I don't know how old or new this video is, but browsing through the Red Steel 2 forum, I don't think it has been posted yet. Based on the moves and the changed hit indicators, this is from the latest build we were shown footage from (much later than the E3 footage).
 

Fancy gif images for cool internet people: 
 

Iz thar couch hidin?

meh. for games like this, im actually looking forward to see what the playstation "arc" can do.

 for games like this, im actually looking forward to see what the playstation "arc" can do.  

Fool me once...

" Fool me once... "

" @ProfessorEss said:

" Fool me once... "

Are you serious? RS2 is as far from the first  game as any other. Different setting, different team, different hardware (MotionPlus), different art, different engine, four million times the production time, budget and polish. It only builds on a game that sold quite well and is a known IP.   As I said, Red Steel 2 might be pretty average and disappointing, but not because of the things that made the first game bad (controls, technical side, obviously unfinished). "

Fair enough. Then we're not too different in our anticipation for this game. They are very proud of and confident in the combat mechanics and graphics engine and from what I've seen, read, and seen played so far, they should be - but I am yet to be impressed by the actual content, progression and level design of the game. 
What is it you do in Red Steel 2, I wonder, other than hit dudes with a sword? The available footage and information, all of it, talks exclusively about combat, controls, art direction and enemy types. 
 
Surely it can't be a glorified Serious Sam?
 
Surely?

The Bearded One talks about "beating the waggle":
 

" Both these have already been posted.  The second video is all confirmation I need about the poor Paris team at Ubisoft. I'm sure that dude with the beard is the reason for their rampant drug use and terrible ideas.  "