Something went wrong. Try again later
    Follow

    Red Dead Redemption

    Game » consists of 23 releases. Released May 18, 2010

    Red Dead Redemption is the spiritual successor to 2004's Red Dead Revolver, featuring a vibrant, open world set in the decline of the American Wild West. Players take on the role of former outlaw John Marston, who is forced to hunt down his former gang to regain his family.

    Please boycott this game

    Avatar image for louiedog
    louiedog

    2391

    Forum Posts

    227

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #151  Edited By louiedog
    @Stephen_Von_Cloud: We'll see. It could be the lock on system is only about 30% reliable, it crashes every 20 minutes, save games corrupt easily, the missions are extremely repetitive, and there are several game breaking bugs that force you to start over. Obviously that's a bit over the top, but those are things that wouldn't show up in the extremely awesome video they released. I was stoked for the game after that, but as usual I'll wait for the impressions before I bite.
    Avatar image for drebin_893
    Drebin_893

    3332

    Forum Posts

    1124

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 3

    #152  Edited By Drebin_893

    Oh, dear.....

    Avatar image for jokerclown88
    JokerClown88

    1107

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 1

    #153  Edited By JokerClown88

    Sadly its called crunch time.  That kind of crap happens twice a year here where I work.  Tax season and in October.  I work as the IT guy at an accounting firm, so its extra time.
    Avatar image for professoress
    ProfessorEss

    7962

    Forum Posts

    160

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #154  Edited By ProfessorEss

    I've worked in enough similar situations to know that if it wasn't bad enough to quit - it obviously wasn't bad enough to quit.
     
    The fact that this "news" is coming out says more to me about a product being developed by people who may not "love it", more than anything. I think you'd find a lot of games are made under these extreme circumstances the only difference is the employees love what they're doing so much that they are will to put that (eh-hem) blood. sweat and tears into it. That's why almost every game that's good enough for me to see the end credits has a "Thanks to the incredibly patient families of" section in them.
     
     If the game turns out bad I'll pass, because it's bad, but I'm not gonna boycott it over some alleged "poor working conditions". 
     
    I could be way off base here, but I've (understandably) grown wary of internet news.

    Avatar image for zmilla
    ZmillA

    2519

    Forum Posts

    195

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #155  Edited By ZmillA
    @ProfessorEss said:
    " I've worked in enough similar situations to know that if it wasn't bad enough to quit - it obviously wasn't bad enough to quit.   The fact that this "news" is coming out says more to me about a product being developed by people who may not "love it", more than anything. I think you'd find a lot of games are made under these extreme circumstances the only difference is the employees love what they're doing so much that they are will to put that (eh-hem) blood. sweat and tears into it. That's why almost every game that's good enough for me to see the end credits has a "Thanks to the incredibly patient families of" section in them.   If the game turns out bad I'll pass, because it's bad, but I'm not gonna boycott it over some alleged "poor working conditions".   I could be way off base here, but I've (understandably) grown wary of internet news. "
    smart man
    Avatar image for chstupid
    chstupid

    800

    Forum Posts

    15

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: -1

    User Lists: 1

    #156  Edited By chstupid

    If I worked for that many hours I would be pissed if nobody bought my game
    Avatar image for luce
    luce

    4056

    Forum Posts

    39

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #157  Edited By luce

    "an organic disaster of the most epic proportions" 
     
    oh no..this was my most anticipated game of '10..
     
    does this mean the game will suck?

    Avatar image for louiedog
    louiedog

    2391

    Forum Posts

    227

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #158  Edited By louiedog
    @luce: It doesn't mean it will suck. But, as your most anticipated game, you'll likely be disappointed because it won't be as good as you were hoping.
     
    The good news is you still have plenty of time to get really bummed out about the game. That way, when it ships you'll be happy no matter what the quality.
    Avatar image for stephen_von_cloud
    Stephen_Von_Cloud

    2030

    Forum Posts

    844

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 3

    @ProfessorEss said:
    " I've worked in enough similar situations to know that if it wasn't bad enough to quit - it obviously wasn't bad enough to quit.   The fact that this "news" is coming out says more to me about a product being developed by people who may not "love it", more than anything. I think you'd find a lot of games are made under these extreme circumstances the only difference is the employees love what they're doing so much that they are will to put that (eh-hem) blood. sweat and tears into it. That's why almost every game that's good enough for me to see the end credits has a "Thanks to the incredibly patient families of" section in them.   If the game turns out bad I'll pass, because it's bad, but I'm not gonna boycott it over some alleged "poor working conditions".   I could be way off base here, but I've (understandably) grown wary of internet news. "
    Yeah good point.  What is joystiq's source here?  I mean, one disgruntled employee could cause this whole thing with how blogs work.
    Avatar image for djeffers03
    Djeffers03

    2537

    Forum Posts

    753

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #160  Edited By Djeffers03

    1 this is going to fail and 2 buying the game is the best way of making them feel like the work is worth it, if no-one buys it the work will have been for nothing

    Avatar image for cptbedlam
    CptBedlam

    4612

    Forum Posts

    7

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #161  Edited By CptBedlam

    I think boycotting the game would actually make the situation worse for the employees.
     
    btw: Did anyone who is considering a boycott of the game also think of working conditions in countries where most of your clothes are stitched together? I suggest you boycott those as well.

    Avatar image for red
    Red

    6146

    Forum Posts

    598

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 11

    #162  Edited By Red

    It's up to them to decide whether they want to boycott their treatment. Not up to us for not wanting a product they worked too hard on.

    Avatar image for superfoot
    superfoot

    52

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #163  Edited By superfoot
    @slacker4life said:
    "if they've been working on it for 4 years and now need to crunch this hard maybe they should have done better to begin with. "

    Without more information about what's happened during the 4 years you mentioned it's hard to say who's at fault. 
    From my own experience sometime's it's the team messing up and other times management change's their mind every six months what they want the game to be.
    Avatar image for mrnitropb
    Mrnitropb

    2131

    Forum Posts

    1689

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 4

    #164  Edited By Mrnitropb
    @buzz_killington said:
    " @ADTR_ZERO: So you're happy people being forced to work 16 hours a day and 6 days a week with no extra pay to make a damned game? "
    Fuck you, I work like that for no extra pay to make fucking Margaritas. My job doesn't even give me a chair. 
    The reason I put up with this, is that it beats the alternative, like my spouse who has been unemployed since June, can't get unemployment benefits, and has nearly $175K in student loans. Eat my asshole.
    Avatar image for barrock
    Barrock

    4185

    Forum Posts

    133

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #165  Edited By Barrock

    I'll definitely be boycotting it. If it sucks.

    Avatar image for diamond
    Diamond

    8678

    Forum Posts

    533

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #166  Edited By Diamond

    I'm starting to get the feeling that a few disgruntled people at Rockstar are trying to take down the entire operation.  The latest crazy stuff has some fool at Rockstar ranting about how some people fucked up so badly on Midnight Club LA, it was a fine game overall, it just didn't get good reviews because of the challenge level and the sales were very poor.  Basically all these latest complaints are from business people who want more profits.  It's truly strange, I think some jackass must be trying to make a power play.
     
    As long as the game turns out nearly as good as it seems to be so far, I'll be picking it up.

    Avatar image for clarke0
    clarke0

    1082

    Forum Posts

    1622

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #167  Edited By clarke0

    Asking gamers to take a stand and boycott anything is hopeless. Gamers have to be some of the most willing people to blindly let corporations rail them in the ass. Look at the continued success of GameStop.

    Avatar image for seriouslynow
    SeriouslyNow

    8504

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #168  Edited By SeriouslyNow
    @Diamond said:
    " I'm starting to get the feeling that a few disgruntled people at Rockstar are trying to take down the entire operation.  The latest crazy stuff has some fool at Rockstar ranting about how some people fucked up so badly on Midnight Club LA, it was a fine game overall, it just didn't get good reviews because of the challenge level and the sales were very poor.  Basically all these latest complaints are from business people who want more profits.  It's truly strange, I think some jackass must be trying to make a power play. As long as the game turns out nearly as good as it seems to be so far, I'll be picking it up. "
    That doesn't make much sense, people don't act as jackasses to make power plays.  I think it's sad that someones personal risk in sharing the inner workings of a business few actually get to see or know is being discounted so quickly.  Similar stories are told throughout the games industry on a reasonably regular basis.
     
    The fact of the matter is that we have seen many gaming brands hire and then fire whole teams once a project is over.  They then pass on the fully developed IP to be handled by outsourced development teams who will work for less and never ask for profit share deals.  LucasArts has done this at least 4 times in a completely visible and callous fashion with the most recent round of firings happening post Force Unleashed's release as has EA many times, most recently when they acquired Playfish for webgame centric developmentLucasArts spun these firings as proof that they were fiscally sound and that it was to do with product life cycles.   Rockstar are certainly not EA or LucasArts in size or scope but I frankly wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be true.  
     
    I don't think boycotting the game will serve anyone in the long term but there definitely does need to be some oversight in the games industry.  It is a very large business sector and has almost outpaced Hollywood in budget spend and earnings over the last two decades.  This hiring and firing practice must not continue unabated and this will only happen with some regulation put into action.
    Avatar image for cheapoz
    Cheapoz

    1142

    Forum Posts

    108

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #169  Edited By Cheapoz

    This boycott is easy to support.

    Avatar image for itsvash
    itsVASH

    193

    Forum Posts

    33

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 3

    #170  Edited By itsVASH

    What you need to understand is that this is the nature of the industry, the workers know this, in order for developers to receive money to develop their games they need to meet deadlines which may not be achievable without these type of hours.  Now since their investors are probably demanding for certain deadlines could be the reason why they are working such harsh hours, but if they don't meet the deadlines they will not be given any more money to develop the game, which is probably why their working such harsh hours, or basicly its "crunch time" for these developers. Now your saying boycott the game, if you want to help these people you want people to buy the game, the more well known these developers become and the success of their product will allow them to have more lenient deadlines that dont demand such harsh working conditions. I understand that your coming from a position that you want to help these guys out, but what your suggesting would only hurt them even more. 

    Avatar image for diamond
    Diamond

    8678

    Forum Posts

    533

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #171  Edited By Diamond
    @SeriouslyNow said:
    That doesn't make much sense, people don't act as jackasses to make power plays.  I think it's sad that someones personal risk in sharing the inner workings of a business few actually get to see or know is being discounted so quickly.  Similar stories are told throughout the games industry on a reasonably regular basis.
     
    The fact of the matter is that we have seen many gaming brands hire and then fire whole teams once a project is over.  They then pass on the fully developed IP to be handled by outsourced development teams who will work for less and never ask for profit share deals.  LucasArts has done this at least 4 times in a completely visible and callous fashion with the most recent round of firings happening post Force Unleashed's release as has EA many times, most recently when they acquired Playfish for webgame centric developmentLucasArts spun these firings as proof that they were fiscally sound and that it was to do with product life cycles.   Rockstar are certainly not EA or LucasArts in size or scope but I frankly wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be true.    I don't think boycotting the game will serve anyone in the long term but there definitely does need to be some oversight in the games industry.  It is a very large business sector and has almost outpaced Hollywood in budget spend and earnings over the last two decades.  This hiring and firing practice must not continue unabated and this will only happen with some regulation put into action.
    Of course people do act like jackasses when making power plays, don't act naive just to contradict me.  I do know for a fact that Rockstar is a harsh company to work for, but I also know that Midnight Club LA wasn't a shitty game like the most recent claimant stated.  I don't think there's any hope of outside regulation, and frankly most of the job market reflects this sort of unempowered worker today.  The powers that be within the Western world have all but equated labor unions to socialism and unfortunately there's a lot of really stupid people who support this sort of big business philosophy, but that's another discussion altogether.
     
    My whole point is the latest complaints from Rockstar are about the people that made the commercially-unsuccessful Midnight Club LA are now in a position of power and how much money Red Dead Redemption cost to make and how they cannot hope to make that money back.  To that I say, "boo hoo fatcat investor, all the better for the gamer!"
    Avatar image for natemio
    Natemio

    14

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #172  Edited By Natemio

    Im getting this game because it looks fucking sick!  

    Avatar image for buzz_killington
    buzz_killington

    3674

    Forum Posts

    5319

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 10

    User Lists: 2

    Avatar image for kibblez
    Kibblez

    774

    Forum Posts

    119

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 6

    User Lists: 1

    #174  Edited By Kibblez

    I see where you're coming from morally and I think it's cool you believe what you do, but.....no

    Avatar image for daryl
    Daryl

    1776

    Forum Posts

    178

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #175  Edited By Daryl

    Better than being out of a job.

    Avatar image for intheend
    InTheEnd

    274

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #176  Edited By InTheEnd

    What are ya, some kinda pinko?! If you don't like it, you can move to China!

    Avatar image for super_machine
    super_machine

    2008

    Forum Posts

    242

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 4

    #177  Edited By super_machine

    LOL, that sounds like my job.

    Avatar image for jakob187
    jakob187

    22972

    Forum Posts

    10045

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 8

    User Lists: 9

    #178  Edited By jakob187

    ZOMG!  There were delays on a game?  And issues with the development?!  WHAT IS THIS MADNESS?! 
     
    Seriously...EA does this same shit on so many games.  Sega does it.  Activision DEFINITELY does it.  It's not like this is anything new.  Why is it that, all of a sudden, Rockstar San Diego is so special? 
     
    And FUCK ANYONE who wants to talk shit about Midnight Club: L.A.  That game is GREAT!!!

    Avatar image for george_hukas
    George_Hukas

    1319

    Forum Posts

    3735

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #179  Edited By George_Hukas

    That is such a joke.. 
     
    There is no doubt the devs got paid well for the hard work and overtime they put in. Surely the rumors of mismanagement are accurate by how long the game has been in development.. but the claims from the pissed off housewife you gotta admit are pretty laughable.

    Avatar image for sprocketbot
    sprocketbot

    39

    Forum Posts

    115

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 4

    #180  Edited By sprocketbot

    I suggest a buy-cott instead!

    Avatar image for damswedon
    damswedon

    3246

    Forum Posts

    1809

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 12

    #181  Edited By damswedon

    boycott and the studio makes a loss, leading to those people being sacked. that seems the less ethical thing to do.

    Avatar image for kohe321
    Kohe321

    3569

    Forum Posts

    1444

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 1

    User Lists: 0

    #182  Edited By Kohe321

    I'm not boycotting it... Enough with the damn boycotting already. 
     
    @Toxic said:

    " What is the use of boycotting their game that they have been working so hard on only to make it sell worse and make them look worse. "

    Haha yeah. Why kick them while they are down? The thread should be named "please buy this game" instead...
    Avatar image for myrmidon
    Myrmidon

    546

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #183  Edited By Myrmidon

    lol, boycott.
     
    People thinking they can rally up a posse and change the world always makes me laugh.

    Avatar image for bhouse563
    Bhouse563

    170

    Forum Posts

    47

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 5

    #184  Edited By Bhouse563

    Not buying this game isn't going to hurt Rockstar, they can take the hit and still operate. What will happen is boycotting this game will cause all of these people that you care so much about to lose their jobs. This issue needs to be settled by the employees, not by consumers.

    Avatar image for mikkaq
    MikkaQ

    10296

    Forum Posts

    52

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    #185  Edited By MikkaQ

    Shit, in my industry those hours are normal. Geeky game devs: drink some coffee and shut the fuck up. I lift heavy ass film equipment 12-16 hours a day.  
     
    Also I'm totally not boycotting what looks like the best western themed game ever. God if they got that juicy-ass Rockstar dialogue it'll be great. They got some good writers on the team, this could look like some Deadwood style stuff right here.

    Avatar image for begs2differ
    BigDo6

    236

    Forum Posts

    42

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 5

    User Lists: 5

    #186  Edited By BigDo6

    It might be a more judicious use of time for these aggrieved workers to find an attorney. If the Rockstar's business practices violate labor laws, they will win. That's what the previously mentioned EA workers did, and "working conditions at Rockstar San Diego are considerably worse" from what  hear...
     

    "EA Spouse is the name commonly used to refer to a blog post originally made on November 11, 2004 to LiveJournal. It sharply criticized the labor practices of Electronic Arts. The term may also refer to the author of the blog, who was initially anonymous. In 2006, Erin Hoffman — then fiancee of Leander Hasty, employed at the time by EA — was revealed to be behind the blog. Leander Hasty was the main plaintiff in the successful class action suit on behalf of software engineers at EA, which awarded the plaintiffs USD$14.9 million for unpaid overtime. -- Link to cite.

     
    I'm sure the employees at Rockstar would be willing to boycott the use of any item derived from unethical/tortuous business practices, but I'm not.
    Avatar image for seppli
    Seppli

    11232

    Forum Posts

    9

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 7

    User Lists: 0

    #187  Edited By Seppli

    Nobody is forced to do shit.
     
    Unless they whip 'em with a whip and hold their families hostage - that's what they want to do.
     
    And no - I don't care if childlabor built my sneakers. I don't care if Red Dead : Redemption has ben built under the worst conditions.
     
    I've worked as a cook in a 5 star hotel under a 2 star chef - I've seen worse for much less.
     
    Unless you want to go to war over something like this and topple the global capitalistic society, you're shit of luck.

    Avatar image for talltuck94
    tallTuck94

    586

    Forum Posts

    520

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 2

    User Lists: 1

    #188  Edited By tallTuck94

    if we boycott the games (which wont happen it too awesome) the guys at rockstar will just lose their jobs and then they probaly will commit suicide
    Avatar image for slax
    slax

    1229

    Forum Posts

    1281

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 8

    #189  Edited By slax
    Avatar image for soothsayergb
    SoothsayerGB

    1500

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #190  Edited By SoothsayerGB

    SO you want to boycott them and get them fired?  Nice Logic there kid.  BTW, I think there is a protest down the street you can go to and get that teenage angst out or you can just go easy on yourself and buy a Sex Pistols album. 
    Avatar image for c1337us
    c1337us

    5877

    Forum Posts

    56

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #191  Edited By c1337us

    That game is going to be fucking sweet. Red Dead Revolver was one of my fav PS2 games. There is no way I am boycotting it.

    Avatar image for noma01
    noma01

    3

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #192  Edited By noma01

    Wasn't interested in this game till I read what you wrote, now I'm getting it day one. Seems like the opposite of an half-assed, rushed game, so I can't miss this.

    Avatar image for the_tolman
    The_Tolman

    460

    Forum Posts

    2

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #193  Edited By The_Tolman

    u used the word "legit" so anything you say or have said to me doesnt matter anymore.
    Avatar image for deactivated-5ee489577a60c
    deactivated-5ee489577a60c

    204

    Forum Posts

    34

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 2

    Yes everyone let´s not not get this game so all those peoples hard work is wasted. It sucks that this happened but wouldn´t you feel bad if you worked 15 hour days on a game and no one bought it? The word is out there, and boycot the game will also hurt the developers.

    Avatar image for wwfundertaker
    wwfundertaker

    1563

    Forum Posts

    17951

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 22

    User Lists: 25

    #195  Edited By wwfundertaker

    Never played a red dead game before, thats why im not buying it.

    Avatar image for godlovesugly
    Godlovesugly

    281

    Forum Posts

    1

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 1

    #196  Edited By Godlovesugly

    How anyone could think boycotting this game would make things better for these guys is madness.
    Dev: "Phew glad that's over"
    Boss: "No one is buying the game, so not only was it stressful and a strain on your family you don't get any more money all thanks to a guy at Giantbomb"
    Dev: "Thanks guy at Giantbomb"

    Avatar image for natemio
    Natemio

    14

    Forum Posts

    0

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 0

    #197  Edited By Natemio

    How about instead of boycotting we adverstise the game to friends/websites so more people can se how awesome this game is?

    Avatar image for jackel2072
    Jackel2072

    2510

    Forum Posts

    370

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 0

    User Lists: 11

    #198  Edited By Jackel2072

    nope!

    Avatar image for little_socrates
    Little_Socrates

    5847

    Forum Posts

    1570

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 16

    User Lists: 23

    #199  Edited By Little_Socrates
    @SoothsayerGB: You know there's only one actual Sex Pistols album, right? A bunch of live stuff too, sure, but only one in the studio. What he's looking for is Green Day. 
     
    Anyways, everyone's making a pretty valid point about the "they'll just fire all the devs who made a game that didn't sell". See, for example, Pandemic Studios, which is, well, gone. Because The Saboteur didn't sell. While a boycott may seem like the right course of action initially, the consequences overall lower the quality of life of the employees. I'll treat Red Dead Redemption exactly as I would've before I'd heard the news; if it's good, I'll get it. I still won't buy a bad game, though. 
     
    As for the employees, please, PLEASE sue Rockstar if those working conditions go against the terms agreed upon in your contracts. And I'm not just saying that because I'd love to see Rockstar get knocked down a peg.
    Avatar image for gump
    Gump

    634

    Forum Posts

    31137

    Wiki Points

    0

    Followers

    Reviews: 3

    User Lists: 4

    #200  Edited By Gump
    @buzz_killington: I believe a boycott of the game (Red Dead Redemption, which is being developed by Rockstar San Diego) will not help to improve the situation, rather it may make things worse. 
    I believe that many of the people at Rockstar Games are putting a massive amount of love into the game so, they all are hoping to build a successful product that will sell well in the stores.

    This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

    Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

    Comment and Save

    Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.