Capcom Drops Resident Evil: Revelations Price By $10

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2
Posted by patrickklepek (3469 posts) -

If the mostly positive talk (we'll have a Quick Look up tomorrow) about Resident Evil: Revelations has you considering the series’ debut on 3DS but price is an obstacle, maybe Capcom has worked out a solution.

The company announced this afternoon that Resident Evil: Revelations retail price would be dropping from $49.99, which is more expensive than most games you’d regularly buy for a 3DS, to $39.99--a $10 cut.

“Since the announcement of the $49.99 price point, we've spent weeks looking for a way to bring your cost down to standard 3DS pricing,” said community manager Bret Elston. “Today we can finally confirm we were successful in this, and hope the reduced price encourages even more people to check out this strong entry in the Resident Evil canon.”

It’s unclear what hurdles Capcom lept over in order to bring the price down $10, but for the price sensitive consumer, it doesn’t really matter. At the end of the day, the next Resident Evil is cheaper to buy on February 7.

Staff
#1 Posted by patrickklepek (3469 posts) -

If the mostly positive talk (we'll have a Quick Look up tomorrow) about Resident Evil: Revelations has you considering the series’ debut on 3DS but price is an obstacle, maybe Capcom has worked out a solution.

The company announced this afternoon that Resident Evil: Revelations retail price would be dropping from $49.99, which is more expensive than most games you’d regularly buy for a 3DS, to $39.99--a $10 cut.

“Since the announcement of the $49.99 price point, we've spent weeks looking for a way to bring your cost down to standard 3DS pricing,” said community manager Bret Elston. “Today we can finally confirm we were successful in this, and hope the reduced price encourages even more people to check out this strong entry in the Resident Evil canon.”

It’s unclear what hurdles Capcom lept over in order to bring the price down $10, but for the price sensitive consumer, it doesn’t really matter. At the end of the day, the next Resident Evil is cheaper to buy on February 7.

Staff
#2 Edited by CaLe (3910 posts) -
Don't you mean Revelaitons?
#3 Posted by Jabr (9 posts) -

Great

#4 Posted by Napalm (9020 posts) -

Spent weeks? You mean, lower the price without your investors or Board Of Important People losing their shit?

#5 Posted by TentPole (1858 posts) -

Prudent

#6 Posted by The_LMFAO_Guy (192 posts) -
#7 Posted by Vitor (2810 posts) -

“Since the announcement of the $49.99 price point, we've spent weeks looking for a way to bring your cost down to standard 3DS pricing,”

0_o

Right. Sure.

#8 Posted by iAmJohn (6108 posts) -

You know, Crapcom, I'd have a lot more respect for you if you just said "We're sorry, we got greedy and fucked up and are trying to make it right. And we promise never to do that or save files you cannot delete ever again." But that require you to not be disingenuous fucks.

#9 Posted by Shaanyboi (1268 posts) -

Shouldn't have gone up in the first place... But oh well. Yay.

#10 Posted by jakob187 (21642 posts) -

@CaLe said:

Don't you mean Revelaitons?

....and there are the savings in technicolor!

#11 Posted by RE_Player1 (7549 posts) -

Now I have to buy it... or not.

#12 Posted by Dogma (943 posts) -

@CaLe: Oh I see....that's how the lowered the cost. The skimped on the proof reading.

#13 Posted by OllyOxenFree (4970 posts) -

Hahahahahahaha. Capcom, you slay me!

#14 Posted by Batmeng (200 posts) -

"Pulling a Capcom."

Gentlemen...

#15 Posted by Legend (2649 posts) -

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

#16 Posted by dcfox (34 posts) -

This isn't RE debut on the 3DS. . . or does Mercenaries not count?

#17 Posted by radioactivez0r (829 posts) -

@dcfox: I was going to say the same thing; I guess Mercenaries was technically pulled from a previous RE game, so it's not really a debut, except it was the first RE on 3DS and AHHH MY HEAD SPLODED

#18 Posted by OriginalGman (292 posts) -

Why is everything coming out on February 7th? Any of these games could have owned January. Publishers are stupid.

#19 Posted by Cybexx (1151 posts) -

I was already going to pick it up after playing the demo (it plays okay but by god is it beautiful), so grabbing it for the standard $40 re-affirms that decision.

#20 Posted by durden77 (302 posts) -

Awesome! I already wanted this, and this makes it much more enticing.

#21 Posted by Driadon (2995 posts) -

Fantastic, right in the I'll-actually-buy-it range. Really liked the demo, but I'm not willing to shell out any more than $40 for a 3DS game

#22 Posted by Axdemon (66 posts) -

Nice try Capcom, but I'm still waitng for the one-year-later re-release.

#23 Posted by NeoKef (73 posts) -

I LOVE YOU BRETT ELSTON!!!!

...Its so odd seeing his name without the GR logo.

#24 Posted by MikeGosot (3227 posts) -
@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.
#25 Posted by Moncole (636 posts) -

Because it will have 10$ DLC

#26 Posted by MannySavior (81 posts) -

Stay classy, Capcom!

#27 Posted by MariachiMacabre (7050 posts) -

After playing the demo and realized that it had it's scary moments and puzzles (you know, stuff RE5 didn't have), I actually really want this now. And man is it an incredible looking game.

#28 Posted by librariangmr (178 posts) -

@CaLe said:

Don't you mean Revelaitons?

Wow

#29 Posted by BisonHero (6169 posts) -

I'm guessing they polled some people, and the poll showed that even if the game got very good reviews, people weren't interested in paying $50 for a handheld game, BECAUSE THAT'S FUCKING CRAZY.

#30 Posted by Cameron (595 posts) -

That's still about $20 more than I would pay for a handheld game at this point, but I guess it's a move in the right direction.

#31 Posted by project343 (2812 posts) -

Remember back when we could take Capcom seriously? It's been about 4 years since then. Sigh.

#32 Posted by Gravier251 (217 posts) -

oh wow, they printed the title wrong on that print run of the cases in america? Suppose the price drop is for the best with a slip up like that >.< My copy (UK) Seems free from that typo. Pretty funny that such a typo slipped through though.

#33 Posted by Legend (2649 posts) -
@MikeGosot
@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.
That's good to know.
#34 Posted by MooseyMcMan (10471 posts) -

@MikeGosot said:

@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.

You mean like how it cost too much to license the Marvel stuff so that they couldn't release another MvC3 game? Oh wait.

#35 Posted by MikeGosot (3227 posts) -
@MooseyMcMan said:

@MikeGosot said:

@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.

You mean like how it cost too much to license the Marvel stuff so that they couldn't release another MvC3 game? Oh wait.

I think even Ono said all updates were going to be DLC.
#36 Posted by MostlyBearded (191 posts) -

@MikeGosot said:

@MooseyMcMan said:

@MikeGosot said:

@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.

You mean like how it cost too much to license the Marvel stuff so that they couldn't release another MvC3 game? Oh wait.

I think even Ono said all updates were going to be DLC.

I believe he explicitly stated that there will only be one disc released, and yeah, all updates will be DLC.

#37 Posted by The_LMFAO_Guy (192 posts) -
@MostlyBearded said:

@MikeGosot said:

@MooseyMcMan said:

@MikeGosot said:

@Legend said:

There you go Capcom. Now please don't make Ultra Street Fighter X Tekken, and get Mega Man Legends 3 back in development and we should be good.

Capcom can only make ONE game with the Tekken name. So that means no Ultra/Super versions.

You mean like how it cost too much to license the Marvel stuff so that they couldn't release another MvC3 game? Oh wait.

I think even Ono said all updates were going to be DLC.

I believe he explicitly stated that there will only be one disc released, and yeah, all updates will be DLC.

And I believe that Ono stated that there wouldn't be a title update to SFIV. Capcom has lied too many times to their fans that i don't believe what Capcom says for one minute.
#38 Posted by Lavapotamus (199 posts) -

I don't blame any of the skeptics in this thread. You can only trick people so many times until they wisen up -- I mean, I'm at about the same place with Nintendo's handhelds. I usually wait a year to buy AAA games incase of GOTY edition announcements, but Capcom is one of the developers I always wait to purchase from. Worked out for me in the end concerning Street Fighter IV, at least.

#39 Posted by Kato (154 posts) -

Not only was there a box art typo fiasco, but some over at GAF seem to be reporting low-res box art, like Inkjet printer box art. Maybe this was their "solution?" It's not like they can remove content or reduce the price of 3DS carts.

#40 Posted by SlightConfuse (3963 posts) -

not that intrested but this move does not look good

#41 Posted by m0rdr3d (474 posts) -

What?! I had no idea they had the stones to charge $50 for a 3DS game in the first place (guess due to the fact I don't own one). $40 is still a little rough, in my opinion.

#42 Posted by bartok (2420 posts) -

The demo was fun and had a classic Resident Evil vibe.  Glad Capcom has for once come to their goddamn senses.

#43 Posted by RetroVirus (1457 posts) -

@NeoKef: I know, right? I miss those good old days of GR.

#44 Posted by yoshimitz707 (2450 posts) -

@m0rdr3d: All 3DS games are $40

#45 Posted by adam1808 (1372 posts) -

BRET ELSTON, loved him back on Gamesradar.

#46 Posted by supamon (1333 posts) -

@NeoKef: Yeah I still miss his anecdotes and fun facts on games. Still, it's good to see him move on and up in the world.

#47 Posted by LoggerRythm (190 posts) -

That's o.k.

They'll make up for it by releasing ridiculous DLC that doesn't suit the game which is probably already in the game anyway just like RE5.

They may also just wait and release 3 or 4 more versions of it just like they do their fighting games.

Oh Capcom, you and so many other developers are so behind the times.

#48 Posted by KingBroly (1645 posts) -

Except...it's not the series' debut on 3DS.

#49 Posted by Apathylad (3066 posts) -

I don't buy the "we've spent weeks looking for a way to bring your cost down to standard 3DS pricing" comment. I'll buy the game eventually, but I've been soured by Capcom lately. I really like the Phoenix Wright games but I never bought UMvC3, and they should have localized the second Edgeworth game. And then there's the Mega Man stuff... ><

#50 Posted by HyperionXR (272 posts) -

Your mistakes may be many Capcom, but keep providing me with Resident Evil and I'll always love you.

This edit will also create new pages on Giant Bomb for:

Beware, you are proposing to add brand new pages to the wiki along with your edits. Make sure this is what you intended. This will likely increase the time it takes for your changes to go live.

Comment and Save

Until you earn 1000 points all your submissions need to be vetted by other Giant Bomb users. This process takes no more than a few hours and we'll send you an email once approved.