about the whole thing is they're declaring it banned three years after release. Way to go, outrage!

    Avatar image for snipzor
    Snipzor

    3471

    Forum Posts

    57

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #5  Edited By Snipzor

    Okay, I heard the first part in which he says it is fantasy and faked. Well that's horseshit, because it promotes this kind of behaviour. It doesn't matter if it is virtual, it promotes this kind of behaviour, despite the fact that it is virtual. Horseshit, the idea that is presented doesn't work when deviant behaviour has its own aura of acceptance.

    But the real bullshit thing he said was detected when he said "Thought Crime". I'm sorry, but that's the same argument used against hate crime legislation. Something people like Penn don't understand is that "thought crime" like this can end up with a dead body hanging from a fence. The argument is not only stupid, but downright dangerous.

    Avatar image for jakob187
    jakob187

    22970

    Forum Posts

    10045

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 9

    #6  Edited By jakob187

    He's boring and basically said the exact same shit that dozens of other people have said in these forums a bajillion times already.

    So...old news?

    Also, shouldn't this be in the epic RapeLay forums?

    Also also...anyone have the release date for RapeLay Party yet?

    Avatar image for toowalrus
    toowalrus

    13408

    Forum Posts

    29

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #7  Edited By toowalrus
    Ha, I saw this when it came out and thought about posting it. I like the guy. I'm looking forward to this summers season of Bullshit, they're doing an episode about fantasy violence, with a focus on Video Games. This was one of the more boring "Penn Says" that I've watched, though.
    Avatar image for cl60
    CL60

    17117

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #8  Edited By CL60

    lol

    Avatar image for death_unicorn
    Death_Unicorn

    2879

    Forum Posts

    12136

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 6

    #9  Edited By Death_Unicorn

    I agree with this man.

    Avatar image for systech
    Systech

    4155

    Forum Posts

    2448

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #10  Edited By Systech
    @jakob187 said:
    "Also also...anyone have the release date for RapeLay Party yet? "
    Holiday 2009 is all they said.
    Avatar image for fcksnap
    FCKSNAP

    2338

    Forum Posts

    844

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #11  Edited By FCKSNAP
    @JackiJinx said:
    " In any case, Japan decided to ban the sale of rape games. What I find funny about the whole thing is they're declaring it banned three years after release. Way to go, outrage! "
    Well the thing about this is that it's a PC game. Japanese people can't use computers for shit. Only otaku understand PCs. And also, I'm pretty sure this is a doujin game, which means its sold primarily (maybe even only) at conventions, which also means this isn't gonna have the PR cycle of anything like GTA or something because it's made by a small group of college guys. It more than likely only gets discussed/advertised on 2chan and then people go out and look for it at cons.
    Avatar image for rsistnce
    RsistncE

    4498

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #12  Edited By RsistncE
    @cinemandrew: Yeah "Bullshit" definitely has on and off episodes. That was definitely an "off" episode full of way too much broken logic and straw man arguments.

    The video was composed of the arguments I figured he would use. I agree with him.
    Avatar image for jayge_
    Jayge_

    10269

    Forum Posts

    2045

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #13  Edited By Jayge_
    @JackiJinx said:
    " Seems he has a small amount of facts wrong about the game and the fact that he said "rape games" implies he believes there's more than one revolving around rape, which as far as I'm aware, there isn't."
    There are tons of h-games revolving around rape or unwilling partners.
    Avatar image for subject2change
    subject2change

    2971

    Forum Posts

    50

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 5

    #14  Edited By subject2change

    Game is a game. Rape, Murder, whatever its all fantasy. Love how people are uptight about drawn things.

    Avatar image for cl60
    CL60

    17117

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #15  Edited By CL60

    I love this game, it's amazing.

    Avatar image for 1_879_116_9420
    1_879_116_9420

    124

    Forum Posts

    24

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #16  Edited By 1_879_116_9420

    I agree, just because we don't round up and jail/execute all the freaks and geeks who enjoy this stuff DOESN'T mean we support their sick beliefs. It is only a matter of caution, to not give the power to a government to kill people for being perverse at a time when we still haven't convinced said government that being in love with someone of the same sex isn't perverse. No one would force you to be friends with such people.

    It did make me wonder how we can say for sure that anyone who would play this game must be a real life predator.  That they are using the game to "test out" and get the "child rape experience." Is that so far from the reason normal people play shooting games, to get the rush of killing your asshole boss and ex-wife without really doing it, and knowing you would never really do it? What is that satisfactory feeling we get from successfully mowing down people in Grand Theft Auto? Perhaps we should get in touch with our anger, acknowledge that playing violent war games says something about our stress. And find ways besides acting it out in the games to relieve it. But that becomes an issue of its own.

     My conclusions are that the argument that it can influence you to mimic the behaviors in real life are invalid, except maybe in the rare case that a young child was literally raised by this game like that feral girl raised in a closet in Russia that behaves like she is one of her cats. But these cartoons would never be bought by a child under their own will, an uncle might show it to them, but then there is a bigger issue than the game itself to worry about.

    These Japanese-style cartoons, "anime", are only being watched by people who already have the sickness. They already believe women and boys deserve to be tortured, long before seeking out validation from society about it. The billions of people not watching anime should be proof enough that this is frowned upon by society, you know, so should the screams and cries of the victims underneath them, but they don't "feel", they don't "understand". What can we do to stop them from hurting someone real? Just banning this game and then saying the world is a safer place? How blind.

    Avatar image for alex_murphy
    Alex_Murphy

    1195

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #17  Edited By Alex_Murphy
    @Snipzor said:
    " Okay, I heard the first part in which he says it is fantasy and faked. Well that's horseshit, because it promotes this kind of behaviour. It doesn't matter if it is virtual, it promotes this kind of behaviour, despite the fact that it is virtual. Horseshit, the idea that is presented doesn't work when deviant behaviour has its own aura of acceptance.But the real bullshit thing he said was detected when he said "Thought Crime". I'm sorry, but that's the same argument used against hate crime legislation. Something people like Penn don't understand is that "thought crime" like this can end up with a dead body hanging from a fence. The argument is not only stupid, but downright dangerous. "
    You say that this can end up with a dead body, but what are the chances of that? Out of everybody that plays the game what percentage of the people will go out and rape somebody? I'm not interested in the game myself, but I'm confident that if I did play it I wouldn't hurt anybody as a result. A very small percentage of people who played Doom ended up going on a killing spree. But it was a groundbreaking game that pushed the FPS genre into the spotlight. So should everybody should be denied the opportunity to go to hell and fight demons? The only reason I care about people saying this game should be banned is that the same exact arguments could be used against violent video games, and I do like to play those. At least to the extent that if I shoot somebody point blank in the head I should see blood.
    Avatar image for addictedtopinescent
    addictedtopinescent

    3634

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    hey it's a thread about rapelay 

    yay for teh internetz
    Avatar image for snipzor
    Snipzor

    3471

    Forum Posts

    57

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #19  Edited By Snipzor
    @Alex_Murphy said:
    "
    @Snipzor said:
    " Okay, I heard the first part in which he says it is fantasy and faked. Well that's horseshit, because it promotes this kind of behaviour. It doesn't matter if it is virtual, it promotes this kind of behaviour, despite the fact that it is virtual. Horseshit, the idea that is presented doesn't work when deviant behaviour has its own aura of acceptance.But the real bullshit thing he said was detected when he said "Thought Crime". I'm sorry, but that's the same argument used against hate crime legislation. Something people like Penn don't understand is that "thought crime" like this can end up with a dead body hanging from a fence. The argument is not only stupid, but downright dangerous. "
    You say that this can end up with a dead body, but what are the chances of that? Out of everybody that plays the game what percentage of the people will go out and rape somebody? I'm not interested in the game myself, but I'm confident that if I did play it I wouldn't hurt anybody as a result. A very small percentage of people who played Doom ended up going on a killing spree. But it was a groundbreaking game that pushed the FPS genre into the spotlight. So should everybody should be denied the opportunity to go to hell and fight demons? The only reason I care about people saying this game should be banned is that the same exact arguments could be used against violent video games, and I do like to play those. At least to the extent that if I shoot somebody point blank in the head I should see blood. "
    No, the dead body claim is in response to the use of the term "Thought Crime", a term everyone here should hate as much as I do, if it were possible. See the outrage towards the pushing of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes bill, only one single collective reaction, and it is the use of the term "Thought Crime". It is intellectually dishonest to say that we are prosecuting this bullshit notion of thought crime. I'm sorry if I'm a little pissed off, someone used the same argument towards my own experience. I have not yet been over it since.

    Now, my argument is that the defense of this kind of filth is the promotion of deviant behaviour. Violence and sex in games is fine, but the personal interaction is the problem. There is a fine line between the relief of those feelings of violence or fetish, and the promotion of it. The fact that there are people (And without shock, here come the libertarians to meet with my expectations) defending the existence of this kind of filth, does not lend well to the sociological downgrading of rapists and pedophiles. I'm being slightly hyberbolic here, but at the same time the point remains.

    But you say to yourself, and if it isn't you, it is someone else. "What about games like Manhunt? Postal?", well those games aren't meant for the violent, they are meant to be satirical looks at out culture. Games like RapeLay, well they are designed for the ones they are marketing towards in the title itself.

    Doom, one of the better games at the time, is also meant for entertainment anyone can pick up. Doom isn't porn, simple as that. Aggression does decrease during "Simulated Violence", fact, there is nothing to deny that. But sexual urges is another thing, which is completely different. Like a drug, the urges don't leave the system after usage, you will always have the urges. Urges and aggression are two completely different things. Do we appease sexual deviants by allowing this game to be their means of draining those urges? No, we don't, there are better ways and we have had access to those ways for a long time, a game like this only puts everything in a Stasis.

    This isn't about the posibilities of them mirrorring games, this is about reinforcement.
    Avatar image for apathylad
    apathylad

    3235

    Forum Posts

    1150

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 7

    #20  Edited By apathylad
    @Snipzor said:
    "
    @Alex_Murphy said:
    "
    @Snipzor said:
    " Okay, I heard the first part in which he says it is fantasy and faked. Well that's horseshit, because it promotes this kind of behaviour. It doesn't matter if it is virtual, it promotes this kind of behaviour, despite the fact that it is virtual. Horseshit, the idea that is presented doesn't work when deviant behaviour has its own aura of acceptance.But the real bullshit thing he said was detected when he said "Thought Crime". I'm sorry, but that's the same argument used against hate crime legislation. Something people like Penn don't understand is that "thought crime" like this can end up with a dead body hanging from a fence. The argument is not only stupid, but downright dangerous. "
    You say that this can end up with a dead body, but what are the chances of that? Out of everybody that plays the game what percentage of the people will go out and rape somebody? I'm not interested in the game myself, but I'm confident that if I did play it I wouldn't hurt anybody as a result. A very small percentage of people who played Doom ended up going on a killing spree. But it was a groundbreaking game that pushed the FPS genre into the spotlight. So should everybody should be denied the opportunity to go to hell and fight demons? The only reason I care about people saying this game should be banned is that the same exact arguments could be used against violent video games, and I do like to play those. At least to the extent that if I shoot somebody point blank in the head I should see blood. "
    No, the dead body claim is in response to the use of the term "Thought Crime", a term everyone here should hate as much as I do, if it were possible. See the outrage towards the pushing of the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes bill, only one single collective reaction, and it is the use of the term "Thought Crime". It is intellectually dishonest to say that we are prosecuting this bullshit notion of thought crime. I'm sorry if I'm a little pissed off, someone used the same argument towards my own experience. I have not yet been over it since.Now, my argument is that the defense of this kind of filth is the promotion of deviant behaviour. Violence and sex in games is fine, but the personal interaction is the problem. There is a fine line between the relief of those feelings of violence or fetish, and the promotion of it. The fact that there are people (And without shock, here come the libertarians to meet with my expectations) defending the existence of this kind of filth, does not lend well to the sociological downgrading of rapists and pedophiles. I'm being slightly hyberbolic here, but at the same time the point remains.But you say to yourself, and if it isn't you, it is someone else. "What about games like Manhunt? Postal?", well those games aren't meant for the violent, they are meant to be satirical looks at out culture. Games like RapeLay, well they are designed for the ones they are marketing towards in the title itself.Doom, one of the better games at the time, is also meant for entertainment anyone can pick up. Doom isn't porn, simple as that. Aggression does decrease during "Simulated Violence", fact, there is nothing to deny that. But sexual urges is another thing, which is completely different. Like a drug, the urges don't leave the system after usage, you will always have the urges. Urges and aggression are two completely different things. Do we appease sexual deviants by allowing this game to be their means of draining those urges? No, we don't, there are better ways and we have had access to those ways for a long time, a game like this only puts everything in a Stasis.This isn't about the posibilities of them mirrorring games, this is about reinforcement. "


    I'm curious as to where you draw the line. You say that Manhunt and Postal are okay because they are satirical, but that's more of an interpretation. Are you saying all fictional pornography should be censored because it glorifies immoral behavior, but fictional violence should be protected, even though some critics would say it glorifies immoral behavior? Whether I take offense on a property should have no bearing on whether or not it should exist, just like the mainstream press will say GTA has no redeeming qualities to it. Once you ban one fiction, you can ban anything.
    Avatar image for sliqcore
    Sliqcore

    50

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #21  Edited By Sliqcore

    I am a disabled Vet and I fought for the rights of all Americans including the right to force a pixelated penis into a pixelated vagina and have non-consensual pixelated intercourse. What people chose to do to entertain themselves behind closed doors is no one else's business. Fucking period.   
     
    Use some goddamn common sense about it too, no one is claiming it's ok to harm someone else.  
     
    Try putting this into perspective; The guy next door is nailing his ballbag to the coffee table with 6" spikes and a framing hammer but we aren't allowed to play with graphic computer programs... beautiful. 

    Avatar image for kowalskimandown
    KowalskiManDown

    4170

    Forum Posts

    3525

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 19

    #22  Edited By KowalskiManDown

    Awww but RapeLay is just a bit of harmless family fun!

    Avatar image for jjor64
    JJOR64

    19700

    Forum Posts

    417

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 5

    #23  Edited By JJOR64

    Best game ever?

    Avatar image for m1k3
    m1k3

    1511

    Forum Posts

    177

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #24  Edited By m1k3

    from his description of the game, it seems something thats typically shown in hentai's. There are quite a few out there that depict being raped on trains in japan.

    Avatar image for mrcellophane
    mrcellophane

    570

    Forum Posts

    3969

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 7

    #25  Edited By mrcellophane

    I think people should understand that rape is a common sexual fantasy. That's why there are (faked) rape videos and stuff like that on the internet. Because they cater for a certain subsection of people, who find the rape fantasy arousing.
    Saying that playing a rape simulation like this is "encouraging rape" is exactly the same kind of Jack Thompson mentality that has plagued the world of video games since GTA showed us that running down Hare Krishna monks can be entertaining. As always, people have no problem with games featuring the murder of people, but as soon as rape is involved everyone go nuts. 
    Who's to say that depicting rape in games is necessarily bad? The GTA violence sensation recently culminated in MW2's famous 'No Russian' - a scene I think was the crowning achievement of the game, as it seamlessly tested the players conscience - his duty vs. his morals.  Maybe RapeLay could be the stepping stone for depicting actual rape in games? Personally, I would be interested in seeing someone depicting something like the rape of Nanking as it really was carried out - and not leaving out the much-hated systematic rapes. I think that would add considerably to the 'realism' - or something like that. At any rate it would be interesting - not from a rape fantasy point-of-view, but from a depicting-uncensored-what-actually-happened point-of-view. That's just food for thought
     
    But I digress
    RapeLay is a sex game marketed towards people interested in the rape fantasy. It's nothing more than that, and it shouldn't be treated like the America's Army of rapists. I have yet to see a single rapist who needed this game as 'encouragement'. Jesus Christ people, grow up

    Avatar image for jcasetnl
    jcasetnl

    2

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #26  Edited By jcasetnl

    Penn's basic argument is that media doesn't instigate violence, or is not the primary instigator.  But it cannot be discounted that media influences behavior.  The clothes you buy, the shows you watch, the places you eat are influenced by media.  Why do governments make propaganda films during wars encouraging their soldiers to hate their enemies?  Why does Bin Ladden release videos to his followers?  
     
    Media DOES influence behavior, so yes, if you give movies, games and books to someone who is a predisposed to rape in the first place, could these factors push someone over the edge.  Sure.   But that's not even the real point.
     
    The point is, do you sacrifice freedom of speech because of the risk of these types of people.  The answer to me is NO.  That's the cheap way out.  Rather than try to identify these sick people and deal with them, we would rather try to stifle free speech and creativity to the point where we think maybe it won't be a determining factor.  That's a sucky world I wouldn't want to live in. 

    Avatar image for whisperkill
    Whisperkill

    3044

    Forum Posts

    293

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 11

    #27  Edited By Whisperkill
    @cinemandrew said:
    " To be honest, I haven't really been interested in what he has to say since I watched an episode of "Bullshit" where they basically said it was cool for big corporations like Nike to run sweatshops in third world countries because they paid them more than they would have gotten elsewhere. That's great, except they still weren't paying them enough to live off of. They should be paying them what they deserve, not slightly more than the unthinkably low wages they were earning before. "
    Michael Jordan makes more money from Nike annually than all of the factory workers combined.
    Avatar image for mikemcn
    mikemcn

    8642

    Forum Posts

    4863

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 8

    #28  Edited By mikemcn
    @systech said:
    " Holiday 2009 is all they said."

    Then they pushed it back so it wouldnt have to compete with the Sims 3 Expansion. Jeff will post something about it if they say anything new.
    Avatar image for deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5
    deactivated-57b1d7d14d4a5

    2945

    Forum Posts

    950

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 3

    @Snipzor said:
    " Okay, I heard the first part in which he says it is fantasy and faked. Well that's horseshit, because it promotes this kind of behaviour. "
     
     
    No it doesn't.
    Avatar image for squidracerx
    squidracerx

    1099

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 18

    #30  Edited By squidracerx

    I just think it would be funny to censor or remove everyone's comment on this forum that doesn't believe in free media/speech. That would be pretty funny. I don't like everything everyone has to say myself, heck I don't like hunting for sport, but i don't try to stop others from doing it.
     
    But really, you are on a video game forum being mad at a "rape game" that doesn't show genitals or violence, (the girls barely resist and then like it), when i have watched morally worse and more graphic cartoons that we sell in retail stores here... (The rape scene in the anime movie Kite is worse and i bought it at Best Buy, same with the classic French movie "O", its all about domination and rape and i bought that at Media Play and was shocked that it was more porno than movie!). Not to mention the game site we like promotes and love violent games where you shoot people's heads off!? (I love violent games!) How is rape worse than murder? Sure you feel shitty after it, psychologically its terrible; but being dead is hands down going to ruin your day more. (sorry if that sounds glib but its true and i have heard a lot of people say that rape is worse than murder, and that's just dumb - like a vegetarian saying they would eat a human baby before a hamburger). And if your main concern is games influencing people to act on these "urges", well murder is easier to do that rape for anyone, you can drive by kill with a gun, but you have to be physical to rape. Again not saying it doesn't happen, but if you are worried about media influence you should be way more worried about violence in games in general. A specific call to arms about 1 game is really weird to me. So unless you wanna censor ALL games we make, (and then why would you be on Giantbomb?) then get over it.
     
    And as Penn says, hopefully none of us are 1 rape game away from being a rapist, because I think if that's the case that individual is already fucked up!

    Avatar image for floodiastus
    floodiastus

    1288

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    #31  Edited By floodiastus

    Ppl are getting upset for nothing. So do we start to censor fantasies now, maybe we start to break into peoples home when they engage in BDSM roleplaying as well?

    Avatar image for ryanwho
    ryanwho

    12011

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #32  Edited By ryanwho
    @Sliqcore said:
    " I am a disabled Vet and I fought for the rights of all Americans including the right to force a pixelated penis into a pixelated vagina and have non-consensual pixelated intercourse. What people chose to do to entertain themselves behind closed doors is no one else's business. Fucking period.    Use some goddamn common sense about it too, no one is claiming it's ok to harm someone else.   Try putting this into perspective; The guy next door is nailing his ballbag to the coffee table with 6" spikes and a framing hammer but we aren't allowed to play with graphic computer programs... beautiful.  "
    My common sense tells me to avoid people who play rape simulators. Becauase yes its fake, but its also something they're choosing to do. Simulate rape. This isn't a freedom of speech platform, closet perverts.
    Avatar image for ryanwho
    ryanwho

    12011

    Forum Posts

    -1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #33  Edited By ryanwho
    @floodiastus said:
    " Ppl are getting upset for nothing. So do we start to censor fantasies now, maybe we start to break into peoples home when they engage in BDSM roleplaying as well? "
    Because forcing someone to have sex against their will is totally just like two consenting adults deciding to do something gross? Okay freak.
    Avatar image for alex_murphy
    Alex_Murphy

    1195

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #34  Edited By Alex_Murphy

    FYI, when I posted this nine months ago they hadn't yet enacted the 'no youtube spam' policy.

    Avatar image for floodiastus
    floodiastus

    1288

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 1

    #35  Edited By floodiastus
    @ryanwho said:
    " @floodiastus said:
    " Ppl are getting upset for nothing. So do we start to censor fantasies now, maybe we start to break into peoples home when they engage in BDSM roleplaying as well? "
    Because forcing someone to have sex against their will is totally just like two consenting adults deciding to do something gross? Okay freak. "
    Erh no, fantasizing about doing something that involves domination/subordination isnt worse than two adults roleplaying it out. A game isnt the same a doing it in real life. That is like saying playing any FPS makes you a killer or makes you want to kill people IRL.
    Avatar image for shineycheese3
    ShineyCheese3

    24

    Forum Posts

    1675

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 6

    #36  Edited By ShineyCheese3

    That is rather quite a humorous affair if I do say so myself.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.